Farrar vs. Segroves
|
Bedford | Court of Appeals | |
Ausbrooks vs. Ausbrooks
|
Williamson | Court of Appeals | |
Haynes vs. Harris
|
Hickman | Court of Appeals | |
Nancy Knight vs. Henry Knight
|
Carroll | Court of Appeals | |
) Hon. F Rank v. Will Iams, Iii
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Creswell vs. Creswell
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Harvey vs. Ford Motor Credit
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Harjes vs. Russell
|
Hamilton | Court of Appeals | |
Pait vs. City of Gatlinburg
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Bethany Christian Services vs. Jackson
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Lee P. Fite, Individually and Derivatively on behalf of H & M Construction Co., Inc. v. Richard L. Fite, C. David Fite, Larry P. Becker, et al
This case involves allegations of breach of fiduciary duty, fraud in the inducement of a contract, and violation of the Tennessee Securities Act. The plaintiff asserts that the defendants, his two brothers who are majority shareholders in the family corporation, the corporation, as an alter ego or veil of the majority shareholders, and an officer and director of the corporation, used fraudulent expense and contract-kickback schemes to lower the book value of the corporation’s stock when plaintiff executed an option to sell agreement. The trial court granted summary judgment to the defendants. We reverse and remand. |
Madison | Court of Appeals | |
Atty. Gen. vs. Elk View Land & Gravel
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Cobble vs. Shewmake et al
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Grimes vs. Grimes
|
Maury | Court of Appeals | |
Henry vs. Metro Gov't
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Collins vs. Willis
|
Coffee | Court of Appeals | |
Robert Belch vs. Delisa Alsup
|
Madison | Court of Appeals | |
Charles Belk vs. Obion Co.
|
Obion | Court of Appeals | |
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
The Realty Shop vs. RR Westminster Holding
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Gordon Peters vs. Sharon Peters
|
Madison | Court of Appeals | |
State vs. William Cox vs. A.C. Gilless
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Annette Willis Clay v. Kerry Clay
Annette Clay (“Wife” or “Appellant”) appeals the judgment of the trial court which granted a divorce to Annette Clay and Kerry Clay (“Husband” or “Appellee”), awarded to Husband $17,270.00 of Wife’s total retirement benefit, awarded to Wife $212.00 of Husband’s $28,460.80 workers’ compensation settlement, and failed to award any amount of Husband’s workers’ compensation settlement as child support for the parties’ children. |
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Quality First Staffing Services, v. Chase-Cavett Services, Inc., and Personnel Plus, Inc.
James Richardson (“Richardson”) and James Taylor (“Taylor”), officers and agents 1It is not nec essary tha t the perso n who is c harged with conte mpt b e a party to the underlying proceeding. Tennessee Code Annotated §29-9-102(3) states that a court can inflict punishments for contempts of court for “the willful disobedience or resistance of an y officer of the said courts, party, juror, witness, or any other person to any lawful writ, pro cess, o rder, rule, de cree, or command of sa id courts .” (em phasis added). It is also not necessary that the proceedings out of which the contempt arose be complete. A judgment of contempt fixing punishment is a final judgment from w hich app eal will lie. Hall v . Hall, 772 S.W.2d 432, (Tenn.App. 1989 ); Rules App.Proc., Rule 3(a). 2 of Personnel Plus, Inc. (“Personnel”) appeal the ruling of the trial court holding them in contempt for failure to pay Sixty Seven Thousand Dollars ($67,000.00) owed by Personnel to Quality First Staffing Services (“Quality”) into the Registry of the Chancery Clerk. |
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Willie Perry, v. Robert Conley, et al.
Willie Perry ("Perry" or "Appellant") appeals the judgment of the trial court granting summary judgment to Appellees Robert Conley, et al. ("Appellees").
. |
Court of Appeals |
