Tammy Kline. for herself and for the use and benefit of Lori Michelle Kline, Kristy Lane Kline, and Diana Marie Kline v. Daniel Eyrich, et al.

Case Number
E2000-01890-SC-R11-CV

The primary issue in this case is whether a trial court may use the common fund doctrine in a wrongful death action to spread attorneys' fees equitably among the surviving beneficiaries of the action. The trial court consolidated two wrongful death actions, which were brought by the surviving spouse and children of the decedent, and it gave the surviving spouse control of the consolidated action. After the suit was settled, the trial court awarded the surviving spouse's attorney one-third of the settlement proceeds as a fee. On appeal, the children argued that the trial court improperly awarded fees to the surviving spouse's attorney from their share of the settlement because they possessed no contract with that attorney. A majority of the Court of Appeals held that although the award of fees could be proper under the common fund doctrine, the case should be remanded to resolve factual ambiguities in the record. We granted permission to appeal and hold that a trial court has the discretion to apply the common fund doctrine to the proceeds of a wrongful death action, thereby obliging the beneficiaries of that action to pay a reasonable fee to the attorney procuring the judgment or settlement. We also hold that the record contains no evidence showing that the trial court abused its discretion in awarding fees to the surviving spouse's attorney. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed in part and reversed in part.

Authoring Judge
Justice William M. Barker
Originating Judge
Judge Wheeler A. Rosenbalm
Case Name
Tammy Kline. for herself and for the use and benefit of Lori Michelle Kline, Kristy Lane Kline, and Diana Marie Kline v. Daniel Eyrich, et al.
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
No
Download PDF Version
klineta.pdf54.39 KB