APPELLATE COURT OPINIONS

Please enter some keywords to search.
State vs. Trampas Sweeney

01C01-9702-CC-00053

Originating Judge:William M. Barker
Williamson County Court of Criminal Appeals 02/27/98
Pehlman vs. Pehlman

03A01-9708-CV-00339
Court of Appeals 02/27/98
State vs. Manning

03C01-9501-CR-00012

Originating Judge:R. Steven Bebb
Bradley County Court of Criminal Appeals 02/27/98
03A01-9708-CV-OO331

03A01-9708-CV-OO331
Anderson County Court of Appeals 02/27/98
Brown vs. Davidson

01A01-9702-CV-00049
Court of Appeals 02/27/98
Bellamy vs. State

03A01-9701-BC-00035
Court of Appeals 02/27/98
Reid vs. Sundquist

01A01-9709-CH-00494

Originating Judge:Carol L. Mccoy
Davidson County Court of Appeals 02/27/98
Slate vs. State

03A01-9708-CV-00369
Court of Appeals 02/27/98
01C01-9608-CR-00347

01C01-9608-CR-00347

Originating Judge:Ann Lacy Johns
Davidson County Court of Criminal Appeals 02/26/98
Debra Tipton vs. John Harris

02A01-9706-CV-00114
Shelby County Court of Appeals 02/26/98
Ronnie Bradfield vs. Stephanie Cole, et al

02A01-9707-CV-00171

Originating Judge:R. Lee Moore Jr.
Lake County Court of Appeals 02/26/98
Greenback vs. Loudon

03A01-9706-CV-00207

Originating Judge:Russell E. Simmons, Jr.
Loudon County Court of Appeals 02/26/98
State vs. Gabriel Blackman

02C01-9704-CC-00135

Originating Judge:Jon Kerry Blackwood
McNairy County Court of Criminal Appeals 02/26/98
01C01-9512-CR-00414

01C01-9512-CR-00414
Davidson County Court of Criminal Appeals 02/26/98
Virginia vs. Wagner

03A01-9705-CH-00177

Originating Judge:Frank V. Williams, III
Knox County Court of Appeals 02/26/98
01C01-9602-CC-00052

01C01-9602-CC-00052
Rutherford County Court of Criminal Appeals 02/26/98
State vs. Dewayne Cathey

02C01-9612-CR-00446

Originating Judge:W. Fred Axley
Shelby County Court of Criminal Appeals 02/26/98
03C01-9608-CR-00309

03C01-9608-CR-00309

Originating Judge:Frank L. Slaughter
Sullivan County Court of Criminal Appeals 02/25/98
State vs. Crain

03C01-9604-CC-00149
Unicoi County Court of Criminal Appeals 02/25/98
State vs. Alfonzo Chalmers

W2000-00440-CCA-R3-CD
The defendant appeals from his conviction for first degree premeditated murder. He contends that the evidence is insufficient to support the conviction and that the trial court erred by impermissibly commenting on the evidence in violation of article VI, section 9 of the Constitution of Tennessee. We affirm the judgment of conviction.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Joseph M. Tipton
Originating Judge:Chris B. Craft
Shelby County Court of Criminal Appeals 02/25/98
State vs. Jones

03C01-9701-CR-00016

Originating Judge:Douglas A. Meyer
Hamilton County Court of Criminal Appeals 02/25/98
State vs. Millsaps

03C01-9601-CC-00044
Monroe County Court of Criminal Appeals 02/25/98
State vs. Jeffery Casey

02C01-9701-CC-00015

Originating Judge:Julian P. Guinn
Decatur County Court of Criminal Appeals 02/24/98
Joseph D. Lewis v. The Yasuda Fire & Marine Ins. Co., et al.

01S01-9702-CV-00036
Authoring Judge: William S. Russell, Retired Judge
Originating Judge:Hon.
Lewis County Workers Compensation Panel 02/24/98
Ulyes Williams v. City of Knoxville

03S01-9706-CV-00070
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance with Tenn. Code Ann. section 5-6-225(e)(3) for hearing and reporting of findings of fact and conclusions of law. The City of Knoxville contends (1) the claim is barred by the statute of limitations and (2) the trial court erred in not accepting the opinion testimony of the treating physician. The claimant contends the trial court erred in allowing credit for overpaid temporary total disability benefits. The panel has concluded the judgment should be affirmed. The claimant, Williams, has less than an eighth grade education, little or no reading or writing skills and no vocational training. He was 39 years old at the time of the trial. He has worked for the city since about 1988, first as a laborer and later as tractor-mower operator. In 1992, he suffered a compensable back injury, was temporarily disabled and returned to work until September 18, 1995, when he re-injured his back at work. Back surgery was performed on or about November 18, 1995 and he returned to work around March 1, 1996 for a few weeks, quit because of post-surgical problems, then returned again around July 1, 1996. He has since been terminated. This civil action was commenced on March 29, 1996. The defendant filed and served its answer on April 26, 1996, but did not aver therein that the claim was barred by any statute of limitations. That a claim is so barred is an affirmative defense and the facts constituting such defense must be set forth in short and plain terms in a defendant's answer. Tenn. R. Civ. P. 8.3. Moreover, the record fails to establish that the claimant had fair notice of the employer's intention to assert the statute of limitations as a defense. The defense was thus waived. Tenn. R. Civ. P. 12.8. Additionally, the panel finds the defense to be without merit. The first issue is resolved in favor of the appellee. As the employer insists, citing Orman v. Williams Sonoma, Inc., 83 S.W.2d 672, 676 (Tenn. 1991), the trial judge must choose which of conflicting expert medical opinions to accept. We are aware of no rule which 2
Authoring Judge: Joe C. Loser, Jr., Special Judge
Originating Judge:Hon. Dale C. Workman
Knox County Workers Compensation Panel 02/24/98