Robbie Allen vs. Piggly Wiggly
w1999-00478-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Alan E. Highers
Trial Court Judge: Robert A. Lanier

Court of Appeals

W1999-00247-COA-R3-CV
W1999-00247-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge David R. Farmer
Trial Court Judge: Ron E. Harmon

Benton Court of Appeals

E1999-1531-COA-R3-CV
E1999-1531-COA-R3-CV

Court of Appeals

E1999-2339-COA-R3-CV
E1999-2339-COA-R3-CV

Hamilton Court of Appeals

R. E. Sharp, Jr. vs. Campbell Co. Bd. of Education & Campbell Co., TN
E1999-00397-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Houston M. Goddard

Campbell Court of Appeals

William A. Harvey vs. Lenoir City Utilities Board
E1999-00601-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Sr. Judge William H. Inman

Court of Appeals

State vs. Daniel Phillips, Jr.
E1999-01104-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Joe G. Riley

Anderson Court of Criminal Appeals

State ex rel Jerry N. Estes vs. Johnny Dewayne Hicks
E1999-01603-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks

Court of Appeals

John Constantine, II et al vs. Miller Ind., Inc. et al
E1999-01575-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge David Michael Swiney
Trial Court Judge: W. Frank Brown, III

Hamilton Court of Appeals

Robert Bowman, et al vs. Gatlinburg Condo Mgt.
E1999-02096-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Houston M. Goddard

Sevier Court of Appeals

E1999-02107-COA-R3-CV
E1999-02107-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Houston M. Goddard

Knox Court of Appeals

Deborah Ann Holland vs. Jason Keith Holland
E1999-00586-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge David Michael Swiney
In Re: Estate of Homer Haskell Mills, deceased Ronald Dean Mills vs. Peggy Sue Posey, et al

Sevier Court of Appeals

State vs. Fred Edmond Dean
E1998-00135-CCA-R3-PC
Authoring Judge: Judge David H. Welles

Sullivan Court of Criminal Appeals

F. G.Sutton vs. J.W. Sutton
E1999-00302-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge David Michael Swiney

Court of Appeals

Cleophus Davis v. Saturn Corporation
M1998-00862-WC-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: F. Lloyd Tatum, Senior Judge
Trial Court Judge: Hon. Robert L. Holloway
This workers' compensation appeal was referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann. _ 5-6- 225(e)(3) for hearing and reporting to the Supreme Court of findings of fact and conclusions of law.

Maury Workers Compensation Panel

Dean vs. Compton
M1998-00052-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Holly M. Kirby
Trial Court Judge: Frank G. Clement, Jr.

Davidson Court of Appeals

M1999-00468-COA-R3-CV
M1999-00468-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Sr. Judge William H. Inman
Trial Court Judge: Carol L. Mccoy

Davidson Court of Appeals

Lilly vs. Lilly
M1999-00681-COA-R3-CV

Sumner Court of Appeals

Gavin vs. Gavin
M1999-02755-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge William B. Cain
Trial Court Judge: Robert P. Hamilton

Court of Appeals

01C01-9811-CC-00453
01C01-9811-CC-00453

Williamson Court of Criminal Appeals

03A01-9904-CV-00133
03A01-9904-CV-00133

Sullivan Court of Appeals

03A01-9904-CV-00133
03A01-9904-CV-00133

Sullivan Court of Appeals

John Hessmer vs. State
M2004-02818-CCA-R3-HC
Authoring Judge: Judge Jerry Smith
Trial Court Judge: Monte D. Watkins
This matter is before the Court upon the State's motion to affirm the judgment of the trial court by memorandum opinion pursuant to Rule 20 of the Rules of the Court of Criminal Appeals. The petitioner has appealed the trial court's order summarily dismissing the petition for writ of habeas corpus. Upon a review of the record in this case, we are persuaded that the trial court was correct in summarily dismissing the habeas corpus petition and that this case meets the criteria for affirmance pursuant to Rule 20 of the Rules of the Court of Criminal Appeals. Accordingly, the State's motion is granted and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Davidson Court of Criminal Appeals

Timothy V. Bowling, v. Lori Goff, Becky West, and the Johnson City Police Department
E1998-00820-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Charles D. Susano, Jr.
Trial Court Judge: Judge Lewis W. May

The plaintiff, Timothy V. Bowling, filed a complaint in this action on January 16, 1998. His pleading, filed pro se, is entitled "Complaint for Civil Rights Violation," and seeks damages against twopolic officers of the Johnson City Police Department. The Deparmtne is also sued. The complaint is based upon the plaintiff's arrest for domestic violence, an arrest made by the individual defendants on March 16, 1993. It seeks money damages for violations of the plaintiff's civil rights. In the words of  the complaint, it seeks to invoke civil rights "[t]hat are indeed protected by both the United States Constitution, as well as the Tennessee Constitution. "The trial court dismissed the complaint becauseit found that the complaint was filed more than one year after the plaintiff's arrest. We affirm.

 

Court of Appeals

X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX

Scott Court of Appeals