Melissa Martin et al v. Rolling Hills Hospital, LLC et al (Concur in Part;Dissent in Part)

Case Number
M2016-02214-SC-R11-CV

I agree with the majority’s clarification of the role of prejudice in the substantial compliance analysis required when a defendant challenges the plaintiff’s adherence to subsection (a)(2) of Tennessee Code Annotated section 29-26-121 (Supp. 2019) (“Section 121”).

Authoring Judge
Justice Holly Kirby
Originating Judge
Judge Michael Binkley
Case Name
Melissa Martin et al v. Rolling Hills Hospital, LLC et al (Concur in Part;Dissent in Part)
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
This is a dissenting opinion
Download PDF Version