Please enter some keywords to search.
| State vs. Joy A. Stinson
E1999-02082-CCA-R3-CD
The defendant was convicted of one count of theft of property over $1,000 for her unauthorized charge of items at a retail store to her former employer's account. The trial court sentenced her to four years imprisonment, with three years suspended. On appeal, the defendant presents the issues of whether the trial court erred in allowing the State to introduce the testimony of an alibi rebuttal witness whom the State did not identify as a witness prior to trial, and in allowing the State to present evidence which she alleges tied her to an uncharged crime. Based upon our review, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Alan E. Glenn
Originating Judge:James B. Scott, Jr. |
Anderson County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 09/29/00 | |
| State vs. Douglas Canady
M1999-02135-CCA-R3-CD
Defendant, Douglas Canady, appeals his conviction for aggravated robbery, for which he received a sentence of ten years in the Department of Correction. The sole issue in this appeal is whether the evidence is sufficient to support the verdict. Finding the evidence sufficient, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Joe G. Riley
Originating Judge:Timothy L. Easter |
Hickman County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 09/29/00 | |
| State vs. Damon Theodore Marsh
M1999-01879-CCA-R3-CD
Defendant, Damon Theodore Marsh, appeals his conviction for second degree murder, for which he received a sentence of 23 years and 6 months. On appeal, the defendant raises the issue of sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction. We conclude that the issue raised by the defendant in this appeal is without merit. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Authoring Judge: Judge Joe G. Riley
Originating Judge:W. Charles Lee |
Bedford County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 09/29/00 | |
| State vs. Richard Allan Frye
E1999-01564-CCA-R9-RL
This appeal arises from the order of the Sullivan County Criminal Court upholding the district attorney general's refusal to accept the application of the defendant for pretrial diversion. The defendant asserts that the trial court erred in failing to determine that the district attorney general abused his discretion by relying on facts not supported by the evidence and by failing to consider all relevant factors. We conclude that substantial evidence was before the district attorney general to support the validity of each of the four factors relied on in denying pretrial diversion and that the district attorney general considered all relevant factors. Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Authoring Judge: Judge Alan E. Glenn
Originating Judge:Phyllis H. Miller |
Sullivan County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 09/29/00 | |
| Tammy Elizabeth Hickman & Danny Ray Hickman vs. Eugenia Darlene Hickman
E2000-00927-COA-R3-CV
Plaintiffs sued to terminate the mother's parental rights. The Trial Judge held plaintiffs failed to carry the burden of proof. We affirm.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Originating Judge:Jeffrey F. Stewart |
Rhea County | Court of Appeals | 09/28/00 | |
| Barry Robinson v. Donald Brooks
M2003-00185-COA-R3-CV
This case involves the sale by auction of certain real property in Davidson County. The buyers brought suit in Davidson County Chancery Court seeking specific performance or, in the alternative, damages for breach of contract. From the trial court's grant of summary judgment for the defendants, the plaintiff buyers appeal. We affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge William B. Cain
Originating Judge:Ellen Hobbs Lyle |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 09/28/00 | |
| State vs. Chris Wilson a/k/a Calvin Clark
M1998-00395-CCA-R3-CD
Following a "best interest" plea to one count of aggravated burglary, the appellant was sentenced to a term of five years in the Department of Correction. On appeal, he challenges (1) the length of the sentence and (2) the imposition of a sentence of total confinement. After review, we affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge David G. Hayes
Originating Judge:John H. Gasaway, III |
Montgomery County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 09/28/00 | |
| Lassiter vs. Lassiter
M1999-00374-COA-R3-CV
This case involves a divorce ending a seven-year marriage. The divorce was awarded to the wife on grounds of the husband's inappropriate marital conduct. The trial court divided the property and debts according to the parties' stipulations. The court then awarded the wife alimony in futuro and ordered the husband to pay $750 of the wife's attorney fees. The husband appeals the awards of alimony and attorney fees. We affirm.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Patricia J. Cottrell
Originating Judge:Carol A. Catalano |
Robertson County | Court of Appeals | 09/28/00 | |
| Dudley vs. Dudley
M1998-00982-COA-R3-CV
In this divorce case, the trial court awarded the divorce to the Wife and divided the property. Husband appeals the award of the marital residence and its contents to Wife. We affirm.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Patricia J. Cottrell
Originating Judge:Carol A. Catalano |
Montgomery County | Court of Appeals | 09/28/00 | |
| Moss vs. TN Board of Paroles
M2000-00128-COA-R3-CV
At the hearing where appellant's parole was revoked, the Hearing Officer admitted sworn statements of alleged victims. The Trial Court upheld the revocation. We affirm.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Originating Judge:Ellen Hobbs Lyle |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 09/28/00 | |
| Wilson vs. So. Centr. Corr. Facility Disciplinary Bd
M2000-00303-COA-RM-CV
An inmate in a privately operated prison filed a Petition for Writ of Certiorari against the disciplinary board at that facility. The trial court dismissed his petition for failure to state a claim. We affirm
Authoring Judge: Judge Ben H. Cantrell
Originating Judge:Jim T. Hamilton |
Wayne County | Court of Appeals | 09/28/00 | |
| Joiner vs. Metro Gov't
M2000-00413-COA-R3-CV
The Trial Court entered consent Judgment over objection of defendant. We vacate Judgment and remand.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Originating Judge:Carol L. Soloman |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 09/28/00 | |
| Paul Farnsworth, A/K/A Ronnie Bradfield v. Donita Moore,
01623-COA-R3-CV
Originating Judge:Thomas W. Graham |
Bledsoe County | Court of Appeals | 09/28/00 | |
| Turner vs. Turner
M1999-00482-COA-R3-CV
This is a divorce case. Following a bench trial, the court below (1) granted a divorce to wife; (2) divided the marital property; (3) awarded wife alimony in the form of a $1,640.55 monthly payment out of husband's retirement account; and (4) declared that the alimony award was to be secured by the husband's retirement account. Husband appeals the alimony award, the use of the retirement account as security for the payment of alimony, and the trial court's division of the marital property. Wife takes issue with the division of the parties' marital property. We affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge Charles D. Susano, Jr.
Originating Judge:Marietta M. Shipley |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 09/28/00 | |
| Turner vs. Turner
M1999-00482-COA-R3-CV
This is a divorce case. Following a bench trial, the court below (1) granted a divorce to wife; (2) divided the marital property; (3) awarded wife alimony in the form of a $1,640.55 monthly payment out of husband's retirement account; and (4) declared that the alimony award was to be secured by the husband's retirement account. Husband appeals the alimony award, the use of the retirement account as security for the payment of alimony, and the trial court's division of the marital property. Wife takes issue with the division of the parties' marital property. We affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge Charles D. Susano, Jr.
Originating Judge:Marietta M. Shipley |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 09/28/00 | |
| State Dept. of Children's Svcs. vs. L.S., In the Matter of D.S.
M1999-00847-COA-R3-CV
The Trial Court removed minor child from the parental home on grounds child was dependent and neglected. We affirm.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Originating Judge:John J. Maddux |
Pickett County | Court of Appeals | 09/28/00 | |
| Franklin Nat'l Bank vs. Prowell
M2000-00580-COA-R3-CV
The Circuit Court of Williamson County refused to issue a writ of certiorari to review a judgment of the General Sessions Court of that county because the petition was untimely and the same issues were already pending in an action in Maury County. We affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge Ben H. Cantrell
Originating Judge:Jeffrey S. Bivins |
Williamson County | Court of Appeals | 09/28/00 | |
| State vs. Bernard K. Johnson
E2000-00009-CCA-R3-CD
The defendant appeals to challenge the sufficiency of the evidence supporting his convictions of sexual battery and aggravated kidnapping and the propriety of the felony sentences imposed by the trial court. We affirm the convictions, but upon notice of plain error, we reverse a misdemeanor conviction of aggravated criminal trespass. Finding the misapplication of some enhancement factors, we modify some of the sentences.
Authoring Judge: Judge J. Curwood Witt, Jr.
Originating Judge:Ray L. Jenkins |
Knox County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 09/27/00 | |
| Michael Bailey vs. State
E2000-00432-CCA-R3-PC
A Sullivan County jury convicted the petitioner of one count of second degree murder involving the death of his son. For this offense the petitioner received a sentence of twenty years as a Range I, standard offender, and a $50,000 fine. He unsuccessfully brought a direct appeal challenging both his conviction and sentence. Subsequently, he filed a pro se post-conviction petition and was appointed counsel from the public defender's office. Following an evidentiary hearing, the trial court took this matter under advisement and later issued a detailed order dismissing the petition. Thereafter, the petitioner requested that his appointed attorney withdraw from the case and that he be allowed to bring his appeal pro se. The trial court granted this motion, and the petitioner now brings this appeal raising three issues. More specifically, he asserts that (1) the jury instructions, when viewed overall, effectively denied him "a fair trial and a reliable verdict;" (2) the State engaged in misconduct and denied him a fair trial by withholding exculpatory material; and (3) the prosecuting officer made the result of the petitioner's trial unreliable because the officer perjured himself. After reviewing these issues, we find that all have been waived and/or lack merit. We, therefore, affirm the trial court's denial of post-conviction relief.
Authoring Judge: Judge Jerry Smith
Originating Judge:R. Jerry Beck |
Sullivan County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 09/27/00 | |
| Michael E. Christian vs. State
E2000-00922-CCA-R3-PC
The petitioner, Michael E. Christian, appeals the trial court's denial of his petition for post-conviction relief. He contends that he did not voluntarily enter his guilty pleas because he was experiencing panic attacks and confusion, which was a side effect of his medication, at the time he entered the pleas. He also claims that he received the ineffective assistance of counsel because his attorneys did not investigate the effects of his medication on his competency and scared him into pleading guilty. We affirm the trial court's denial of the petition.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Joseph M. Tipton
Originating Judge:R. Jerry Beck |
Sullivan County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 09/27/00 | |
| Jimmy B. Hillard, et al vs. Buddie Ruth Franklin
E2000-00402-COA-R3-CV
This is a suit for specific performance. The plaintiffs entered into an agreement with the defendant to purchase certain real property for $80,000. Before the purchase was closed, a house on the property was destroyed by fire, and the defendant collected $35,000 as proceeds from her homeowners' insurance policy. The purchase of the property did not proceed to closing and the plaintiffs filed suit for specific performance of the contract at a purchase price of $45,000 -- this amount being the difference between the original purchase price and the insurance proceeds collected by the defendant. The trial court granted the plaintiffs summary judgment. The defendant appeals, contending that this case is not ripe for summary judgment. We affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge Charles D. Susano, Jr.
Originating Judge:Richard R. Vance |
Jefferson County | Court of Appeals | 09/27/00 | |
| State vs. Tracy L. Fry
E1999-02758-CCA-R3-CD
Tracy Fry, the Defendant and Appellant, pled guilty to driving under the influence, second offense. With the State's and trial court's agreement, however, she specifically reserved the right to appeal a dispositive question of law pursuant to Tenn. R. Crim. P. 37(b)(2)(1). The issue reserved for review is whether Officer Kyte "had reasonable suspicion based on specific and articulable facts, to approach and subsequently seize the defendant leading to the arrest of the defendant." We conclude that the initial encounter between Officer Kyte and the Defendant was not a seizure, that the encounter provided reasonable suspicion sufficient to justify an investigatory detention of the Defendant, and that sufficient probable cause to arrest the Defendant developed during the course of the brief investigatory detention. Thus, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Authoring Judge: Judge Jerry Smith
Originating Judge:Lynn W. Brown |
Washington County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 09/27/00 | |
| Walter E. Everette, et al vs. Hubert G. Berry, et al
E2000-00461-COA-R3-CV
In this dispute over real estate, the Plaintiffs seek to have a quit claim deed conveying certain property to the Defendants declared spurious, as well as injunctive relief relative to rights-of-way adjacent to their property. The Chancellor granted the relief the Plaintiffs sought, resulting in this appeal. We affirm.
Originating Judge:Daryl R. Fansler |
Knox County | Court of Appeals | 09/27/00 | |
| State vs. Bobby Wells
E2000-01496-CCA-R3-CD
A Monroe County jury convicted the defendant of the sale of .5 grams or more of cocaine and of a separate offense involving the sale of less than .5 grams of cocaine. For these crimes the trial court sentenced him to nine years and four years respectively as a Range I, standard offender. These sentences were ordered to run concurrently with one another. Furthermore, the jury assessed the defendant a fifteen thousand dollar fine on each conviction. At a subsequent hearing the trial court denied his new trial motion and revoked his probation from previous offenses. Appealing these decisions, the defendant raises the following six issues: 1) whether the trial court erred by permitting the State to introduce transcripts of taped conversations allegedly transpiring between the defendant and informant when such transcripts were admitted through a police officer who neither heard nor electronically monitored the involved conversations; 2) whether the trial court erred by permitting the prosecution to play and introduce the aforementioned tapes through the same officer; 3) whether the State failed to prove chain of custody because it neither called the lab technician who placed the evidence in the vault at the crime laboratory nor complied with Tennessee Rule of Evidence 803(6); 4) whether the trial court erred in refusing to grant the defendant a new trial based on newly discovered evidence involving the informant's motive for testifying against the defendant; 5) whether sufficient evidence existed to support the conviction; and 6) whether the defendant's probation revocation should stand when such was based upon the above-outlined new convictions and not the defendant's failure to report as was alleged in the probation violation warrant and when the convictions forming the basis for the revocation are allegedly not supported by sufficient evidence. After a review of the record, we find these claims to lack merit and, therefore, affirm the lower court's actions.
Authoring Judge: Judge Jerry Smith
Originating Judge:R. Steven Bebb |
Monroe County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 09/27/00 | |
| State vs. James E. Harman, Jr.
E2000-00437-CCA-R3-CD
In October of 1999, the defendant pled guilty to one count of theft over one-thousand dollars ($1,000.00) and one count of possession of less than .5 ounces of marijuana. His plea form indicated that he agreed to receive concurrent sentences of five and one-half years as a Range II, multiple offender for the former offense and eleven months and twenty-nine days for the latter. Subsequently, the trial court conducted a hearing to determine the manner in which these sentences were to be served. At the conclusion of such hearing, the trial court denied the defendant any form of alternative sentencing, and it is this denial that the defendant contests through his appeal. However, after having reviewed the record and applicable authorities, we find this contention to be without merit and, therefore, affirm the trial court's sentence.
Authoring Judge: Judge Jerry Smith
Originating Judge:R. Jerry Beck |
Sullivan County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 09/27/00 |