State vs. Maurice Johnson
03C01-9705-CR-00175
Originating Judge:Richard R. Baumgartner |
Knox County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 02/13/98 | |
Robert Martin vs. Union Planters
02A01-9708-CV-00179
Originating Judge:Robert A. Lanier |
Shelby County | Court of Appeals | 02/12/98 | |
State vs. Raymond Jones
02C01-9705-CC-00162
|
Madison County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 02/12/98 | |
State vs. Steven Culps
02C01-9705-CC-00163
|
Madison County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 02/12/98 | |
State vs. Kevin Hyman & Karen Russell
02C01-9612-CR-00454
|
Shelby County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 02/12/98 | |
State vs. Rickey Nelson
02C01-9607-CR-00223
Originating Judge:John P. Colton, Jr. |
Shelby County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 02/12/98 | |
Mildred Daniel vs. James Daniel
02A01-9606-CH-00135
Originating Judge:Floyd Peete, Jr. |
Shelby County | Court of Appeals | 02/12/98 | |
State vs. Kenneth Johnson
02C01-9612-CR-00476
Originating Judge:James C. Beasley, Jr. |
Shelby County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 02/12/98 | |
State vs. Christopher Parker
01C01-9701-CR-00037
|
Davidson County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 02/11/98 | |
State vs. Larry Holbrooks
01C01-9701-CR-00011
|
Davidson County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 02/11/98 | |
State vs. James Jones
01C01-9612-CC-00522
Originating Judge:Charles D. Haston, Sr. |
Van Buren County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 02/11/98 | |
McGlothlin vs. Bristol
03A01-9706-CV-00236
|
Court of Appeals | 02/11/98 | ||
State vs. Timothy Brown
01C01-9701-CR-00032
Originating Judge:J. Randall Wyatt, Jr. |
Davidson County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 02/11/98 | |
State vs. Judy Leath
01C01-9511-CC-00393
|
Macon County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 02/10/98 | |
State vs. Harry Reed
01C01-9701-CC-00007
|
Williamson County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 02/10/98 | |
Stephens vs. Revco
03A01-9708-CV-00351
|
Court of Appeals | 02/10/98 | ||
Worley vs. State
03A01-9708-JV-00366
|
Court of Appeals | 02/10/98 | ||
State vs. Gaylen Rhodes
02C01-9703-CC-00121
Originating Judge:C. Creed Mcginley |
Hardin County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 02/10/98 | |
Knoll vs. Knoll
03A01-9707-CH-00275
|
Court of Appeals | 02/10/98 | ||
State vs. Mark Rawlings
02C01-9612-CR-00475
Originating Judge:Joseph B. Mccartie |
Shelby County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 02/10/98 | |
State vs. Darwin Windham
02C01-9705-CC-00196
|
Weakley County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 02/10/98 | |
Donald Neil Pierce, v. Branda Ann Radford Pierce
03A01-9707-GS-00250
This is a divorce case. On appeal, Brenda Pierce (wife) raises the issues of whether the tril court erred by refusing to grant her periodic alimony, by failing to grant her the divorce, and by failing to grant her discretionary costs and attorney's fees. We modify the judgment and affirm as modified.
Authoring Judge: Judge Don T. McMurray
Originating Judge:Judge Thomas A. Austin |
Roane County | Court of Appeals | 02/09/98 | |
Cheri Owens Tuncay v. Engin Halif Tuncay - Concurring
02A01-9709-CH-00209
This is a divorce case. Plaintiff-appellant Cheri Owens Tuncay was granted a divorce on the ground of inappropriate marital conduct. Mrs. Tuncay appeals the trial court’s division of the marital debts as well as the court’s failure to award her alimony beyond $5,000 in attorney fees.
Authoring Judge: Judge W. Frank Crawford
Originating Judge:Chancellor D. J. Alissandratos |
Shelby County | Court of Appeals | 02/09/98 | |
Larry Stephen Roseberry, v. Janis Roseberry
03A01-9706-CH-00237
In this divorce action, the appellant (husband) appeals from the judgment of the trial court questioning the amount of child support he was ordered to pay, the division of marital property and alimony, including the amount, nature, and duration. The appellee (wife) seeks attorney fees for this appeal. No issue is presented relating to the granting of the divorce. We note that at the time of the trial, the husbanc had more than enough life insurance in force to satisfy this requirement.
Authoring Judge: Judge Don T. McMurray
Originating Judge:Judge Earle G. Murphy |
Knox County | Court of Appeals | 02/09/98 | |
Roger Perry and Doris Perry, v. Donald Van Hise and Josephine Van Hise, Individually and D/B/A Van Hise Construction Company
01A01-9705-CH-00227
This appeal involves the construction of a home. Plaintiffs engaged one of the defendants, Donald Van Hise, (hereafter, the defendant) to construct a home on their property. On May 24, 1994, defendant signed a proposal to construct the house, reserving the right to withdraw the proposal within 30 days, if not accepted by plaintiff. One of the plaintiffs signed an acceptance of the proposal. The other did not. On June 25, 1994, defendant tendered another proposal on different terms, which proposal was accepted by both plaintiffs. The second proposal contained an estimated time of completion of 3-1/2 - 4-1/2 months. Both proposals contained a base contract price subject to revision for changes during construction. Both contracts refer to “plans and specifications” but the record contains no plan and only a partial set of specifications. The plans and specifications were not specifically prepared for plaintiffs, but were “generic,” that is, sold on the general market, to be altered as desired; and alterations were made, producing part of the present controversy. Promptly after the second proposal was accepted.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Henry F. Todd
Originating Judge:Judge Charles D. Haston, Sr. |
Court of Appeals | 02/06/98 |