Please enter some keywords to search.
| Janet Arwood Sartain, et al vs. John Ross Sartain
E1999-00556-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge David Michael Swiney
Originating Judge:T. E. Fogerty |
Jefferson County | Court of Appeals | 10/29/98 | |
| State vs. Blake Hallum & Richard Halfacre
01C01-9703-CR-00083
Originating Judge:J. Randall Wyatt, Jr. |
Davidson County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 10/29/98 | |
| Michael Bass vs. Jack Morgan, Warden
01C01-9802-CC-00066
Originating Judge:Donald P. Harris |
Hickman County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 10/29/98 | |
| State vs. Allan Brooks
01C01-9510-CC-00324
Originating Judge:Walter C. Kurtz |
Davidson County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 10/29/98 | |
| State vs. Katherine Warren
01C01-9710-CC-00455
|
Bedford County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 10/28/98 | |
| Margaret Barnes vs. Bright Glade Home
02A01-9801-CV-00011
Originating Judge:Kay S. Robilio |
Shelby County | Court of Appeals | 10/28/98 | |
| Lance vs. Lance
01A01-9801-CV-00036
Originating Judge:Thomas Goodall |
Sumner County | Court of Appeals | 10/28/98 | |
| State vs. Steve Houston
01C01-9711-CC-00510
Originating Judge:Robert L. Jones |
Giles County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 10/28/98 | |
| Becky Sanders vs. George Gray/John Curtis
02A01-9710-CV-00268
Originating Judge:Joseph H. Walker, III |
Tipton County | Court of Appeals | 10/28/98 | |
| Gary Green vs. State
01C01-9709-CR-00393
Originating Judge:Thomas H. Shriver |
Davidson County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 10/28/98 | |
| State vs. William Brewer
02C01-9710-CC-00400
Originating Judge:J. Curwood Witt |
Benton County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 10/28/98 | |
| Allen Lawrence vs. Town of Brighton
02A01-9801-CV-00020
Originating Judge:Joseph H. Walker, III |
Tipton County | Court of Appeals | 10/28/98 | |
| Dwight Mayton vs State
01C01-9708-CC-00376
|
Cannon County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 10/28/98 | |
| 01C01-0708-CC-00376
01C01-0708-CC-00376
Originating Judge:Don R. Ash |
Cannon County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 10/28/98 | |
| Bob T. Souder v. Health Partners, Inc. - Concurring
02A01-9712-CH-00321
This case involves a contract arbitration clause and the Tennessee Open Meetings Act (Act). Defendant, Health Partners, Inc. (HP), appeals the Chancellor’s order denying its motion to compel arbitration and granting the Plaintiff’s, Dr. Bob T. Souder, M.D. (Souder), motion for judgment on the pleadings.
Authoring Judge: Judge W. Frank Crawford
Originating Judge:Chancellor Joe C. Morris |
Madison County | Court of Appeals | 10/27/98 | |
| 01A01-9709-CH-00557
01A01-9709-CH-00557
Originating Judge:Carol L. Mccoy |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 10/27/98 | |
| Smith vs. Kelley
01A01-9711-CH-00657
Originating Judge:Henry Denmark Bell |
Williamson County | Court of Appeals | 10/27/98 | |
| Griffin vs. Griffin
01A01-9802-CH-00084
Originating Judge:Carol A. Catalano |
Montgomery County | Court of Appeals | 10/27/98 | |
| Thompson vs. Thompson
01A01-9712-CV-00695
Originating Judge:Thomas Goodall |
Sumner County | Court of Appeals | 10/27/98 | |
| William Mcdowell v. Henry I. Siegel Co., Inc. and Royal Insurance Co.
02S01-9710-CV-00088
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance with Tenn. Code Ann. _ 5-6-225(e)(3) for hearing and reporting to the Supreme Court of findings of fact and conclusions of law. The trial judge found that the plaintiff had sustained thirty percent permanent partial disability to each arm and entered judgment accordingly. The defendant employer, Henry I. Siegel Company, Inc. (HIS), and its insurance carrier, Royal Insurance Company, present issue that the thirty percent permanent partial disability to each arm is excessive and should be reduced to approximately ten percent permanent disability to each arm. It was stipulated before trial that the plaintiff had a gradually occurring injury in both arms. The only question that was presented to the trial court was the extent of the disability. The plaintiff testified that he is a high school graduate. He was 47 years of age at the time of his injury. He has worked for the defendant since May, 1967 and continues to work for the defendant as a "packer." The plaintiff testified that in October, 1994 his hands and wrists began hurting. His right hand and wrist hurt more than the left. His hands and wrists continued to hurt, but he continued to work until he had surgery on the right hand on January 9, 1995. After surgery to his right hand, his left hand and arm became much worse. Ultimately he had surgery on the left hand and arm on February 8, 1995. After the surgery on his left hand, both hands continued to pain but the left hand was much worse than the right hand. He went to see Dr. Eugene F. Gulish who performed a second surgery on the left hand on March 12, 1996. Plaintiff testified that after the repeat surgery on the left hand, it improved. However, he continued to have wrist pain and tingling running down three fingers. It was not as bad at the time of trial as before the second surgery, but at times he could not pick up a cup of coffee, open cans of Coke, or open jars. He does not have the grip strength he once had in the left hand. 2
Authoring Judge: F. Lloyd Tatum, Special Judge
Originating Judge:Hon. C. Creed Mcginley, Judge |
Carroll County | Workers Compensation Panel | 10/26/98 | |
| Chrisman vs. Hill Home Development et al
03S01-9706-CV-00077
|
Knox County | Supreme Court | 10/26/98 | |
| Norma J. Baker v. Sally Beauty Supply and The Travelers Insurance Co.
02S01-9709-CH-00078
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance with Tenn. Code Ann. _ 5-6-225(e)(3) for hearing and reporting to the Supreme Court of findings of fact and conclusions of law. The trial judge found the plaintiff had suffered a 55 percent vocational impairment to her left leg and also awarded medical expenses in the amount of $1,112., which the defendant says were unauthorized. The defendant raises the following issues: I. Whether the evidence presented at trial preponderates against the trial court's award of 55% permanent partial disability to plaintiff's left lower extremity as a result of plaintiff's work related accident? II. Whether the medical expenses incurred by the plaintiff were reasonable, necessary and causally related to an injury arising out of the course and scope of employment? We affirm the judgment of the trial court. The plaintiff was injured on December 14, 1994 when a car backed into her and penned her legs between the bumpers of two cars. The plaintiff was performing duties in the course of her work for the defendant when this occurred. The plaintiff had significant injuries to her left leg. As near as we can tell from this record, the plaintiff was absent from work for a week. W hen she wished to return to work, the employer told her she would have to have a release from a physician to return. The employer had not then, nor so far as this record shows never, furnished the plaintiff with a panel of doctors for examination or treatment. The plaintiff was 53 years of age at the time of trial, has a high school education, and has nine months of beauty training. She testified that she continued to work for the defendant for one and a half years after her injury but had difficulty in doing the work because she could not stand for long periods of time and had trouble stooping and bending. We are of the opinion that the resolution of this case turns upon whether the medical evidence offered by the defendant was admissible. The defendant offered as medical proof a memorandum report by James G. Warmbrod, an orthopedic surgeon, as well as various reports from physical 2
Authoring Judge: John K. Byers, Senior Judge
Originating Judge:Hon. Joe C. Morris, |
Madison County | Workers Compensation Panel | 10/26/98 | |
| Connie Covington v. Nagle Industries, Inc.
01S01-9709-CH-00183
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance with Tenn. Code Ann. _ 5-6-225(e)(3) for hearing and reporting to the Supreme Court of findings of fact and conclusions of law. In this case the plaintiff ran afoul of the well-settled principle that the issues in a workers' compensation case, like any other, must be proved by a preponderance of the evidence. The trial judge ruled that the appealing plaintiff failed to carry her burden of proving causation and dismissed her claim for permanent, partial disability benefits. Our review of the findings of fact made by the trial court is de novo upon the record of the trial court, accompanied by a presumption of the correctness of the finding, unless the preponderance of the evidence is otherwise. TENN. CODE ANN. _ 5-6-225(e)(2). Stone v. City of McMinnville, 896 S.W.2d 548, 55 (Tenn. 1995). The plaintiff alleged that on September 9, 1993 she sustained an injury to her elbow, arm, and both wrists, diagnosed as bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome which in the passage of time resulted in permanent, partial disability. The defendant filed its answer admitting that the "plaintiff sustained an injury in the course and scope of plaintiff's employment,"1 and denying all other allegations. The plaintiff testified that she began working for the defendant in May, 1991, doing assembly line work which she described as repetitive.2 After four or five months "into the job," her hands became swollen at the end of the 1But wh en the case was called for trial, the parties stipulated that causatio n was an issue. It prov ed to be dispositive. The answer was not amended, but the case was tried as if the defendant denied causation. 2Likely over-done, since she testified that she processed 8 parts per day. 2
Authoring Judge: William H. Inman, Senior Judge
Originating Judge:Hon. Robert E. Burch |
Houston County | Workers Compensation Panel | 10/26/98 | |
| Chrisman vs. Hill Home Development et al
03S01-9706-CV-00077
|
Knox County | Supreme Court | 10/26/98 | |
| Victor James Cazes vs. State
02S01-9707-CR-00064
Originating Judge:L. Terry Lafferty |
Shelby County | Supreme Court | 10/26/98 |