Please enter some keywords to search.
| Hankins vs. Seaton
03A01-9710-CV-00468
|
Court of Appeals | 06/25/98 | ||
| Atkins vs. Grooms
03A01-9708-JV-00337
|
Court of Appeals | 06/25/98 | ||
| Eblen vs. Johnson
03A01-9709-CH-00423
|
Court of Appeals | 06/25/98 | ||
| Purkey vs. Purkey
03A01-9707-CV-00317
|
Court of Appeals | 06/25/98 | ||
| Canonie vs. Tennessee
03A01-9710-CH-00481
|
Court of Appeals | 06/25/98 | ||
| Roach vs. Renfro
03A01-9711-CH-00517
|
Court of Appeals | 06/25/98 | ||
| Stone vs. Stone
M1997-00218-COA-R3-CV
This appeal involves a former spouse's efforts to extricate himself from the spousal support obligations contained in a marital dissolution agreement. Approximately one year after the entry of the divorce decree approving the agreement, the former husband requested the Chancery Court for Putnam County to set the agreement aside because he did not have independent legal advice and his judgment was impaired by antidepressant medication when he signed the agreement. The trial court modified portions of the decree but did not relieve the former husband of his spousal support obligation. Thereafter, the former husband filed a second motion seeking to terminate or reduce his spousal support obligations because of his former wife's improved financial circumstances. The trial court again declined to relieve the former husband of his obligation to pay spousal support. On this appeal, the former husband renews his argument that he should no longer be required pay spousal support because of his former wife's improved financial circumstance and his own weakened financial condition. We affirm the trial court's decision that the former husband has failed to prove the existence of a substantial, material change in circumstances that would warrant modifying his spousal support obligation.
Authoring Judge: Judge William C. Koch, Jr.
Originating Judge:Vernon Neal |
Putnam County | Court of Appeals | 06/23/98 | |
| Albert Gregurek v. Swope Motors
M2002-02854-COA-R3-CV
This case involves an interlocutory appeal from the trial court's denial of the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss on grounds of lack of personal jurisdiction and/or Motion for Summary Judgment. We reverse.
Originating Judge:J. Curtis Smith |
Marion County | Court of Appeals | 06/22/98 | |
| 01A01-9606-CV-00260
01A01-9606-CV-00260
Originating Judge:Henry Denmark Bell |
Williamson County | Court of Appeals | 06/19/98 | |
| Simmons, M.D. vs. Johnson
01A01-9709-CH-00495
Originating Judge:Carol L. Mccoy |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 06/19/98 | |
| 01A01-9709-CH-00496
01A01-9709-CH-00496
Originating Judge:Irvin H. Kilcrease, Jr. |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 06/19/98 | |
| Lyle vs. Michaelson Asset Management
01A01-9710-CV-00549
Originating Judge:Walter C. Kurtz |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 06/19/98 | |
| Kinney vs. Hale
01A01-9709-CV-00465
Originating Judge:Charles D. Haston, Sr. |
Warren County | Court of Appeals | 06/19/98 | |
| Pamela & Sammy Gordon vs. Dr. Donald Wilson M.D.
02A01-9611-CV-00282
Originating Judge:Whit A. Lafon |
Madison County | Court of Appeals | 06/17/98 | |
| Constance Yance vs. Jerry Yance
02A01-9710-CH-00275
Originating Judge:George R. Ellis |
Gibson County | Court of Appeals | 06/17/98 | |
| 07-93-017-CC
07-93-017-CC
Originating Judge:A. Andrew Jackson |
Dickson County | Court of Appeals | 06/16/98 | |
| 01A01-9707-CH-00348
01A01-9707-CH-00348
Originating Judge:Jane W. Wheatcraft |
Sumner County | Court of Appeals | 06/16/98 | |
| Long, et. ux. vs. Landmark Television of TN
01A01-9709-CV-00483
Originating Judge:Walter C. Kurtz |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 06/16/98 | |
| Fagg vs. County of Franklin
01A01-9710-CV-00589
Originating Judge:Thomas W. Graham |
Franklin County | Court of Appeals | 06/16/98 | |
| Phillip Hall vs. Donal Campbell, et al
02A01-9801-CV-00015
Originating Judge:Joseph H. Walker, III |
Lauderdale County | Court of Appeals | 06/16/98 | |
| John Du Ban vs. Gary Wilkinson
02A01-9712-CV-00314
Originating Judge:Karen R. Williams |
Shelby County | Court of Appeals | 06/15/98 | |
| X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
Originating Judge:Chester S. Rainwater |
Sevier County | Court of Appeals | 06/15/98 | |
| National Healthcare L.P. vs. Sparta Medical Investors
01A01-9712-CH-00718
|
Court of Appeals | 06/12/98 | ||
| Cathy P. Sprayberry-Gravitt, v. David Baker, Director of Schools for the Clarksville-Montgomery County Schools, et al.
01A01-9707-CH-00295
We have reviewed appellee's Petition to Rehear. Counsel correctly points out that the Education Improvement Act of 1992 specified certain duties in the County Administration of education. The two sections cited [T.C.A. 49-2- 301(f)(10) and T.C.A. 49-2-203(a)(1)] do refer to "recommendation" of the superintendent to the local board of education. It is the duty of the superintendent to recommend teachers who qualify and the board "elects" such teachers to tenure status as it deems appropriate.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Henry F. Todd
|
Montgomery County | Court of Appeals | 06/12/98 | |
| Barbara Pierce vs. State
02A01-9710-BC-00245
|
Court of Appeals | 06/12/98 |