Please enter some keywords to search.
| Nancy Bloom vs. Douglas Bloom
W1998-00365-COA-R3-CV
This is a divorce case. The parties were married for eighteen years and had a fifteen year old son. The wife was granted the divorce. The wife was awarded, inter alia, the marital home and the equity in it, 60% of the value of various financial assets, her automobile, and various household furnishings. Custody of the parties' son was awarded to the wife, and the husband was granted supervised visitation. The husband was ordered to pay child support. The wife was awarded 60 months of rehabilitative alimony, with the rate of rehabilitative alimony to increase when the husband's child support obligation ends. The wife's request for attorney's fees was denied. The husband appeals the division of the marital property and the amount of rehabilitative alimony awarded. The wife appeals the denial of her request for attorney's fees. We affirm, finding that the preponderance of the evidence supports the trial court's division of the marital property, the award of alimony, and the denial of the wife's request for attorney's fees.
Authoring Judge: Judge Holly M. Kirby
Originating Judge:Kay S. Robilio |
Shelby County | Court of Appeals | 09/14/00 | |
| Fillmore vs. Fillmore
M1999-00714-COA-R3-CV
This appeal arises from a dispute between Appellant Stephen Douglas Fillmore and Appellee Karen Leigh (Anderson) Fillmore regarding the terms of their divorce. The court issued a Final Decree of Divorce, divided the parties' marital property and debts, and awarded Ms. Anderson alimony in solido. In addition, the court awarded custody of the one minor child to Ms. Anderson and set a child support amount based on the appropriate guidelines. On appeal, Mr. Fillmore argues that the trial court erred in its valuation of certain marital property, improperly awarded alimony in solido, and failed to include as a marital debt a pre-marital debt of Mr. Fillmore. In addition, Mr. Fillmore argues that the trial court improperly calculated his child support obligation based on his current income. We affirm the ruling of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge David R. Farmer
Originating Judge:Carol A. Catalano |
Robertson County | Court of Appeals | 09/14/00 | |
| American Cable Corp. vs. ACI Management, Inc., et al
M1997-00280-COA-R3-CV
This appeal involves a legal dispute arising out of a contract to install television cable in Alabama and Mississippi. After the corporation that installed the cable did not receive full payment for its work, it filed suit in the Chancery Court for Davidson County Tennessee against the corporation and partnership that hired it and the president of the defendant corporation. The trial court granted a summary judgment dismissing the claims against the defendant corporation's president, and the installer took a default judgment against the corporation for $1,059,743. On this appeal, the installer takes issue with the summary judgment dismissing its claims against the defendant corporation's president. We have determined that the trial court properly granted the summary judgment because the installer failed to demonstrate that it will be able to prove all the essential elements of its tort claims against the defendant corporation's president.
Authoring Judge: Judge William C. Koch, Jr.
Originating Judge:Irvin H. Kilcrease, Jr. |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 09/14/00 | |
| Levenhagen vs. Levenhagen
M1998-00967-COA-R3-CV
Husband appeals the trial court's refusal to vacate its order divorcing the parties, claiming the order is void because it failed to include an affirmative finding that the parties made adequate provision by written agreement for the custody and maintenance of their children. In addition, Husband contends that the trial court violated his due process rights by suspending his visitation with the couple's children until he received counseling, and then ordering supervised visitation. He also maintains that the trial court improperly based its finding that he was guilty of criminal contempt for failure to pay child support on insufficient evidence. Husband claims he was entitled to a jury trial on the contempt issue. We affirm the trial court in all respects.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Patricia J. Cottrell
Originating Judge:Lee Russell |
Lincoln County | Court of Appeals | 09/14/00 | |
| Michael Alger vs. Corrections Corp.
W2000-00500-COA-R3-CV
An inmate sued Corrections Corporation of America and various individuals alleging failure to provide dental and medical care. The trial court dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The judgment of the trial court is reversed in part and affirmed in part.
Authoring Judge: Judge David R. Farmer
Originating Judge:Jon Kerry Blackwood |
Hardeman County | Court of Appeals | 09/13/00 | |
| E1999-02594-COA-R3-CV
E1999-02594-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Originating Judge:William R. Brewer |
Blount County | Court of Appeals | 09/12/00 | |
| E2000-00256-COA-R3-CV
E2000-00256-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Originating Judge:Wheeler A. Rosenbalm |
Knox County | Court of Appeals | 09/12/00 | |
| James Karls vs. Percy Pitzer, et al
W1999-01107-COA-R3-CV
This is an appeal from the trial court's order dismissing a petition for writ of habeas corpus for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. We affirm the ruling of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge David R. Farmer
Originating Judge:Jon Kerry Blackwood |
Hardeman County | Court of Appeals | 09/12/00 | |
| Clementine Newman vs. Allstate Insurance Co.
W1999-02064-COA-R3-CV
Automobile owner sued body shop and her insurance company for alleged faulty repairs to vehicle after it was involved in a collision. The body shop repaired what the insurance company authorized, but owner initially claimed other damages which the insurance company and body shop determined were not a result of the collision. During attempts to resolve the dispute, body shop was willing to repair anything authorized by the insurance company, but requested the owner to pay the deductible and retrieve her automobile from their facility. Owner refused to take the automobile, and the body shop, after notification to her, started charging storage charges. In the suit that was initially tried in general sessions court, then de novo in the circuit court, owner sought to recover storage charges paid an additional award for other damage to her vehicle and for relief under the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act. The trial court awarded owner a judgment against the insurance company for additional damages and denied her claims under the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act and for repayment of the storage charges. Owner has appealed.
Authoring Judge: Judge W. Frank Crawford
Originating Judge:Robert L. Childers |
Shelby County | Court of Appeals | 09/12/00 | |
| Sara T. McBride v. Kenneth A. McBride
E1999-02562-COA-R3-CV
Kenneth A. McBride appealed from an Order of the Chancellor confirming the Referee's Report that concluded McBride had offered no new evidence on the issue of reducing child support, which had been previously adjudicated. We affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge Herschel P. Franks
Originating Judge:Chancellor John F. Weaver |
Knox County | Court of Appeals | 09/07/00 | |
| Robert B. Turner, et al v. John Louis Kinser
E1999-01201-COA-R3-CV
By this suit the Plaintiffs seek a declaration that they are entitled to four separate prescriptive easements across property owned by the Defendant. Prior to the commencement of trial the Defendant conceded that the Plaintiffs were entitled to one easement and the Plaintiffs conceded that they were not entitled to another one. The Trial Court found in favor of the Plaintiffs as to the remaining two easements, resulting in this appeal. We affirm.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Houston M. Goddard
Originating Judge:Chancellor Thomas R. Frierson, II |
Greene County | Court of Appeals | 09/07/00 | |
| Diana Lynn Stinnett v. Jack Stinnett
01210-COA-R3-CV
This is an appeal in a divorce case of the Trial Court’s denial of Wife’s Motion seeking postjudgment interest. The Judgment was satisfied three years and four months after it was entered. The Motion for post-judgment interest was filed three months after the Judgment was paid. The Trial Court denied post-judgment interest on two grounds. The first was the Trial Court’s finding of an accord and satisfaction resulting from Husband’s payment of the judgment without interest. The Trial Court also held it would be unconscionable and inequitable for Husband to pay post-judgment interest. The Trial Court then exercised its discretion to deny post-judgment interest. Wife argues that the Trial Court can not deny post judgment interest for equitable reasons, that Husband failed to prove an accord and satisfaction, and that the accord and satisfaction affirmative defense may not be raised for the first time during legal argument, cannot be established without proof, and is waived if not pleaded. We hold the Trial Court erred, reverse the Judgment of the Trial Court, and remand the case for further proceedings. To avoid the appearance of impropriety or lack of impartiality, the Trial Judge is to recuse himself from those further proceedings. Tenn. R. App. R. 3; Judgment of the Trial Court Reversed; Case Remanded
Authoring Judge: Judge D. Michael Swiney
Originating Judge:Judge Bill Swann |
Knox County | Court of Appeals | 09/07/00 | |
| Signal Capital Corpooration, et a.,l v. Signal One, LLC, et al.
E2000-00140-COA-R3-CV
This appeal questions whether a forum selection clause is valid and enforceable against the Plaintiffs, Larry Wells and Signal Capital Corporation. Pursuant to the forum selection clause, Signal One LLC and NationsBanc Capital Corporation filed a motion to dismiss for improper venue. The Trial Court granted the motion to dismiss by finding the forum selection clause was valid. We affirm.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Houston M. Goddard
Originating Judge:Chancellor W. Frank Brown, III |
Hamilton County | Court of Appeals | 09/07/00 | |
| John W. Johnson v. Bernice Wade, et al.
W1999-01651-COA-R3-CV
This appeal arises from an action for ejectment filed by Plaintiff John W. Johnson ("Plaintiff") against Defendant Bernice Wade ("Defendant"). Plaintiff filed suit in the Gibson County Circuit Court alleging that he was the sole owner of the tract of land where both Plaintiff's and Defendant's residences are located. Prior to Defendant's filing on an answer, Plaintiff filed a motion for default judgment. Thereafter, Defendant filed an answer, a motion to dismiss, and a motion to compel Plaintiff to appear for deposition. Following Plaintiff's failure to appear for deposition, failure to prepare an order as directed by the court, and an attempt to file a premature appeal, the trial court dismissed Plaintiff's case for failure to properly prosecute. Plaintiff appeals.
Authoring Judge: Judge Alan E. Highers
Originating Judge:Judge Dick Jerman, Jr. |
Gibson County | Court of Appeals | 09/06/00 | |
| Home Builders Assoc. of Middle TN vs. Maury Co.
M1999-02383-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Ben H. Cantrell
Originating Judge:Stella L. Hargrove |
Maury County | Court of Appeals | 08/31/00 | |
| Miller vs. Miller
M1999-00724-COA-R3-CV
In this divorce, both Husband and Wife have appealed contesting the trial court's division of marital property and alimony awards. The division of marital property is affirmed, alimony awards are modified, and the case is remanded for a determination of the value of Husband's retirement plan and a proper division thereof.
Authoring Judge: Judge W. Frank Crawford
Originating Judge:Muriel Robinson |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 08/31/00 | |
| Cruse vs. Peak
M1999-02228-COA-R3-CV
This appeal arises from the trial court's refusal to grant the appellant's request for visitation with her granddaughter. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Ben H. Cantrell
Originating Judge:Muriel Robinson |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 08/31/00 | |
| Home Builders Assoc. of Middle TN vs. Maury Co.
M1999-02383-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Ben H. Cantrell
Originating Judge:Stella L. Hargrove |
Maury County | Court of Appeals | 08/31/00 | |
| Tennessee Farmers vs. Judy Cobb, et al
W1999-01729-COA-R3-CV
This appeal involves a motion to set aside a default judgment. The trial court entered a default judgment against the defendants based on their failure to respond to the lawsuit. Seven months later, the defendants filed a motion to set aside the default judgment. The trial court denied the motion, and the defendants appealed. We affirm, finding no abuse of discretion in the denial of the motion to set aside the default.
Authoring Judge: Judge Holly M. Kirby
Originating Judge:J. Steven Stafford |
Dyer County | Court of Appeals | 08/31/00 | |
| Miller vs. Miller
M1999-00724-COA-R3-CV
In this divorce, both Husband and Wife have appealed contesting the trial court's division of marital property and alimony awards. The division of marital property is affirmed, alimony awards are modified, and the case is remanded for a determination of the value of Husband's retirement plan and a proper division thereof.
Authoring Judge: Judge W. Frank Crawford
Originating Judge:Muriel Robinson |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 08/31/00 | |
| Howard vs. Howard
M1999-00670-COA-R3-CV
This appeal arises from a dispute over a contractual provision in a Marital Dissolution Agreement ("MDA") between the parties. Susan Trabue Howard ("Mother") filed a Petition for Enforcement of Contractual Obligation, alleging that Robert Mark Howard ("Father") had failed to abide with a provision in the MDA providing that Father would be responsible for Daughter's "related costs of education." The court below found in favor of Mother, holding that Father was responsible for all of Daughter's expenses for the time specified in MDA. Father appeals.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Alan E. Highers
Originating Judge:Russell Heldman |
Williamson County | Court of Appeals | 08/31/00 | |
| Sloan vs. Perryman
M1999-00828-COA-R3-CV
This appeal arises from a breach of contract suit and action to assert priority of a mechanics lien filed by Jason Sloan ("Contractor") against Shelby Ray Perryman ("Owners") and First Farmers & Merchants National Bank ("Bank"). Contractor sought recovery for labor and materials under the contract including expenses that exceeded Contractor's original bid price. In the alternative, Contractor sought recovery under quantum meruit. The court granted Bank's motion for summary judgment on the issue of priority of liens. Following trial, the court awarded Contractor damages under an implied contract theory, limiting Contractor's recovery to the bid price. In addition, the court denied Contractor's claim for alternative recovery in quantum meruit. Contractor appeals.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Alan E. Highers
Originating Judge:Stella L. Hargrove |
Maury County | Court of Appeals | 08/31/00 | |
| Union Planters Bank vs. Choate
M1999-01268-COA-R3-CV
This appeal arises from a breach of contract case filed against Mickie Davis ("Davis") by Carole Choate ("Choate"). Choate alleged that Davis breached her contractual and fiduciary duties by authorizing release of funds to Rochford Realty ("Rochford") for a construction project. The trial court granted Davis' motion for summary judgment. Choate appeals.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Alan E. Highers
Originating Judge:Ellen Hobbs Lyle |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 08/31/00 | |
| Shuman vs. Parkhurst
M1999-02043-COA-R3-CV
James Parkhurst d/b/a Parkhurst Home Improvement appeals the trial court's final judgment awarding Ken Shuman $8,021.14 in actual damages for breach of oral construction contract and $2,406.33 in attorney's fees based upon a finding of fraud in violation of the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act. Parkhurst raised two issues on appeal, contending that the damages awarded in this home construction dispute were not legally warranted and that the trial court erred in finding fraud, therefore justifying an award for attorney's fees under the Act. We conclude that Shuman presented sufficient proof to find a violation of the Act and to support his claim for damages and for attorney's fees. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court's judgment.
Authoring Judge: Judge David R. Farmer
Originating Judge:Carol L. Soloman |
Sumner County | Court of Appeals | 08/31/00 | |
| Scholz vs. S.B. International
M1997-00215-COA-R3-CV
This appeal arises from a dispute over the severance benefits in an employment contract. Following his termination, a corporate officer filed suit against his former employer in the Chancery Court for Davidson County seeking his severance benefits. The employer asserted that its former officer was not entitled to the severance benefits. Following a jury trial, the trial court entered a judgment awarding the officer $111,623.33 but denying his requests for prejudgment interest and discretionary costs. On this appeal, the officer asserts that the trial court erred by failing to award him prejudgment interest and discretionary costs. We agree and, therefore, remand the case for further proceedings.
Authoring Judge: Judge William C. Koch, Jr.
Originating Judge:Ellen Hobbs Lyle |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 08/31/00 |