03A01-9707-CV-00292
03A01-9707-CV-00292
|
Court of Appeals | 01/20/98 | ||
Smiley, et. al. vs. Walker
01A01-9704-JV-00164
Originating Judge:William C. Koch |
Court of Appeals | 01/16/98 | ||
Smiley, et. al. vs. Walker
01A01-9704-JV-00164
Originating Judge:Andrew J. Shookhoff |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 01/16/98 | |
Griffin (Meyer) vs. Griffin
01A01-9704-CV-00190
Originating Judge:Muriel Robinson |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 01/16/98 | |
Dowling, aka: Berle
01A01-9706-PB-00268
Originating Judge:Frank G. Clement, Jr. |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 01/16/98 | |
Dowling, aka: Berle
01A01-9706-PB-00268
|
Court of Appeals | 01/16/98 | ||
Knight vs. City of Gallatin
01A01-9705-CV-00213
Originating Judge:Thomas Goodall |
Court of Appeals | 01/16/98 | ||
Wilson vs. Mcwherter
01A01-9706-CV-00266
Originating Judge:Thomas W. Brothers |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 01/16/98 | |
City of Milan Hosp., et al vs. Rex Ferrell, et al
02A01-9703-CH-00068
Originating Judge:George R. Ellis |
Gibson County | Court of Appeals | 01/15/98 | |
Emma Smith vs. Hubert Smith
02A01-9709-CV-00223
Originating Judge:Filed |
Shelby County | Court of Appeals | 01/14/98 | |
Harvell vs. Williams
01A01-9706-CH-00258
Originating Judge:Jim T. Hamilton |
Maury County | Court of Appeals | 01/14/98 | |
Ogburn vs. Dept. of Corrections
01A01-9707-CH-00284
Originating Judge:Carol L. Mccoy |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 01/14/98 | |
Ogburn vs. Dept. of Corrections
01A01-9707-CH-00284
Originating Judge:William C. Koch |
Court of Appeals | 01/14/98 | ||
Billie Russell vs. Pakkala M.D.
02A01-9703-CV-00053
Originating Judge:Jon Kerry Blackwood |
Hardeman County | Court of Appeals | 01/14/98 | |
Stinson vs. 138 Fifth Avenue South, et. al.
01A01-9702-CV-00060
Originating Judge:Hamilton V. Gayden, Jr. |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 01/14/98 | |
IN RE: Estate of O'Neal
03A01-9706-CH-00214
|
Court of Appeals | 01/14/98 | ||
Ridley vs. Ridley
03A01-9708-GS-00350
|
Court of Appeals | 01/13/98 | ||
Williamson vs. Sanders
03A01-9705-JV-00184
|
Court of Appeals | 01/13/98 | ||
Haren vs. Haren
03A01-9707-CV-00253
|
Court of Appeals | 01/13/98 | ||
Henson vs. Carte r
03A01-9706-CV-00230
|
Court of Appeals | 01/13/98 | ||
Graves vs. Grady's
03A01-9708-CV-00336
|
Court of Appeals | 01/13/98 | ||
Deroyal vs. Johnson
03A01-9708-CH-00328
|
Claiborne County | Court of Appeals | 01/13/98 | |
M & M vs. Maples
03A01-9705-CH-00171
|
Court of Appeals | 01/12/98 | ||
Robert J. McCurley, Patricia G. McCurley, v. City of Jackson, Tennessee, Charles Farmer, and J.B.Glassman and wife, Brenda Glassman, and Harold Angus
02A01-9703-CV-00059
This is an action in negligence arising out of the June 1993 acts of the appellant, Harold Angus, in demolishing the “Glassman” building, located at 111 North Highland Avenue in Jackson, pursuant to a contract with the city. Angus’ demolition of the building, which had been declared condemned by the city code, is not disputed. Nor is it disputed that, as a result of the building’s demolition, damage was sustained to the building located adjacent thereto, identified as the “Carmen’s” building, and owned by the appellees, Robert J. McCurley and wife, Patricia G. McCurley.1 The two buildings shared a common “party wall.” At issue in this case is whether Angus was negligent in its demolition of the Glassman building so as to be held legally accountable to the McCurleys for the damages they sustained. The case proceeded to a trial by jury where, at the close of all proof, the trial court directed a verdict in favor of the appellees on the issue of liability.2 Angus has appealed challenging the correctness of the trial judge’s decision in this regard. For the reasons hereinafter stated, we reverse and remand for a new trial.
Authoring Judge: Judge David R. Farmer
Originating Judge:Judge Whit A. Lafon |
Madison County | Court of Appeals | 01/09/98 | |
Tennessee Department of Health, Division of Health Related Boards and The Board of Medical Examiners, v. W. Dwight Frisbee, M.D.
01A01-9511-CH-00540
This appeal presents an issue of first impression concerning the evidentiary standards applicable to disciplinary proceedings involving licensed physicians. The Tennessee Department of Health perfected an interlocutory appeal to the Chancery Court for Davidson County after an administrative law judge disqualified its expert witness for failing to satisfy the locality rule generally applicable in medical malpractice cases. The trial court reversed the administrative law judge’s decision after concluding that a physician’s conduct should be measured by a statewide standard of minimum competency rather than a particularized local standard of care. While the administrative law judge’s decision was correct with regard to two of thecharges, we affirm the trial court’s decision in part because several of the charges in this proceeding only require proof that a physician has failed to meet statewide, minimal competency standards.
Authoring Judge: Judge William C. Koch, Jr.
Originating Judge:Chancellor Robert S. Brandt |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 01/09/98 |