Please enter some keywords to search.
| International Deli/Caterers vs. Raymond/Kimberly Shields
W2000-00269-COA-R3-CV
This is a contract case. The defendants entered into a franchise agreement with the plaintiff to own and operate a franchise. After the defendants failed to make royalty payments for two months and then failed to make a note payment, the plaintiff filed suit alleging breach of contract. The defendants counter-claimed, alleging that the plaintiff breached the contract first by not operating a marketing fund mentioned in the franchise agreement and by not furnishing a sign provided for in the purchase agreement. At trial, the trial court allowed testimony by the plaintiff as to discussions, prior and subsequent to the signing of the agreements, in which he claimed that the parties had agreed upon different terms regarding the marketing fund and sign. The trial court found that the plaintiff had not breached the agreements by not maintaining the marketing fund or furnishing the sign, and that even if it were a breach, it was not a material breach. The defendants now appeal. We affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge Holly M. Kirby
Originating Judge:James F. Russell |
Shelby County | Court of Appeals | 09/21/00 | |
| State vs. Hooper
M1997-00031-SC-R11-CD
The single issue in this appeal is whether the proof introduced at the sentencing hearing is sufficient to support a denial of probation based solely upon the need for deterrence. The Court of Criminal Appeals initially affirmed the sentence and held that proof of deterrence was not needed because drug use and possession cases are "deterrable per se." Upon the defendant's petition to rehear, however, the intermediate court reversed itself, holding that a "per se" rule of deterrence is inconsistent with the holding of this Court in State vs. Ashby, 823 S.W.2d 166 (Tenn. 1991). The State appealed to this Court. For the reasons given herein, we hold that the proof in this case is sufficient to justify denial of probation on the sole ground of deterrence. The judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals granting an alternative sentence is reversed, and the defendant's original term of incarceration is reinstated.
Authoring Judge: Justice William M. Barker
Originating Judge:Allen W. Wallace |
Humphreys County | Supreme Court | 09/21/00 | |
| State vs. Billy Hancock
W1999-01746-CCA-R3-CD
The defendant, Billy Hancock, pled guilty in Shelby County Criminal Court to vehicular homicide, vehicular assault, aggravated child endangerment, three (3) counts of child endangerment, and reckless driving. The trial court sentenced the defendant to serve twelve (12) years for vehicular homicide, four (4) years for vehicular assault, four (4) years for aggravated child endangerment, nine (9) months for each of the three (3) counts of child endangerment, and six (6) months for reckless driving. The court ordered that the sentences for vehicular homicide, vehicular assault, and each of the three counts of child endangerment were to be served consecutively to each other, and that the sentences for reckless driving and aggravated child endangerment were to be served concurrently with the sentence for vehicular homicide. The total effective sentence was eighteen (18) years and three (3) months. On appeal, this court affirms the imposition of consecutive sentences because the trial court properly found that the defendant was a dangerous offender and had an extensive criminal history.
Authoring Judge: Judge Jerry Smith
Originating Judge:Chris B. Craft |
Shelby County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 09/21/00 | |
| State of Tennessee v. Demetrius Levar Mcneil
W2000-00276-CCA-R3-CD
Originating Judge:Chris B. Craft |
Shelby County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 09/21/00 | |
| Betty L. Fox vs. Food Lion, Inc., Store #539
E1911-00015-COA-R3-CV
Betty L. Fox sued Food Lion, Inc., Store #539, seeking damages for personal injuries sustained when she fell in an aisle of the defendant's store. The trial court approved the jury's verdict for the plaintiff and entered judgment in her favor for $112,000. The defendant appeals, raising three issues, which we restate as follows: (1) whether there is material evidence that the defendant had actual or constructive notice of the allegedly dangerous condition that caused the plaintiff's fall; (2) whether the defendant owed a duty of care to the plaintiff; and (3) whether there is material evidence to support the jury's allocation of fault. We affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge Charles D. Susano, Jr.
Originating Judge:Harold Wimberly |
Knox County | Court of Appeals | 09/21/00 | |
| Jerry Wayne Killion vs. Sandra Faye Sweat
E1999-02634-COA-R3-CV
In this post-divorce proceeding, the father of Dustin Lynn Killion filed a petition seeking the child's custody. The trial court denied the father's petition. The father appeals the trial court's determination that the proof fails to demonstrate a material change of circumstances warranting a change of custody. We reverse.
Authoring Judge: Judge Charles D. Susano, Jr.
Originating Judge:Robert M. Summitt |
Campbell County | Court of Appeals | 09/21/00 | |
| Brenda D. Estes, et al vs. Sandra H. Peels, et al
E1999-00582-COA-R3-CV
This case arises out of a motor vehicle accident that occurred when a vehicle exited a manufacturing plant's parking lot and collided with the plaintiff's vehicle on a public highway. Brenda D. Estes and her husband sued the owner of the plant for negligence. The trial court granted the plant owner summary judgment. We hold that, under the circumstances of this case, the plant owner did not owe a duty of care to the plaintiff and therefore affirm the grant of summary judgment.
Authoring Judge: Judge Charles D. Susano, Jr.
Originating Judge:Ben W. Hooper, II |
Jefferson County | Court of Appeals | 09/21/00 | |
| Mary Schremp vs. David Schremp
W1999-01734-COA-R3-CV
Mother, the custodial parent of minor children, desired to relocate out of state to live with her new husband. Father protested the move and filed a petition in opposition. Finding that Mother's new husband could easily move to Memphis to live with his new family and that dislocating the children was not in their best interest, the trial court granted the petition. We affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge David R. Farmer
Originating Judge:John R. Mccarroll, Jr. |
Shelby County | Court of Appeals | 09/21/00 | |
| State vs. Deborah Clark
W1999-00893-CCA-R3-CD
The defendant, Deborah Darlene Clark, was convicted by a Madison County jury of aggravated kidnapping, aggravated robbery, and criminal impersonation. In this appeal the defendant claims the evidence is insufficient to support the verdicts. The court finds the evidence clearly sufficient to support the convictions and thus affirms the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Jerry Smith
Originating Judge:Roger A. Page |
Madison County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 09/21/00 | |
| Stephenson vs. Carlton
E1998-00202-SC-R11-CD
We granted this appeal to determine whether the appellant's sentence of life without parole for first- degree murder was an illegal sentence and, if so, whether the appellant was entitled to habeas corpus relief. The trial court dismissed the petition for habeas corpus and the Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed. We conclude, and the State concedes, that the sentence of life without parole was not a statutorily authorized punishment at the time the appellant committed the offense of first-degree murder and that the illegal sentence was properly challenged in a habeas corpus petition. We reverse the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals and remand the case to the trial court for further proceedings.
Authoring Judge: Justice E. Riley Anderson
Originating Judge:Lynn W. Brown |
Johnson County | Supreme Court | 09/21/00 | |
| State of Tennessee v. Jerry Wayne Southerland
W1999-01083-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Robert W. Wedemeyer
Originating Judge:William B. Acree |
Obion County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 09/21/00 | |
| Marvin Catron v. State of Tennessee
W2007-02408-CCA-R3-PC
Authoring Judge: Judge Alan E. Glenn
Originating Judge:John T. Fowlkes, Jr. |
Shelby County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 09/21/00 | |
| State vs. Eric Young
W2000-00057-CCA-R3-PC
In this appeal from the trial court's denial of his post-conviction petition, the petitioner argues that he received ineffective assistance of counsel and that his guilty plea was unknowing and involuntarily entered. We find no error in the trial court's denial of the post-conviction petition.
Authoring Judge: Judge John Everett Williams
Originating Judge:Roy B. Morgan, Jr. |
Madison County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 09/21/00 | |
| Eric Petty, a child
W2000-00907-COA-R3-CV
This case involves an appeal regarding the lower court's determination that Eric Dylan Petty was a delinquent child. In February 2000, a petition was filed with the Juvenile Court of Obion County alleging that Eric Dylan Petty committed the delinquent acts of aggravated assault and vandalism. The juvenile court determined that Petty was delinquent and ordered him committed to the Tennessee Department of Children's Services. After a de novo hearing, the circuit court also declared Petty delinquent based on the acts of aggravated assault and vandalism and affirmed Petty's commitment to the Department of Children's Services. This appeal followed.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Alan E. Highers
Originating Judge:William B. Acree |
Obion County | Court of Appeals | 09/21/00 | |
| Wilson Pharmacy, Inc., vs. General Computer Corp.
E2000-00733-COA-R3-CV
The origin of this appeal is a complaint filed by Plaintiff Wilson Pharmacy, Inc., against Defendant General Computer Corporation, seeking damages for allegedly furnishing defective computer hardware and software programs pursuant to contracts entered into between the parties. The Trial Court found that the provision providing suit must be brought within one year after accrual of the action barred Wilson Pharmacy's claim. Wilson Pharmacy appeals, contending the contract they entered into was one of adhesion, rendering the contract limitation period ineffective. We affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge Houston M. Goddard
Originating Judge:Thomas J. Seeley, Jr. |
Washington County | Court of Appeals | 09/21/00 | |
| Jerry Wayne Terry vs. Donna Brazier Terry
E2000-00825-COA-R3-CV
This appeal from the Cumberland County Probate and Family Court concerns whether the Trial Court erred in making an equitable division of the marital estate of Jerry Wayne Terry, the Appellant, and Donna Brazier Terry, the Appellee. We affirm the judgment of the Trial Court and remand for such further proceedings as may be necessary. We adjudge costs of appeal against Mr. Terry and his surety.
Authoring Judge: Judge Houston M. Goddard
Originating Judge:Steven C. Douglas |
Cumberland County | Court of Appeals | 09/20/00 | |
| State vs. Anthony Roberts
M1999-00750-CCA-R3-CD
Defendant appeals his conviction by a Davidson County jury of DUI second offense. He raises the following issues for our review: (1) whether the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress based upon the lack of probable cause to arrest; (2) whether the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction; (3) whether the prosecutor committed misconduct during final argument, and (4) whether records pertaining to his prior DUI conviction were properly admitted. Finding no error, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Joe G. Riley
Originating Judge:Frank G. Clement, Jr. |
Davidson County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 09/20/00 | |
| Anthony Ewing vs. State
M1999-01079-CCA-R3-PC
On February 12, 1998, the petitioner, Anthony Ewing, entered a best interest guilty plea in the Davidson County Criminal Court to one count of attempt to sell over .5 grams of cocaine, a class C felony. The trial court imposed a sentence of six years incarceration in the Davidson County Workhouse. The trial court further ordered this sentence to be served concurrently with sentences the petitioner was already serving. The petitioner filed a post-conviction petition for relief, alleging that he received ineffective assistance of counsel and that his best interest guilty plea was not made knowingly or voluntarily. The post-conviction court denied the petition, finding that the petitioner had received effective assistance of counsel and that the best interest guilty plea had been made knowingly and voluntarily. The petitioner now appeals the denial of his petition for post-conviction relief. Pursuant to a review of the record and the parties' briefs, we affirm the judgment of the post-conviction court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Norma McGee Ogle
Originating Judge:Steve R. Dozier |
Davidson County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 09/20/00 | |
| E1999-01909-R3-CV
E1999-01909-R3-CV
Originating Judge:James B. Scott, Jr. |
Anderson County | Court of Appeals | 09/20/00 | |
| Scott Yother vs. Laine Yother
E2000-01046-COA-R3-CV
In this post-divorce case, Elaine Hines Yother ("Mother") appeals from an order awarding primary residential custody of the parties' minor child, Avery Raechelle Yother (DOB: April 2, 1995), to the child's father, Scott Christopher Yother ("Father"). Mother argues (1) that the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to modify the custodial arrangement decreed in the parties' divorce judgment; and, alternatively, (2) that the evidence preponderates against the trial court's judgment changing custody. Because we find that the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to address the issue of custody, we reverse the judgment below.
Authoring Judge: Judge Charles D. Susano, Jr.
Originating Judge:Jacqueline E. Schulten |
Hamilton County | Court of Appeals | 09/20/00 | |
| State vs. Kenneth Sisco
M2000-00036-CCA-R3-CD
The Defendant pleaded guilty to the offense of robbery. His plea agreement provided that he would be sentenced as a Range II multiple offender, with the length of the sentence to be determined by the trial judge. Following a sentencing hearing, the judge sentenced him to ten years in the Department of Correction. On appeal, the Defendant argues that the trial judge erred by setting his sentence at ten years. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge David H. Welles
Originating Judge:Steve R. Dozier |
Davidson County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 09/20/00 | |
| State vs. ThomasLawrence and Joseph Hatton
M2000-00493-CCA-R3-CD
The appellant, Thomas Lawrence, was convicted by a jury in the Marshall County Criminal Court of one count of possession of cocaine with intent to sell, a class C felony, and one count of possession of drug paraphernalia, a class A misdemeanor. The trial court sentenced Lawrence, as a Range II offender, to eight years incarceration in the Tennessee Department of Correction for the possession of crack cocaine conviction and assessed a $2000 fine. The trial court further sentenced Lawrence to eleven months incarceration in the Marshall County Jail for the possession of drug paraphernalia conviction. The trial court ordered Lawrence to serve these sentences concurrently. The appellant, Joseph Hatton, was convicted by a jury in the Marshall County Criminal Court of two counts of selling crack cocaine, a class C felony, one count of possession of crack cocaine with the intent to sell, a class C felony, and one count of possession of drug paraphernalia, a class A misdemeanor. The trial court sentenced Hatton, as a Range I offender, to four years incarceration in the Tennessee Department of Correction for each sale of crack cocaine conviction and four years incarceration for the possession of crack cocaine with the intent to sell conviction. The court assessed a total of $4250 in fines. The trial court further ordered Hatton to serve his sentences for selling crack cocaine concurrently with each other but consecutive to the sentence for possession of crack cocaine with the intent to sell.
Authoring Judge: Judge Norma McGee Ogle
Originating Judge:W. Charles Lee |
Marshall County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 09/20/00 | |
| State of Tennessee v. Michael Brady
II-798-239-A
Originating Judge:Timothy L. Easter |
Williamson County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 09/20/00 | |
| Cunningham vs. Cunningham
W1999-02054-COA-R3-CV
This appeal involves a divorce after seven years of marriage. The trial court granted the wife a divorce, divided the property, awarded the wife rehabilitative alimony and alimony in solido, awarded child support for the parties' minor child, established an educational trust fund, and ordered the husband to maintain life insurance for so long as he is obligated to pay child support. On appeal, husband takes issue with all of the above and also raises the constitutionality of the child support guidelines. In addition, wife takes issue with the failure of the trial court to award her litigation expenses. We have determined that the trial court's judgment should be affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded.
Authoring Judge: Judge David R. Farmer
Originating Judge:Joe C. Morris |
Madison County | Court of Appeals | 09/20/00 | |
| The Pointe vs. Lake Mgmt.
W2000-00211-COA-R3-CV
This appeal arises from a declaratory judgment action to determine rights in a privately-owned lake. Plaintiffs purchased land adjacent to the artificially-created lake for the purpose of developing residential lots. Subsequent to the sale of the property, Plaintiffs' grantor conveyed title to the lake to Defendant. Defendant claims it has the right to control use of the lake and that Plaintiffs have no right to lake access without Defendant's permission. The trial court granted Defendant's motion for summary judgment on the grounds that: (1) the lake is unnavigable, and no riparian rights can therefore flow to adjoining landowners; (2) the Defendant, as owner of the land subjacent to the lake, has a right to the unimpeded use and control of the property; and (3) any use of the lake by the adjoining property owners without Defendant's consent would constitute a trespass. Plaintiffs appeal.
Authoring Judge: Judge W. Frank Crawford
Originating Judge:Walter L. Evans |
Shelby County | Court of Appeals | 09/20/00 |