Cynthia Bratton v. Michael Bratton - Concurring/Dissenting

Case Number
E2002-00432-SC-R11-CV

JANICE M. HOLDER, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part. I concur in the majority’s conclusion that postnuptial agreements are not contrary to public policy. I respectfully dissent, however, from that portion of the majority’s opinion concluding that the agreement at issue in the present case was not supported by adequate consideration.

Authoring Judge
Justice Janice M. Holder
Originating Judge
Chancellor Thomas R. Frierson, II
Case Name
Cynthia Bratton v. Michael Bratton - Concurring/Dissenting
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
This is a dissenting opinion
Download PDF Version
BrattonD.pdf46.75 KB