APPELLATE COURT OPINIONS

Please enter some keywords to search.
Carrie Marsh vs. Christopher Sensabaugh

W2001-00016-COA-R3-JV
This is a child custody case involving the child's natural father and a third-party, the maternal aunt. The trial court held in favor of the maternal aunt, upon a determination the father was an unfit parent. The court based its decision on the father's previous charge of contempt for failure to pay child support, previous visitation practices, and lack of knowledge regarding the child's educational status, such as her teachers, grades and attendance at parent-teacher conferences. Father appeals the trial court's decision. For the reasons below, we affirm the ruling of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge David R. Farmer
Originating Judge:J. Roland Reid
Haywood County Court of Appeals 08/27/01
Howard Zoldessy vs. Ingrid Davis, et al

E2000-02526-COA-R3-CV
Upon the application of Howard Zoldessy, a temporary injunction was issued by the trial court against the defendants, Ingrid Davis and Arthur Davis. The Davises are the parents of Zoldessy's deceased wife and the grandparents of Zoldessy's daughter, Rachel. The injunction in question prohibits the defendants "from coming about [Howard Zoldessy] and his daughter, Rachel Zoldessy, or contacting him in any manner whatsoever." Following a bench trial, the trial court found that both defendants had committed willful criminal contempt by "coming about [Zoldessy's] residence on October 4, 1999." Each defendant was sentenced to 48 hours imprisonment for their contempt. Mr. Davis was also found in contempt for sending letters to Zoldessy and was sentenced to an additional term of imprisonment of 48 hours. The defendants appeal the trial court's findings of contempt, as well as the sentences imposed. We affirm the finding of contempt as to the letters sent to Zoldessy; however, we reverse the finding of contempt for the defendants' purported "coming about" Zoldessy and his daughter.
Authoring Judge: Judge Charles D. Susano, Jr.
Originating Judge:William E. Lantrip
Anderson County Court of Appeals 08/27/01
Philip Owens vs Bristol Motor Speedway, Inc.

E2000-02667-COA-R3-CV
In this putative class action suit, the plaintiff, Philip Owens, alleges that the defendant, Bristol Motor Speedway, Inc. ("Bristol Speedway"), engaged in a conspiracy to fix the prices of souvenirs sold at its racetrack. The trial court denied certification of the alleged class and granted Bristol Speedway's motion for summary judgment as to the plaintiff's individual claims. We affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge Charles D. Susano, Jr.
Originating Judge:Richard E. Ladd
Sullivan County Court of Appeals 08/27/01
Ella McCain, Conservator

W2000-02218-COA-R3-CV
This is a personal injury case arising from a vehicle/pedestrian accident. A pedestrian wandered from the nursing home at which he resided and began walking alongside a roadway. The defendant driver saw the pedestrian as he was driving on the roadway. As the driver approached, the pedestrian suddenly stepped into the roadway and was struck by the defendant's truck. The pedestrian suffered significant injuries. The pedestrian's daughter, as his conservator, filed suit against the defendant driver. At the conclusion of the plaintiff's proof, the defendant driver moved for a directed verdict on the grounds that there was insufficient evidence that the defendant driver was negligent. The trial court granted a directed verdict for the defendant driver and the plaintiff now appeals. We affirm, finding that the plaintiff failed to adduce evidence from which a reasonable jury might conclude that the defendant driver was negligent.
Authoring Judge: Judge Holly M. Kirby
Originating Judge:Jon Kerry Blackwood
Fayette County Court of Appeals 08/27/01
Ronald Scott Revis v. Roane County, Tennessee,

E2000-01709-WC-R3-CV
The trial court dismissed the complaint finding the injury did not arise out of and in the course of employment. On appeal it was determined the injury arose out of employment but did not occur in the course of employment. Judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Authoring Judge: Thayer, Sp. J.
Originating Judge:Russell E. Simmons, Jr., Circuit Judge
Knox County Workers Compensation Panel 08/27/01
Comm. DOT vs. Frances Patrick & Frank Duncan

W2001-00397-COA-R3-CV
This appeal involves the owner of an undivided five-sixths interest in property acquiring the remaining one-sixth interest from her co-tenants under the doctrine of title by prescription. The circuit court made finding of facts indicating that the prescriptive holder of the property held the property exclusively and uninterrupted for more than a twenty year period. Further, the circuit court found that no co-tenants were under a disability to assert their rights during the twenty year period and that no permission was given to the prescriptive holder to possess the property. Based on these findings of fact, the circuit court ruled that under the doctrine of title by prescription, the prescriptive holder had acquired full title in the property. For the following reasons, we affirm the decision of the circuit court.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Alan E. Highers
Originating Judge:C. Creed Mcginley
Hardin County Court of Appeals 08/27/01
Suzanne Jones vs. Metro Elevator Co.

W2000-02002-COA-R3-CV
This appeal involves claims for injuries sustained by the plaintiff while riding in an elevator. The plaintiff brought suit against numerous parties including the company managing the building and the company under contract to service the elevators in the building. The circuit court granted a motion for summary judgment as to the company managing the building. The case proceeded to trial, however, against the company under contract to service the elevators. After the circuit court refused to instruct the jury on the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the elevator service provider. The plaintiff appeals the grant of summary judgment and the refusal to instruct the jury on the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur and for the following reasons, we affirm.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Alan E. Highers
Originating Judge:Mark Agee
Madison County Court of Appeals 08/27/01
Barbara Gaskins vs. Roger Gaskins

E2000-02915-COA-R3-CV
This appeal from the Circuit Court of Greene County questions whether the Trial Court erred in awarding Ms. Gaskins alimony for a seven year period. Mr. Gaskins appeals the decision of the Circuit Court of Greene County. We affirm the decision of the Trial Court as modified and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. We adjudge costs of the appeal against the Appellant, Roger Arthur Gaskins, and his surety.
Authoring Judge: Judge Houston M. Goddard
Originating Judge:Ben K. Wexler
Greene County Court of Appeals 08/27/01
Reginald Webb v. State of Tennessee

W2000-01895-CCA-R3-PC

Petitioner appeals the denial of post-conviction relief by the Shelby County Criminal Court. He contends he received ineffective assistance of counsel at his jury trial where he was convicted of second degree murder. We affirm.

Authoring Judge: Judge Joe G. Riley
Originating Judge:Judge Bernie Weinman
Shelby County Court of Criminal Appeals 08/27/01
United States Pipe & Foundry Company v. Steven L. Camp

E2000-01198-WC-R3-CV
The trial court found the employee had sustained a temporary injury to his back and awarded medical benefits to treat his symptoms. On appeal the employee insists his injury was of a permanent nature. Judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Authoring Judge: Thayer, Sp. J.
Originating Judge:L. Marie Williams, Circuit Judge
Knox County Workers Compensation Panel 08/27/01
State of Tennessee v. Charles R. Blackstock

E2000-01546-CCA-R3-CD

The defendant, Charles R. Blackstock, pled guilty to especially aggravated kidnapping and two counts of rape of a child. See Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 39-13-305, 39-13-522. The trial court imposed 25-year sentences on each offense. The sentences were ordered to be served consecutively, for an effective sentence of 75 years. The sentence for especially aggravated kidnapping and the consecutive sentencing order are affirmed. Because the trial court erroneously applied certain enhancement factors to each of the sentences for rape of a child, the terms are modified to 23 years.

Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Gary R. Wade
Originating Judge:Judge Douglas A. Meyer
Hamilton County Court of Criminal Appeals 08/27/01
Ryder Driver Leasing, Inc. v. Wilson

E2000-00905-WC-R3-CV
The trial court found the plaintiff had a compensable psychiatric injury. We affirm the findings of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: John K. Byers, Sr. J.
Originating Judge:Dale Workman, Circuit Court Judge
Knox County Workers Compensation Panel 08/27/01
State of Tennessee v. George E. Ratliff

E1999-01214-CCA-R3-CD

The defendant, George E. Ratliff, was convicted by a jury of rape of a child. In this consolidated appeal, Defendant alleges various errors by the trial court, challenges his sentence, and appeals the dismissal of his petition for writ of error coram nobis on the ground of untimely filing. After a review of the record and applicable law, we reverse the trial court's summary dismissal of the petition for writ of error coram nobis based on the recent decision of our supreme court in Workman v. State, 41 S.W.3d 100 (Tenn. 2001). We remand this matter to the trial court for a hearing on the merits of the petition for writ of error coram nobis. Pursuant to State v. Mixon, 983 S.W.2d 661 (Tenn. 1999), appellate proceedings on Defendant's appeal as of right from his conviction are stayed, pending the trial court's ruling on the error coram nobis petition.

Authoring Judge: Judge Thomas T. Woodall
Originating Judge:Judge Lynn W. Brown
Washington County Court of Criminal Appeals 08/27/01
Ricky Brown Sr. vs. C.O.I. Majors

W2001-00536-COA-R3-CV
This appeal arises from the dismissal of the Appellant's petition for writ of certiorari seeking review of disciplinary action and the confiscation of property. The Circuit Court of Hardeman County dismissed the Appellant's petition for writ of certiorari for the Appellant's failure to comply with section 41-21-801, et seq. of the Tennessee Code, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, and for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The Appellant appeals the dismissal of his petition for writ of certiorari. For the reasons stated herein, we affirm the trial court's decision.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Alan E. Highers
Originating Judge:Dewey C. Whitenton
Hardeman County Court of Appeals 08/24/01
Charles Shelton v. State of Tennessee

E2000-02805-CCA-R3-PC

The appellant, Charles Shelton, appeals the dismissal of his habeas corpus petition by the Johnson County, Tennessee, Criminal Court. Following a review of the petition and the record herein we find that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED.

Authoring Judge: Judge Jerry Smith
Originating Judge:Judge Lynn W. Brown
Johnson County Court of Criminal Appeals 08/24/01
Elizabeth Hickman vs. Celia Jordan

W2000-03070-COA-R3-CV
This dispute stems from an accident in a restaurant parking lot in which a pedestrian, the plaintiff, was struck by a vehicle driven by the defendant, who was backing-up through the parking lot. The jury in this case found the defendant driver not at fault. We affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge David R. Farmer
Originating Judge:Roger A. Page
Madison County Court of Appeals 08/24/01
Shepard Barbash vs. Monty Bruell & Anthony Smith

E2005-00387-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Originating Judge:Howell N. Peoples
Hamilton County Court of Appeals 08/24/01
Emmett Dunlap vs. Nancy Davis

W2001-00894-COA-R3-CV
Plaintiff-inmate, acting pro se, filed a petition for writ of certiorari to review a judgment of the general sessions court dismissing his case. The trial court denied plaintiff's petition and he appeals. We affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge W. Frank Crawford
Originating Judge:Jon Kerry Blackwood
Hardeman County Court of Appeals 08/24/01
State of Tennessee v. Sheron Lampton

W2000-01583-CCA-CD

The Defendant was convicted of second offense driving under the influence and violation of the open container law. The trial court sentenced her to eleven months, twenty-nine days incarceration for the DUI conviction, suspended after service of ninety days, and to thirty days incarceration, suspended, for violation of the open container law. In this appeal as of right, the Defendant argues that the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to support her convictions. Having reviewed the record, we conclude that sufficient evidence was presented to support the jury’s findings of guilt and therefore affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Authoring Judge: Judge Robert W. Wedemeyer
Originating Judge:Judge Roger A. Page
Madison County Court of Criminal Appeals 08/23/01
State of Tennessee v. Stella Rodifer

E2001-00034-CCA-R3-CD

The defendant, Stella Rodifer, was convicted of forgery, a felony; six counts of worthless checks under $500.00, misdemeanors; and one count of worthless checks over $1,000.00, a felony. The defendant was sentenced to consecutive terms of two and four years, respectively, on each of the felonies. The trial court imposed concurrent sentences of 11 months and 29 days on each misdemeanor, two of which were ordered to be served consecutively for an effective sentence of seven years, 11 months, and 27 days. The trial court granted probation on the misdemeanors and sentenced the defendant to a Community Corrections program on the felonies. Four months later, the trial court revoked the alternative sentences and ordered the defendant to serve four years for forgery; eight years for felony worthless checks; and 11 months and 29 days (two consecutive) for each of the six counts of worthless checks, for an effective sentence of 13 years, 11 months, and 27 days. In this appeal of right, the defendant argues that the trial court erred by revoking her alternative sentences and by imposing lengthier, consecutive sentences. The judgments are affirmed.

Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Gary R Wade
Originating Judge:Judge Robert E. Cupp
Washington County Court of Criminal Appeals 08/23/01
State of Tennessee v. Kelly A. Hancock - Order

M2000-02436-CCA-R3-CD

The appellant, Kelly A. Hancock appeals as a matter of right from her conviction for driving under the influence. She contends the evidence is insufficient to support the jury's verdict of guilt. After a review of the evidence we affirm the conviction pursuant to Rule 20 of the Rules of the Court of Criminal Appeals.

Authoring Judge: Judge Jerry L. Smith
Williamson County Court of Criminal Appeals 08/23/01
State of Tennessee v. Bobby Gene Tucker

E2001-00017-CCA-R3-CD

The defendant, Bobby Gene Tucker, appeals from the revocation of his probation received for his conviction for driving under the influence of an intoxicant (DUI) after having served fifteen days in confinement. He contends (1) that the revocation warrant and affidavit are void, thereby voiding his probation revocation and (2) that the trial court abused its discretion in sentencing him to serve the maximum term of eleven months, twenty-nine days with credit for time served. We affirm the trial court.

Authoring Judge: Judge Joseph M. Tipton
Originating Judge:Judge Lillie Ann Sells
Cumberland County Court of Criminal Appeals 08/23/01
Charles Edward Mitchell v. State of Tennessee

E2001-00373-CCA-R3-PC

The petitioner appeals the denial of post-conviction relief on his second degree murder conviction, arguing that the post-conviction court erred in finding that he had effective assistance of trial counsel. Following his entry of a plea of guilty to second degree murder, the petitioner filed a petition for post-conviction relief, alleging ineffective assistance of counsel. Specifically, he alleged that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to thoroughly investigate and prepare his case, and that were it not for the deficiencies in counsel's representation, he would not have entered his plea of guilty. At the conclusion of an evidentiary hearing, the post-conviction court dismissed the petition, finding that the petitioner had failed to offer any proof to support his allegations. After a careful review, we affirm the judgment of the post-conviction court.

Authoring Judge: Judge Alan E. Glenn
Originating Judge:Judge Ray L. Jenkins
Knox County Court of Criminal Appeals 08/23/01
Charles Hayes v. State of Tennessee

M2000-02360-CCA-R3PC

A Marshall County grand jury indicted the petitioner on two counts of aggravated burglary, two counts of theft, and one count of evading arrest. On October 29, 1997, the petitioner entered an open plea of guilt, reserving the determination of the length and manner of sentencing for the trial court.  Following a sentencing hearing, the trial court sentenced the petitioner to a total of thirty-four years as a Range III persistent offender. In making its sentencing determination, the trial court ran several of the offenses consecutively. On direct appeal, the petitioner challenged his sentence as excessive.  State v. Hayes, No. 01C01-9804-CC-00176, 1999 WL 126650 at *1 (Tenn. Crim. App. at Nashville, March 11, 1999). Finding that the record supported the trial court’s sentence determination, this Court affirmed the trial court’s judgment. Id. at *2. The petitioner then unsuccessfully applied for
permission to appeal the trial court’s sentence determination to the Tennessee Supreme Court.  Thereafter, the petitioner filed a pro se petition for post-conviction relief, alleging that he received ineffective assistance of counsel and that the trial court judge who imposed his sentence should have recused himself due to his personal knowledge of the facts of and victims in the case. The court
appointed counsel for the petitioner, and the petitioner’s newly appointed counsel then filed an amendment to the earlier petition, alleging ineffective assistance of counsel by both trial and appellate counsel. The trial court conducted an evidentiary hearing on the petition and dismissed the petition for post-conviction relief. The petitioner now appeals the trial court’s dismissal of his petition, alleging that he received both ineffective assistance of trial and appellate counsel and that the trial judge erred in denying his motion for recusal. After the reviewing the record and applicable case law, we find these issues to be without merit and therefore affirm the trial court’s denial of the petition for post-conviction relief.

Authoring Judge: Judge Jerry L. Smith
Originating Judge:Judge W. Charles Lee
Marshall County Court of Criminal Appeals 08/23/01
Mattie L. Scales v. City of Oak Ridge, Et Al.

E2000-00499-WCM-CV

Originating Judge:James B. Scott, Jr.
Anderson County Supreme Court 08/23/01