Springfield Investments, LLC et al v. Global Investments, LLC et al.

Case Number
E2014-01703-COA-R3-CV

This case involves a claim for, inter alia, intentional interference with business relationships. The plaintiffs allege that the defendants, owners and operators of a franchise pursuant to an agreement with Wendy's Old Fashioned Hamburgers Restaurant (“Wendy's') in Cleveland, Tennessee, interfered with the plaintiffs' ability to timely secure a franchise agreement with Wendy's to build a new restaurant in Cleveland. The plaintiffs alleged that the defendants improperly used a non-compete agreement, entered into in 1998 by the defendants and a brother of one of the plaintiffs, to object to Wendy's grant of the new franchise. Following a bench trial, the trial court found, inter alia, that the plaintiffs failed to establish the claim of intentional interference with business relationships. The court did enter a judgment, however, in favor of the plaintiffs for nominal damages in the amount of $500. The plaintiffs have appealed. Discerning no reversible error, we affirm.

Authoring Judge
Judge Thomas R. Frierson, II
Originating Judge
Chancellor W. Frank Brown, III
Case Name
Springfield Investments, LLC et al v. Global Investments, LLC et al.
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
No
Download PDF Version