Hubert Patty v. Board of Professional Responsibility

Case Number
E2002-00499-SC-R3-CV

This is a direct appeal in a Board of Professional Responsibility case. A hearing committee found that the petitioner violated four disciplinary rules arising out of client representation, imposed a one-year suspension from the practice of law, and ordered the petitioner to complete courses in ethics and civil procedure at an accredited law school before applying for reinstatement. The chancery court upheld the hearing committee's findings and conclusions with respect to the violations, but reduced the suspension to 60 days and vacated the requirement for law school education. After our review of the record and applicable authority, we conclude that the chancery court properly affirmed the hearing committee's findings with regard to the petitioner's violations of the disciplinary rules, but we modify the length of the suspension to four months and the condition for reinstatement by requiring the petitioner to complete six hours of continuing legal education in ethics and twelve hours of continuing legal education in courses related to civil trial practice or civil litigation, in addition to the three hours of ethics and twelve hours of general credit required annually of attorneys in this State. The judgment is, therefore, affirmed as modified.

Authoring Judge
Justice E. Riley Anderson
Originating Judge
Frank V. Williams, III, - Sitting by Designation
Case Name
Hubert Patty v. Board of Professional Responsibility
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
No
Download PDF Version
PattyH.pdf35.49 KB