APPELLATE COURT OPINIONS

Please enter some keywords to search.
Bowman vs. Midstate Finance Co.

01A01-9808-CH-00424

Originating Judge:W. Charles Lee
Bedford County Court of Appeals 04/16/99
Cochran vs. Lowe

03A01-9809-CV-00292
Court of Appeals 04/16/99
Vanderbilt University vs. Pamela Henderson

M1998-00929-COA-R3-CV
This appeal involves a dispute between Vanderbilt University and one of its graduates arising out of two student loans. After the former student stopped repaying the loans, Vanderbilt University filed suit in the Davidson County General Sessions Court seeking to recover the principal and interest due, collection costs, and attorney's fees. The general sessions court awarded Vanderbilt University a $9,056.43 judgment. The former student perfected a de novo appeal to the Circuit Court for Davidson County. Following a bench trial, the trial court awarded Vanderbilt University a $5,051.56 judgment and established an installment payment plan for the judgment. The former student asserts on this appeal that Vanderbilt University was not entitled to a judgment against her because of its failure to comply with the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and the requirements of the federal student loan program and because she has fully repaid her loans. We have concluded that the record supports the trial court's decision and, therefore, affirm the judgment.
Authoring Judge: Judge William C. Koch, Jr.
Originating Judge:Thomas W. Brothers
Davidson County Court of Appeals 04/16/99
Stuart Bowden vs. Memphis Bd. Ed.

02A01-9807-CH-00217

Originating Judge:C. Neal Small
Shelby County Court of Appeals 04/16/99
Carlos L. Acevedo vs. State

01C01-9711-CR-00541
Davidson County Court of Criminal Appeals 04/16/99
B.C.I. vs. City of Memphis

02A01-9709-CH-00238

Originating Judge:C. Neal Small
Shelby County Court of Appeals 04/16/99
Dan Wilson v. Lawrence Rubin

M1998-00959-COA-R3-CV
This appeal involves the termination of an employee by a music publishing company after one of its songwriters complained that the employee had stalked and harassed her. The employee filed suit in the Chancery Court for Davidson County alleging gender and age discrimination in violation of the Tennessee Human Rights Act. The publishing company moved for a summary judgment asserting that it had a valid non-discriminatory ground for terminating the employee. The employee responded that the proffered non-discriminatory ground was pretextual. The trial court granted the summary judgment and dismissed the employee's complaint. On this appeal, the employee asserts that genuine material factual disputes regarding the publishing company's non-discriminatory reasons for terminating him should have prevented the trial court from granting the summary judgment. We agree and, therefore, vacate the order dismissing the employee's complaint.
Authoring Judge: Judge William C. Koch, Jr.
Originating Judge:Irvin H. Kilcrease, Jr.
Davidson County Court of Appeals 04/16/99
City of Cleveland vs. Bradley County .

03A01-9804-CV-00140
Bradley County Court of Appeals 04/16/99
Kennedy vs. Holder et al

01A01-9805-CV-00242

Originating Judge:Buddy D. Perry
Franklin County Court of Appeals 04/16/99
Coleman vs. Coleman

03A01-9810-CV-00329
Cumberland County Court of Appeals 04/16/99
O3A01-9810-CV-00355

O3A01-9810-CV-00355
Jefferson County Court of Appeals 04/16/99
State vs. Edward L. Samuels

01C01-9803-CR-00145
Davidson County Court of Criminal Appeals 04/16/99
State vs. Lon Walker

01C01-9711-CR-00535

Originating Judge:Leon C. Burns, Jr.
Putnam County Court of Criminal Appeals 04/16/99
Morgan vs. Driskill

03A01-9802-CV-00079
Jefferson County Court of Appeals 04/16/99
Julia Leach Bryan vs. James Leach

M1998-00922-COA-R3-CV
This case involves post-divorce disputes over alimony and child support and issues of contempt of court. The father commenced this appeal after the trial court declined to modify or terminate his alimony obligation and awarded the mother more than $50,000 in child support arrearages and, later, found the father in contempt of court and ordered him to pay a fine of $100 per day until all judgments were paid to the mother. On appeal, the father argues that his alimony obligation should have terminated or decreased, that a portion of his child support payments should be placed in trust for the benefit of the children, and that the trial court erred by fining him for contempt. We affirm the trial court's orders but modify the fine imposed upon the father.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Patricia J. Cottrell
Originating Judge:Jim T. Hamilton
Maury County Court of Appeals 04/15/99
Patricia Anne Pehlman v. Gregory Lawrence Pehlman and Sobieski and Associates

3A01-9809-CV-00311

In this action Patricia Anne Pehlman essentially seeks a declaration that marital property awarded to her in a divorce is not subject to a lien in favor of the intervenor.

 

Authoring Judge: Judge Herschel Pickens Franks
Originating Judge:Judge Bill Swann
Knox County Court of Appeals 04/15/99
State vs. Antonio Ward

02C01-9808-CC-00233

Originating Judge:Whit A. Lafon
Madison County Court of Criminal Appeals 04/15/99
McNair vs. Smith

03A01-9804-CH-00122
Court of Appeals 04/15/99
McKinley vs. Holt

03A01-9807-PB-00220
Court of Appeals 04/15/99
Street vs. Waddell

03A01-9710-CV-00488
Washington County Court of Appeals 04/15/99
Billy Steagall vs. Nancy Steagall

M1998-00948-COA-R3-CV
This appeal involves a post-divorce dispute regarding the custody a 15-year-old boy. In August 1997, the boy's father petitioned the Chancery Court for Marshall County to change the minor's custody because of his concern that the mother's attempt to home school the boy had undermined his education and development of social skills. The mother opposed the petition and requested an increase in child support. During the June 1998 trial, the father presented evidence raising serious questions about the progress of the child's education and development of social skills, as well as other aspects of the mother's approach to parenting. The mother presented no evidence of her own. Instead, after the close of the father's proof, she asserted that the trial court could remediate the acknowledged deficiencies without changing custody. Thereafter, the parties and the court discussed at length the provisions of a proposed remedial order, and the hearing was adjourned when the parties and the court believed they had agreed on the contents of the proposed order. Before the trial court entered the proposed order, the wife took issue with a provision requiring her to enroll the child in public school. The trial court informed the parties that it had understood that both parties had agreed to send their child to public school and that it would resume the trial if its understanding was incorrect. Rather than requesting the trial court to resume the hearing, the mother filed this appeal claiming that the trial court had infringed on her constitutionally protected right to raise her child. We have determined, in accordance with Tenn. R. App. P. 36(a), that the mother is not entitled to appellate relief because she is, in part, responsible for the error and because she failed to pursue the reasonably available steps that would have nullified the harmful effect of the error. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment.
Authoring Judge: Judge William C. Koch, Jr.
Originating Judge:Lee Russell
Marshall County Court of Appeals 04/15/99
Norris vs. Gounaris

03A01-9807-CH-00238
Court of Appeals 04/15/99
State vs. Michael Elvis Green

W2001-00455-CCA-R3-CD
A Hardeman County jury found the defendant guilty of rape. Four issues are raised on appeal: (1) whether there was sufficient evidence to support the conviction; (2) whether the trial court erred in denying the defendant a continuance; (3) whether evidence of the defendant's escape from jail was improperly admitted; and (4) whether the trial court should have charged the jury as to sexual battery, statutory rape, and Class B misdemeanor assault as lesser-included offenses of rape. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Joe G. Riley
Originating Judge:Jon Kerry Blackwood
Hardeman County Court of Criminal Appeals 04/15/99
O'Bryant vs. Reeder Chevrolet

03A01-9810-CV-00325
Court of Appeals 04/15/99
State vs. Donald Tallie

02C01-9807-CC-00229

Originating Judge:C. Creed Mcginley
Carroll County Court of Criminal Appeals 04/15/99