Please enter some keywords to search.
| Dotson vs. Blake, et al
W1998-00710-SC-R11-CV
This is an appeal from the Circuit Court of Weakley County, which refused to permit the jury in a personal injury case to allocate fault to tortfeasors who successfully asserted a statute of repose defense. The Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court. We granted review to decide whether fault may be attributed to tortfeasors who cannot be held liable because of a statute of repose. After examining the record, considering the arguments of the parties, and analyzing the applicable law, we conclude that the courts below erred in not allowing fault to be assigned to the tortfeasors who successfully asserted a statute of repose to the claims against them. Accordingly, for the reasons explained hereafter, the lower courts are reversed.
Authoring Judge: Justice Frank F. Drowota, III
Originating Judge:William B. Acree |
Weakley County | Supreme Court | 05/24/00 | |
| Richard Leemis vs. Paul Russell Jr.
W1999-00352-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge David R. Farmer
Originating Judge:Robert A. Lanier |
Shelby County | Court of Appeals | 05/24/00 | |
| State vs. Norman Pipkin
W1998-02738-CCA-RM-CD
Originating Judge:Jon Kerry Blackwood |
Hardeman County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 05/24/00 | |
| BVT Lebanon Shopping Cehter, Ltd. vs. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., et al
M1997-00059-SC-R11-CV
Authoring Judge: Justice Janice M. Holder
Originating Judge:Bobby H. Capers |
Wilson County | Supreme Court | 05/24/00 | |
| Landstar Poole, Inc. v. George Hugh Rhoades, Jr.
M1999-00040-WC-R3-CV
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance with Tenn. Code Ann. _5-6-225 (e)(3) (1999) for hearing and reporting of findings of fact and conclusions of law. Appellate review of factual issues in workers' compensation cases is de novo with a presumption that the trial court's findings are correct, unless the preponderance of the evidence is otherwise. Tenn. Code Ann. _5-6-225(e)(2) (1999); Hill v. Eagle Bend Mfg., Inc., 942 S.W. 2d 483, 487 (Tenn. 1997). When a trial court has seen and heard witnesses and issues of credibility and weight of testimonyare involved, considerable deference is afforded the trial court's findings of fact. See Humphrey v. David Witherspoon, Inc., 734 S.W. 2d 315, 315-16 (Tenn. 1987). Tenn. R. App. P. 3 Appeal as of Right; Judgment of the Chancery Court Affirmed SAMUEL L. LEWIS, SP. J., in which FRANK F. DROWOTA, III, J., and TOM E. GRAY, SP. J., joined. Kent. E. Krause, Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellant, Landstar Poole, Inc. Alan Wise, Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellee, George Hugh Rhoades, Jr. OPINION This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance with Tenn. Code Ann. _5-6-225 (e)(3) (1999) for hearing and reporting of findings of fact and conclusions of law. Appellate review of factual issues in workers' compensation cases is de novo with a presumption that the trial court's findings are correct, unless the preponderance of the evidence is otherwise. Tenn. Code Ann. _5-6-225(e)(2) (1999); Hill v. Eagle Bend Mfg., Inc., 942 S.W. 2d 483, 487 (Tenn. 1997). When a trial court has -2-
Authoring Judge: Samuel L. Lewis, Sp. J.
|
Davidson County | Workers Compensation Panel | 05/24/00 | |
| State vs. Harris
M1998-00325-SC-R11-CD
We grant permission to appeal as requested by Kenneth Bryan Harris in order to review the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals. The Court of Criminal Appeals found that the trial court had erred in making the following rulings: (1) overruling the State's motion to enter a nolle prosequi on an indictment for aggravated assault; (2) dismissing a superseding indictment for attempted first degree murder and aggravated assault; and (3) reversing the district attorney general pro tempore's rejection of the defendant's application for pretrial diversion on the original indictment. Accordingly, the Court of Criminal Appeals reversed each ruling and remanded the cause to the trial court for further proceedings. After careful consideration, we conclude that the trial court erred in overruling the State's motion for a nolle prosequi on the original indictment. We conclude also that the trial court erred in dismissing the superseding indictment for attempted first degree murder and aggravated assault. Moreover, because the superseding indictment contains a count charging Harris with an offense for which pretrial diversion is not available, we need not consider the question of pretrial diversion. Based on these conclusions, we affirm the decision of the Court of Criminal Appeals and remand the cause to the trial court for proceedings on the superseding indictment.
Authoring Judge: Justice Adolpho A. Birch, Jr.
Originating Judge:Bobby H. Capers |
Wilson County | Supreme Court | 05/24/00 | |
| State vs. Clyde Turner
W1999-00797-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Gary R Wade
Originating Judge:Chris B. Craft |
Shelby County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 05/24/00 | |
| State vs. Patrick Maxwell
E1999-00124-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Alan E. Glenn
Originating Judge:R. Jerry Beck |
Sullivan County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 05/24/00 | |
| BVT Lebanon Shopping Cehter, Ltd. vs. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., et al
M1997-00059-SC-R11-CV
Authoring Judge: Justice Janice M. Holder
Originating Judge:Bobby H. Capers |
Wilson County | Supreme Court | 05/24/00 | |
| State of Tennessee v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Company, et al., v. Gregory Bennett Perry and Steve Lloyd Champion, et al.
M1999-00455-SC-R3-CV
A petition for rehearing has been filed on behalf of the Beckom appellants pursuant to Tennessee Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 39. After consideration of the same, the Court is of the opinion that the petition should be and the same hereby is denied at the cost of the Beckom appellants. Enter this 24th day of May, 2000.
Authoring Judge: Per Curiam
|
Davidson County | Supreme Court | 05/24/00 | |
| State vs. Patrick Maxwell
E1999-00124-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Alan E. Glenn
Originating Judge:R. Jerry Beck |
Sullivan County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 05/24/00 | |
| Linda Liles v. The Yasuda Fire & Marine Insurance
M1999-00016-WC-R3-CV
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance with Tenn. Code Ann. _5-6-225 (e)(3)(1999) for hearing and reporting of findings of fact and conclusions of law. Appellate review of factual issues in workers' compensation cases is de novo with a presumption that the trail court's findings are correct, unless the preponderance of the evidence is otherwise. Tenn. Code Ann. _5-6- 225(e)(2)(1999); Hill v. Eagle Bend Mfg., Inc., 942 S.W. 2d 483, 487 (Tenn. 1997). When a trial court has seen and heard witnesses and issues of credibility and weight of testimony are involved, considerable deference is afforded the trial court's findings of fact. See Humphrey v. David Witherspoon, Inc., 734 S.W. 2d 315, 315-16 (Tenn.1987). Tenn. R. App. P. 3 Appeal as of Right; Judgment of the Chancery Court Affirmed SAMUEL L. LEWIS, SP. J., in which FRANK F. DROWOTA, III, J., and TOM E. GRAY, SP. J., joined. A. Gregory Ramos, Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellant, The Yasuda Fire & Marine Insurance Company of America, Inc. Christina Henley Duncan, Manchester, Tennessee, for the appellee, Linda Liles. OPINION This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance with Tenn. Code Ann. _5-6-225 (e)(3)(1999) for hearing and reporting of findings of fact and conclusions of law. Appellate review of factual issues in workers' compensation cases is de novo with a presumption that the trail court's findings are correct, unless the preponderance of the evidence is otherwise. Tenn. Code Ann. _5-6- -2-
Authoring Judge: Samuel L. Lewis, Sp. J.
|
Franklin County | Workers Compensation Panel | 05/24/00 | |
| Dotson vs. Blake, et al
W1998-00710-SC-R11-CV
This is an appeal from the Circuit Court of Weakley County, which refused to permit the jury in a personal injury case to allocate fault to tortfeasors who successfully asserted a statute of repose defense. The Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court. We granted review to decide whether fault may be attributed to tortfeasors who cannot be held liable because of a statute of repose. After examining the record, considering the arguments of the parties, and analyzing the applicable law, we conclude that the courts below erred in not allowing fault to be assigned to the tortfeasors who successfully asserted a statute of repose to the claims against them. Accordingly, for the reasons explained hereafter, the lower courts are reversed.
Authoring Judge: Justice Frank F. Drowota, III
Originating Judge:William B. Acree |
Weakley County | Supreme Court | 05/24/00 | |
| Harris vs. Chern
M1998-00250-SC-R11-CV
We granted this appeal to determine the standard to be applied in ruling upon a Tenn. R. Civ. P. 54.02 motion to revise a grant of partial summary judgment based upon evidence beyond that which was before the court when the motion was initially granted. For the reasons stated below, we reject the newly discovered evidence rule applied by the trial court and set forth in Bradley v. McLeod, 984 S.W.2d 929 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1998). We adopt a test requiring the trial court to consider, when applicable: 1) the movant's efforts to obtain evidence to respond to the motion for summary judgment; 2) the importance of the newly submitted evidence to the movant's case; 3) the explanation offered by the movant for its failure to offer the newly submitted evidence in its initial response to the motion for summary judgment; 4) the likelihood that the nonmoving party will suffer unfair prejudice; and 5) any other relevant factor. Accordingly, we reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals and remand to the trial court for application of this standard.
Authoring Judge: Justice Janice M. Holder
Originating Judge:Thomas W. Brothers |
Davidson County | Supreme Court | 05/24/00 | |
| State vs. Carl McKissack
W1999-01136-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge David H. Welles
Originating Judge:Roy B. Morgan, Jr. |
Madison County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 05/24/00 | |
| Reece vs. Brown
M1997-00217-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge William C. Koch, Jr.
Originating Judge:Jeffrey F. Stewart |
Marion County | Court of Appeals | 05/23/00 | |
| Ronald E. Walton vs. State
E1999-01165-CCA-R3-PC
After a hearing, the petitioner appeals the criminal court's order dismissing his petition for post-conviction relief. Convicted in 1968 of assault and battery with intent to rape, the petitioner was sentenced to incarceration for ten years. The petitioner has fully served his sentence in Tennessee. However, his Tennessee conviction was used to enhance his 1980 conviction of rape in Indiana. The petitioner proceeds to challenge his Tennessee conviction, in hope of a sentence reduction in Indiana. After careful review, we affirm the criminal court's dismissal.
Authoring Judge: Judge John Everett Williams
Originating Judge:Douglas A. Meyer |
Hamilton County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 05/23/00 | |
| Raymond Cox And Elaine Cox v. Tennessee Farmers Mutual
E2007-00590-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Originating Judge:Billy Joe White |
Campbell County | Court of Appeals | 05/23/00 | |
| State vs. Dimarko Bojere Williams
M1997-00113-SC-R11-CD
Dimarko Bojere Williams was convicted of second degree murder and was sentenced to the Department of Correction for twenty-five years. Williams appealed, contending, inter alia, that the evidence was insufficient to support the conviction for second degree murder because he and the victim had been engaged in "mutual combat" at the time of the killing. In cases in which a victim is killed during mutual combat, he asserted, the defendant may be convicted of voluntary manslaughter only. The Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the conviction for second degree murder but modified Williams's sentence on other grounds. We hold that the evidence is sufficient to support the conviction for second degree murder. In so doing, we reject the defendant's contention that a killing which occurs during mutual combat is, as a matter of law, voluntary manslaughter. The judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals is, therefore, affirmed.
Authoring Judge: Justice Adolpho A. Birch, Jr.
Originating Judge:Jim T. Hamilton |
Maury County | Supreme Court | 05/23/00 | |
| Ginger Taylor Walter vs. James Keener Walter
E1999-00996-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Houston M. Goddard
Originating Judge:Thomas R. Frierson, II |
Greene County | Court of Appeals | 05/23/00 | |
| State vs. Henry
M1995-00005-SC-R11-CD
We granted this appeal to determine whether the trial court erred in admitting statements made by the co-defendant following the arrest of the defendant and the co-defendant for first-degree murder, attempted first-degree murder and related offenses. The Court of Criminal Appeals concluded that although the conspiracy to commit the offenses had ended, the co-defendant's statements were made during the course of and in furtherance of a separate conspiracy to conceal the offenses and were admissible pursuant to the co-conspirator exception to the hearsay rule set out in Tenn. R. Evid. 803(1.2)(E). After reviewing the record, we conclude that the co-defendant's statements were made after the conspiracy had ended and, therefore, were not admissible under Tenn. R. Evid. 803(1.2)(E). We further conclude, however, that the error was harmless, and we affirm the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals.
Authoring Judge: Justice E. Riley Anderson
Originating Judge:Seth W. Norman |
Davidson County | Supreme Court | 05/23/00 | |
| State vs. Henry Daniels
W2002-00193-CCA-R3-CD
The defendant was convicted by a Shelby County Criminal Court jury of aggravated burglary, a Class C felony, and aggravated rape, a Class A felony. He was sentenced by the trial court as a career offender to fifteen years for the aggravated burglary conviction and as a violent offender to forty years for the aggravated rape conviction, with the sentences to be served consecutively, for an effective sentence of fifty-five years in the Department of Correction. On appeal, he raises the sole issue of whether the trial court committed reversible error by denying his request to represent himself at trial. Following our review, we affirm the judgments of the trial court but remand for entry of a corrected judgment as to the aggravated burglary conviction to reflect the defendant's conviction offense which was omitted from the judgment form.
Authoring Judge: Judge Alan E. Glenn
Originating Judge:Joseph B. Dailey |
Shelby County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 05/23/00 | |
| In re: C.W.W., N.W.W., Z.W.W. & A.L.W
M1999-01372-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge David R. Farmer
Originating Judge:Betty Adams Green |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 05/23/00 | |
| McKee vs. McKee
M1997-00204-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge William C. Koch, Jr.
Originating Judge:Jim T. Hamilton |
Maury County | Court of Appeals | 05/23/00 | |
| A.L. Belcher & Assoc. vs. Harrison, et al
M1998-00965-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Patricia J. Cottrell
Originating Judge:Thomas Goodall |
Sumner County | Court of Appeals | 05/23/00 |