Please enter some keywords to search.
Huang vs. Gates vs. Huang
01A01-9709-CV-00462
Originating Judge:Marietta M. Shipley |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 04/29/98 | |
IN RE: Swanay
03A01-9712-PB-00542
Originating Judge:Inman |
Court of Appeals | 04/29/98 | ||
State vs. Harry McLemore
02C01-9711-CC-00436
|
Lauderdale County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 04/29/98 | |
State vs. Fowler
03C01-9709-CC-00391
Originating Judge:J. Curwood Witt |
Jefferson County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 04/29/98 | |
McGill vs. Hendrix
01A01-9709-PB-00536
|
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 04/29/98 | |
03A01-9708-CV-00377
03A01-9708-CV-00377
|
Court of Appeals | 04/29/98 | ||
State vs. James Crawford
02C01-9712-CR-00471
|
Shelby County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 04/29/98 | |
Vaughn vs. Vaughn
01A01-9707-CV-00347
Originating Judge:Muriel Robinson |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 04/29/98 | |
Bickford vs. Bickford
01A01-9711-CH-00645
|
Rutherford County | Court of Appeals | 04/29/98 | |
Jimmy H. Vaughn, v. Mary Runyon Vaughn
01A01-9707-CV-00347
The trial court found that there had been a change of circumstances and increased Jimmy Hunter Vaughn’s [husband’s] alimony obligation to Mary Runyon Vaughn [wife] from $400.00 per month to $600.00 per month. The court also found that husband should pay $350.00 as reasonable attorney fees to wife’s attorney
Authoring Judge: Senior Judge William H. Inman
Originating Judge:Judge Muriel Robinson |
Court of Appeals | 04/29/98 | ||
Spencer vs. Hutchison
03A01-9712-CV-00522
|
Court of Appeals | 04/29/98 | ||
Calkins vs. Calkins
03A01-9709-CH-00413
|
Sevier County | Court of Appeals | 04/29/98 | |
Greenman vs. Hutchins
03A01-9709-CV-00404
|
Court of Appeals | 04/29/98 | ||
Northcott vs. Dept. of Correction
01A01-9707-CH-00355
Originating Judge:Ellen Hobbs Lyle |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 04/29/98 | |
03C01-9706-CC-00215
03C01-9706-CC-00215
Originating Judge:Ray L. Jenkins |
Knox County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 04/29/98 | |
State vs. Jon Hall
02C01-9703-CC-00095
Originating Judge:Whit A. Lafon |
Madison County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 04/29/98 | |
Allman vs. Allman
M1997-00251-COA-R3-CV
This appeal involves a dispute over the interpretation of a provision in the marital dissolution agreement giving the wife an automobile but requiring the husband to continue making the car payments. After the automobile was totally destroyed in a one-vehicle accident, the wife's insurance company paid the balance remaining on the car loan. After the husband refused to pay the wife an amount equal to the balance of the car loan, the wife filed a petition in the Circuit Court for Sumner County seeking to hold him in contempt. Following a bench trial, the trial judge ordered the husband to pay the wife $7,644.22 representing the balance of the loan when the automobile was destroyed, as well as $1,355 for her legal expenses. We have determined that the marital dissolution agreement allocated the risk of loss of the automobile to the wife and, therefore, reverse the $7,644.22 judgment. We have also determined that the $1,355 judgment must be vacated and that the case should be remanded for further proceedings.
Authoring Judge: Judge William C. Koch, Jr.
Originating Judge:Thomas Goodall |
Sumner County | Court of Appeals | 04/29/98 | |
Branum vs. Akins
03A01-9709-CH-00418
|
Hamilton County | Court of Appeals | 04/28/98 | |
Pritchett vs. Pritchett
03A01-9708-CH-00362
|
Sullivan County | Court of Appeals | 04/28/98 | |
Jarrett vs. Starkey
03A01-9706-JV-00223
|
Hamilton County | Court of Appeals | 04/28/98 | |
Swoffard vs. Del Pino-McClarty
03A01-9707-CV-00454
|
Hamilton County | Court of Appeals | 04/28/98 | |
State vs. McKee
03C01-9603-CR-00092
|
Court of Criminal Appeals | 04/28/98 | ||
State vs. Byrd
03S01-9705-CR-00057
Originating Judge:Rex Henry Ogle |
Supreme Court | 04/27/98 | ||
Pam Ogren v. Housecall Health Care, Inc.
03S01-9706-CH-00078
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance with Tenn. Code Ann. _ 5-6-225(e)(3) for hearing and reporting to the Supreme Court of findings of fact and conclusions of law. The trial judge found the plaintiff had sustained a 7 percent permanent vocational impairment as a result of an on-the-job injury. The defendant says the evidence preponderates against the award of 7 percent and says the trial judge should have limited the award to 2.5 times the medical impairment rating because the plaintiff failed to return to work when she was afforded a job within her medical limitations. We affirm the judgment of the trial court. The undisputed evidence shows the plaintiff was injured on December 16, 1994 as she performed her duties as a certified nursing assistant for the defendant. The plaintiff was assisting a paraplegic patient to dress at the time of the injury. The patient had raised himself on a trapeze bar by his arms and the plaintiff was attempting to dress his lower body. The base of the bar moved onto the plaintiff's left shoe. The plaintiff pushed on the bar to free her foot. The plaintiff heard a "pop" in her left shoulder and began to experience pain in her neck, shoulder, arm, and hand. It appears the plaintiff had some medical care at Athens Community Hospital; however, there is little in the record concerning this treatment. On March 27, 1995, the plaintiff was seen by Joel B. Ragland, a neurosurgeon in Knoxville. Dr. Ragland conducted examination and testing and found the plaintiff had a rather large disc rupture at C5-6 and C6-7. Dr. Ragland concluded surgery was required for the plaintiff's injury and this was done on April 21, 1995. Dr. Ragland did an anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion on the effected vertebrae. Dr. Ragland continued to see the plaintiff until October 1995 at which time he released her and found she had suffered a ten percent medical impairment to the body as a whole. Dr. Ragland was of the opinion the plaintiff could return to work with a ten pound lifting restriction. 2
Authoring Judge: John K. Byers, Senior Judge
Originating Judge:Hon. Frank V. Williams, |
Knox County | Workers Compensation Panel | 04/27/98 | |
Earhart vs. City of Bristol
03S01-9709-CH-00116
|
Supreme Court | 04/27/98 |