Carlos Haynes v. State of Tennessee
W2004-00081-CCA-R3-PC
The petitioner, Carlos Haynes, pled guilty in the Madison County Circuit Court to one count of possession of over one-half ounce of marijuana with intent to sell and one count of possession of drug paraphernalia. He received a total effective sentence of two years incarceration in the Tennessee Department of Correction. Subsequently, the petitioner filed a petition for post-conviction relief, alleging that his counsel was ineffective and the trial court erred in failing to pursue the issue of the identity of the confidential informant whose tip led to the search of the petitioner’s home. After an evidentiary hearing, the post-conviction court dismissed the petition, and the petitioner now appeals. Upon review of the record and the parties’ briefs, we affirm the judgment of the post-conviction court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Norma McGee Ogle
Originating Judge:Judge Roger A. Page |
Madison County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 08/27/04 | |
State of Tennessee v. Robert Page - Concurring and Dissenting
W2003-01342-CCA-R3-CD
I am unable to join with the majority in concluding that the waiver provision of Tennessee Code Annotated section 40-18-110 is unconstitutional. Because the Defendant did not request that the jury be instructed as to facilitation, he has waived his right to challenge this issue on appeal. Accordingly, I would affirm the conviction.
Authoring Judge: Judge David G. Hayes
Originating Judge:Judge W. Fred Axley |
Shelby County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 08/26/04 | |
Luke N. Gibson, et al. v. Chrysler Corporation, et al.
W2002-03134-COA-R3-CV
This is an appeal from a judgment entered on a jury verdict for Defendant/Appellee. Plaintiff/Appellant, a minor, was allegedly injured when an integrated car seat in a vehicle manufactured and sold by Defendant/Appellee malfunctioned. Plaintiff/Appellant asserts that: (1) the jurors conducted unauthorized experimentation with certain exhibits, which constituted extraneous prejudicial information under Tenn. R. Evid. 606(b); (2) that there is no material evidence on which the jury could have based its verdict; (3) that the trial judge failed to properly perform her duty as thirteenth juror; (4) that the trial court erred in allowing an expert to testify outside the scope of his expertise in violation of McDaniel v. CSX Transportation, Inc., 955 S.W.2d 257 (Tenn. 1997); and (5) that the trial court erred, either under Tenn. R. Evid. 702 and 704 or on the theory of judicial estoppel, in excluding a portion of the testimony of a second expert. We affirm.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge W. Frank Crawford
Originating Judge:Judge Kay S. Robilio |
Shelby County | Court of Appeals | 08/26/04 | |
Michael Mitchell v. William Henegar, D/B/A Henegar Realty Company; and Geneva Brown, individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Fred Brown
E2003-01885-COA-R3-CV
Plaintiff sought rescission of a purchase of real property, and damages pursuant to the Consumer Protection Act. The Trial Court held plaintiff failed to carry his burden of proof on the issues presented. On appeal, we affirm.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel Pickens Franks
Originating Judge:Judge William E. Lantrip |
Anderson County | Court of Appeals | 08/26/04 | |
State of Tennessee v. Robert Page
W2003-01342-CCA-R3-CD
The Defendant, Robert Page, was convicted by a jury of the second degree murder of Roosevelt Burgess. The Defendant was subsequently sentenced as a Range II offender to thirty-eight years in the Department of Correction. In this direct appeal, the Defendant raises the following issues: 1) whether the evidence is sufficient to support the verdict; 2) whether the trial court improperly limited the impeachment of State witness Carrie Jones; 3) whether the trial court properly admitted a photograph of the victim; 4) whether the trial court committed error in providing supplemental jury instructions; 5) whether comments by the trial court compromised the Defendant’s right to a fair trial; and 6) whether the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury on the lesser-included offense of facilitation to commit second degree murder. Because the trial court committed reversible error in omitting a jury instruction on facilitation of second degree murder, we reverse the Defendant’s conviction and remand this matter for a new trial.
Authoring Judge: Judge David H. Welles
Originating Judge:Judge W. Fred Axley |
Shelby County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 08/26/04 | |
Donnie Wayne Johnson, Jr., v. City Roofing Company
W2003-01852-COA-R3-CV
This case is an appeal from an order granting Appellee’s motion for summary judgment. Appellant argues, as he did at trial, that this case involves genuine issues of material fact, rendering summary judgment inappropriate for this action. For the following reasons, we affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge Alan E. Highers
Originating Judge:Judge William B. Acree |
Obion County | Court of Appeals | 08/25/04 | |
Rachel Stephens v. John Manville International, Inc.
E2003-01068-WC-R3-CV
The trial court awarded the Plaintiff an additional 5 percent for an injury to her left arm for which she had been compensated. This award was supported essentially by the Plaintiff's testimony. She was also awarded benefits for an injury to her right arm and neck. The award for an additional 5 percent to the left arm is vacated. Otherwise, the judgment is affirmed.
Authoring Judge: William H. Inman, Sr. J.
Originating Judge:Jerri S. Bryant, Chancellor |
Knox County | Workers Compensation Panel | 08/25/04 | |
Susan Chales and James Charles v. Ruth Latham and Ralph Latham
E2003-00852-COA-R3-CV
In a dispute over an easement, the Trial Court awarded damages to plaintiffs for interference with use of easement, nuisance and punitive damages. On appeal, we affirm the award of compensatory damages, but vacate the award of punitive damages and remand to assess punitive damages in accordance with Hodges v. Toof & Co., 833.S.W.2d 896 (Tenn. 1992).
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel Pickens Franks
Originating Judge:Judge W. Dale Young |
Blount County | Court of Appeals | 08/25/04 | |
St. Paul Reinsurance Co., LTD, v. Robert Williams and Sherrod Jackson, Individually and D/B/A Pure Passion, Pure Passion, Inc. and Eugene Pugh
W2003-00473-COA-R3-CV
This case arises from events surrounding the shooting death of Decedent, Appellant’s son. Appellee filed a motion for summary judgment claiming its policy of insurance did not apply to the
Authoring Judge: Judge Alan E. Highers
Originating Judge:Chancellor Walter L. Evans |
Shelby County | Court of Appeals | 08/25/04 | |
Sheryl Heggs v. Wilson Inn Nashville-Elm Hill, Inc.
M2003-00919-COA-R3-CV
This appeal involves a dispute between a hotel and a guest who slipped on a wet tile floor as she was making her way to an elevator on one of the hotel's guest floors. The guest filed a negligence action against the hotel in the Circuit Court for Davidson County, and the hotel answered and filed a motion for summary judgment. The trial court granted the hotel's motion after determining, as a matter of law, that the hotel had satisfied its duty to the guest by setting out a yellow "wet floor" warning sign and that the guest was fifty percent or more at fault for her injuries. The guest has appealed. We have determined that the hotel has not demonstrated that it is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law and, therefore, we vacate the summary judgment.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge William C. Koch, Jr.
Originating Judge:Judge Thomas W. Brothers |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 08/25/04 | |
Victor Rivera v. Jeld-Wen, Inc.
M2003-01651-WC-R3-CV
In this case, the plaintiff whose arm was amputated as a result of a work-related injury had entered into a settlement agreement with his employer. The plaintiff claims this agreement obligated his employer to pay for an expensive, state-of-the-art myoelectric prosthesis. The trial court agreed and expressly found that the provision of the myoelectric arm was within the reasonable contemplation of the parties at the time of the agreement and compelled the employer to pay for it. The Panel has concluded that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed.
Authoring Judge: Patricia J. Cottrell, Sp. J.
Originating Judge:John A. Turnbull, Judge |
White County | Workers Compensation Panel | 08/25/04 | |
Jasmine Ali v. Eric Fisher, et al
E2003-00255-SC-R11-CV
We granted this appeal to determine whether an owner who negligently entrusted his car to another may be held vicariously liable for the driver's negligence in the operation of the car. The trial court submitted the case to the jury for allocation of fault on comparative fault principles, and the jury found the owner twenty percent (20%) at fault and the driver eighty percent (80%) at fault. The trial court later amended the judgment by holding that the owner-entrustor was vicariously liable for the negligence of the driver-entrustee and thus liable for all of the compensatory and punitive damages. The Court of Appeals held that the trial court erred in concluding that the owner-entrustor was vicariously liable for the driver-entrustee's actions and reinstated the initial judgment. After reviewing the record and applicable authority, we conclude that an owner-entrustor's liability for negligent entrustment does not result in vicarious liability for the negligence of the driver-entrustee and that the trial court erred in holding the owner-entrustor liable for all the damages. We therefore affirm the Court of Appeals' judgment and remand the case to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Authoring Judge: Justice E. Riley Anderson
Originating Judge:Judge John S. McLellan, III |
Sullivan County | Supreme Court | 08/25/04 | |
Samuel L. Rowe v. Sverdrup Technology, Inc. and
M2003-01467-WC-R3-CV
. In this appeal, the employer contends that the trial court erred by finding by a preponderance of the evidence that the employee's hip replacement surgery and subsequent disability were due to an injury that arose out of his employment. Specifically, the issue is whether the employee's injury resulted from a pre-existing cancerous condition of the right hip. We find no error and affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Roger A. Page, Sp. J.
Originating Judge:John E. Rollins, Judge |
Coffee County | Workers Compensation Panel | 08/25/04 | |
State of Tennessee v. Christopher Davis
M2001-01866-SC-DDT-DD
The defendant, Christopher A. Davis, was convicted of two counts of premeditated first degree murder,1 two counts of especially aggravated kidnapping, and two counts of especially aggravated robbery. The jury imposed death sentences for both counts of premeditated first degree murder after finding that evidence of three aggravating circumstances, i.e., (1) the defendant was previously convicted of one or more felonies whose statutory elements involved the use of violence to the person, (2) the murders were committed for the purpose of avoiding, interfering with, or preventing a lawful arrest of the defendant, and (3) the murders were knowingly committed, solicited, directed, or aided by the defendant while the defendant had a substantial role in committing or attempting to commit a robbery or kidnapping, outweighed evidence of mitigating circumstances beyond a reasonable doubt. In addition, the trial court sentenced the defendant to concurrent 25-year sentences for the especially aggravated kidnapping convictions to run consecutively to concurrent 25-year sentences for the especially aggravated robbery convictions. After the Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the convictions and the sentences, the case was automatically docketed in this Court. We entered an order specifying seven issues for oral argument, and we now hold as follows: (1) the evidence was sufficient to support the jury’s verdicts; (2) the trial court did not err in refusing to disqualify the District Attorney General; (3) the trial court did not err in refusing to allow defense counsel to withdraw; (4) the death sentences were not invalid on the ground that the aggravating circumstances were not set out in the indictment; (5) the trial court did not err in allowing the prosecution to establish the “prior violent felony” aggravating circumstance by relying on an offense committed as a juvenile; (6) the evidence was sufficient to support the jury’s finding of three aggravating circumstances beyond a reasonable doubt and its determination that the aggravating circumstances outweighed the evidence of mitigating circumstances beyond a reasonable doubt; and (7) the death sentences were not arbitrary or disproportionate. We also agree with the Court of Criminal Appeals’ conclusions with respect to the remaining issues, the relevant portions of which are included in the appendix to this opinion. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals.
Authoring Judge: Justice E. Riley Anderson
Originating Judge:Judge J. Randall Wyatt, Jr. |
Davidson County | Supreme Court | 08/25/04 | |
Patricia Conley, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Martha Stinson, Deceased v. State of Tennessee
M2002-00813-SC-R11-CV
We granted review in this case to address three issues: (1) whether the State is a “governmental
Authoring Judge: Justice E. Riley Anderson
Originating Judge:Commissioner W.R. Baker |
Supreme Court | 08/25/04 | ||
State of Tennessee v. Christopher Davis - Concurring and Dissenting
M2001-01866-SC-DDT-DD
Authoring Judge: Justice Adolpho E. Birch
Originating Judge:J. Randall Wyatt, Jr. |
Davidson County | Supreme Court | 08/25/04 | |
The City of Humboldt, et al. v. J.R. McKnight, et al.
M2002-02639-COA-R3-CV
This lawsuit is about the operation and funding of public schools educating the children in Gibson County. Since 1981 the county has not operated a county school system, and all K-12 students have been in schools operated by the municipal and special school systems. The county ceased operating schools when a 1981 Private Act created the Gibson County Special School District. This arrangement was ratified by a 2002 Public Act stating that where all K-12 students are eligible to be served by city and special school systems, the county is not required to operate a separate county school system or have a county board of education. The trial court held that the 2002 Act was unconstitutional as special legislation and that the 1981 Act, though constitutional, was illegal. It ordered the dissolution of the Gibson County Special School District and that the county undertake operation of the schools not included in the other municipal or special school systems within the county. The court further found that the county was required to levy a countywide property tax to fund the local share of education costs and divide the proceeds among all school systems in the county. We hold that the 2002 Act does not violate Article XI, Section 8 of the Tennessee Constitution and, consequently, there is no obligation for the county to operate a county school system. We also conclude that the facts do not establish any disparity of educational opportunity among the school systems in the county and, consequently, the principles and holdings in the Small Schools cases do not apply to require a specific organizational structure and do not preclude the method used in Gibson County. Finally, we conclude the county is not required to levy a countywide property tax for schools. Accordingly, we reverse the trial court's judgment.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Patricia J. Cottrell
Originating Judge:Chancellor Ellen Hobbs Lyle |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 08/25/04 | |
Jamie Edward Hines v. Terrell Lynn Simms
M2003-01459-COA-R3-CV
This appeal involves a custody dispute triggered by a paternity action. The trial court fashioned a permanent parenting plan which named Father the primary residential parent during the school year and Mother the primary residential parent during summer vacation. Mother appeals. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Patricia J. Cottrell
Originating Judge:Judge Muriel Robinson |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 08/24/04 | |
Rocky Garner v. Phil Breeden & Associates
M2002-03103-COA-R3-CV
Appellant sued Appellee for breach of contract or in the alternative for quantum meruit value of services rendered. At the conclusion of Plaintiff's proof the trial court sustained a motion for a directed verdict on behalf of Defendant as to the quantum meruit claim and further sustained that motion on a large portion of the contract claim. As to remaining portions of the contract claim the motion for a directed verdict was overruled, and Plaintiff voluntarily dismissed the remaining claims without prejudice. We hold that the trial court erred in granting the motion for a directed verdict as to the contract case but correctly granted a directed verdict as to quantum meruit. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded for trial on the contract issues.
Authoring Judge: Judge William B. Cain
Originating Judge:Chancellor Carol L. McCoy |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 08/24/04 | |
Bobbi Jo Fisher v. Tennessee Insurance Company - Concurring
E2004-00189-COA-R3-CV
While I concur in the majority’s decision to reverse and dismiss this case, I feel it necessary to concur separately to state my understanding that our holding in this case is limited to an insured’s claim for collision damage coverage only. I believe there may be public policy considerations that would need to be considered in a case involving liability, as opposed to collision, coverage. That question is not now before us, and I do not believe those public policy considerations are applicable in a case such as the one now before us involving an insurance claim solely for collision damage coverage. I, therefore, concur in the majority’s decision to reverse and dismiss.
Authoring Judge: Judge D. Michael Swiney
Originating Judge:Judge Harold Wimberly |
Knox County | Court of Appeals | 08/24/04 | |
Ricky Eugene Cofer v. State of Tennesse
E2003-01400-CCA-R3-PC
The petitioner, Ricky Eugene Cofer, appeals the order of the Circuit Court for Anderson County dismissing his post-conviction relief petition. The State has filed a motion requesting that this Court affirm the trial court's denial of relief pursuant to Rule 20, Rules of the Court of Criminal Appeals. The petitioner's claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel was previously determined on direct appeal. The petition was properly dismissed. Accordingly, the State's motion is granted and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Authoring Judge: Judge Norma McGee Ogle
Originating Judge:Judge James B. Scott, Jr. |
Anderson County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 08/24/04 | |
Robert Kendall Broadbent v. Shari Katherine Langhi Broadbent
M2003-00583-COA-R3-CV
This appeal involves a dispute over the responsibility for investment losses incurred by a spouse before and during the parties’ marriage. After only one year of marriage, the husband filed suit for divorce in the Circuit Court for Davidson County. The wife counterclaimed for divorce and, among other relief, sought alimony in solido to offset the loss of her separate property resulting from the husband’s aggressive stock market trading. Following a bench trial, the trial court granted the wife a divorce on the ground of inappropriate marital conduct and then, employing a comparative fault analysis, determined that the husband should pay the wife $51,500 in alimony in solido to reimburse her for her separate property lost in the stock market. The husband has appealed. We have determined that the wife is not entitled to be reimbursed for the losses caused by the husband’s investments.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge William C. Koch, Jr.
Originating Judge:Judge Marietta M. Shipley |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 08/24/04 | |
Kenneth A. Brasel, Sr., v. John Stanley Brasel, Sr. et al.
W2003-02965-COA-R3-CV
This is a child custody case. Father/Appellant appeals from the trial court’s Order, which
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge W. Frank Crawford
Originating Judge:Judge John R. McCarroll, Jr. |
Shelby County | Court of Appeals | 08/24/04 | |
Kyle Ann Wiltse v. Christopher Allen Wiltse
W2002-03132-COA-R3-CV
This case involves issues arising out of the parties’ divorce. The trial court divided the parties’ marital assets, awarded Appellee alimony in futuro, ordered Appellant to pay Appellee’s attorney’s fees, and ordered Appellant to pay for Appellee’s health insurance premiums. For the following reasons, we affirm in part, modify in part, and remand for any further proceedings.
Authoring Judge: Judge Alan E. Highers
Originating Judge:Judge James F. Russell |
Shelby County | Court of Appeals | 08/24/04 | |
Bobbi Jo Fisher v. Tennessee Insurance Company
E2004-00189-COA-R3-CV
The defendant issued a policy of automobile insurance to the plaintiff which provided coverage for liability claims and for collision damage, but each of these insuring agreements was subject to an exclusion of coverage if the insured automobile was being operated by a non-licensed driver at the time of the accident giving rise to the claim. The plaintiff loaned her Pontiac to a non-licensed driver under the mistaken belief that he was properly licensed. The trial judge found that the plaintiff reasonably believed that her permittee had a valid driver’s license and allowed recovery. We reverse and dismiss.
Authoring Judge: Sr. Judge William H. Inman
Originating Judge:Judge Harold Wimberly |
Knox County | Court of Appeals | 08/24/04 |