Please enter some keywords to search.
Anita Gardner v. World Color Press, Inc.
02S01-9609-CH-00081
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance with Tenn. Code Ann. section 5-6-225 (e)(3) for hearing and reporting to the Supreme Court of findings of fact and conclusions of law. The issue presented is whether the trial court erred in finding that the plaintiff sustained a 2 per cent (2%) permanent partial disability to both arms. The standard of review is de novo upon the record of the trial court, accompanied by a presumption of the correctness of the finding, unless the preponderance of the evidence is otherwise. Tenn. R. App. P. 13(d); T.C.A. Section 5-6-225(e)(2). The panel finds that the evidence does not preponderate against the finding of the trial court and concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The employee, Anita Gardner, is thirty (3) years old and has a tenth (1th) grade education. She has obtained her GED and is currently enrolled in Dyersburg State Community College intending to become a nurse. She has worked for McDonalds Restaurant, Taco Casa Restaurant, Roseoco Gas Station and Doubleday Book Company. She went to work for World Color Press, Inc., in 1987. World Color Press prints, assembles and ships magazines. During much of her employment, she worked twelve (12) hours per day, seven (7) days a week. Her duties involved the use of her hands and wrists in a constant, fast paced, repetitive manner for long periods of time. In May of 1994, the plaintiff injured her left wrist (she is left handed), while using a manual banding device in the shipping department. In August of 1994, she began having trouble with her right wrist while working in the quality control 2
Authoring Judge: Leonard W. Martin, Special Judge
Originating Judge:Hon. Joe G. Riley, |
Dyer County | Workers Compensation Panel | 04/17/97 | |
State vs. Riffey
03C01-9602-CC-00074
Originating Judge:Frank L. Slaughter |
Sullivan County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 04/17/97 | |
State vs. Buford
03C01-9603-CR-00096
Originating Judge:Stephen M. Bevil |
Hamilton County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 04/17/97 | |
Pamela Sue Higgins v. Angelica Corporation
02S01-9605-CV-00050
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance with Tenn. Code Ann. section 5-6-225(e)(3) for hearing and reporting to the Supreme Court of findings of fact and conclusions of law. Defendant appeals from the trial court's award of 45 per cent (45%) permanent partial vocational disability of each arm, following surgery on each wrist for carpal tunnel syndrome. Defendant raises three (3) issues, that the plaintiff's injuries are not causually related to her employment and therefore, not compensable; that the plaintiff did not give proper notice as required by Tenn. Code Ann. section 5-6-21; and that the preponderance of the evidence does not support the trial judge's finding that the plaintiff suffered a 45 per cent (45%) permanent partial vocational disability to each arm. The panel has concluded that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The employee, Ms. Pamela Sue Higgins, is thirty-eight (38) years old, quit school in the eighth (8th) grade, and she has performed sewing work for different manufacturers for twenty (2) years. Ms. Higgins began her employment with Angelica on January 14, 1991. Shortly after going to work for Angelica she was seen by Doctor James H. Thomas, a family practitioner, with the specific complaint that her right wrist had hurt for five (5) days. Approximately two and one-half (2 l/2) months later she returned to Doctor Thomas with the same complaint. Doctor Thomas soon concluded that her problem was carpal tunnel syndrome in nature and referred her to Doctor L. David Johnson, an orthopaedic surgeon, for treatment. After treating her conservatively, excluding other possible causes of her symptoms, and based upon electrodiagnostic studies performed by Doctor Ron Bingham, on May 13, 1991, Doctor Johnson diagnosed her as having moderate carpal tunnel syndrome on the right, and severe carpal tunnel syndrome on the left. Doctor Johnson subsequently performed carpal tunnel surgeries on both right and left wrists. She was also seen by Doctors Cohn and Cramer, and Pechacek, in consultation, in the process of eliminating other causes for her symptoms and confirming her diagnosis. Doctor 2
Authoring Judge: Leonard W. Martin, Special Judge
Originating Judge:Hon. C. Creed Mcginley |
Hardin County | Workers Compensation Panel | 04/17/97 | |
James Clifford Tatum v. Methodist Health Systems, et al
02S01-9609-CH-00079
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance with Tenn. Code Ann. section 5-6-225 (e)(3) for hearing and reporting to the Supreme Court of findings of fact and conclusions of law. The director of the Workers' Compensation Division of Tennessee Department of Labor, as trustee for the Second Injury Fund (Second Injury Fund), appeals from the decision of the trial court. The court approved, over the objection of the Second Injury Fund, a settlement agreement between the employee, James Clifford Tatum, and the employer, Methodist Health Systems (Methodist Hospital of Dyersburg, Inc.), limiting the employer's liability to benefits based on 31 per cent (31%) permanent partial disability to the whole body. The claim against the Second Injury Fund was reserved until trial. The trial of the case was between the employee and the Second InjuryFund. Subsequently, at trial, the trial court found the employee to be permanently and totally disabled and held the Second Injury Fund liable for 6 per cent (6%) of that total disability. Because the court erred in approving the settlement over the objectionof the Second Injury Fund, the panel concludes that both judgments should be set aside, and the case remanded for a new trial on all issues. The trial court recognized its error and stated in its memorandum opinion of April 29, 1996, as follows: "This settlement was approved over the objection of the Fund. In retrospect, the Court should not have approved the settlement over the objection of the Fund, but should have tried both claims together." However, the trial court apparently believed that it had cured its error. We conclude otherwise. In a very recent case decided by the Supreme Court on December 23, 1996, the court reasoned as follows: Here, the trial court approved a settlement concerning the 2
Authoring Judge: Leonard W. Martin, Special Judge
Originating Judge:Martin, Judge |
Dyer County | Workers Compensation Panel | 04/17/97 | |
03S01-9511-CC-00360
03S01-9511-CC-00360
Originating Judge:R. Jerry Beck |
Sullivan County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 04/17/97 | |
Fred Bowen vs. Billy Compton
02C01-9701-CC-00016
|
Lake County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 04/17/97 | |
Jack v. Delany
02S01-9608-CH-00073
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance with Tenn. Code Ann. section 5-6-225(e)(3) for hearing and reporting to the Supreme Court of findings of fact and conclusions of law. In this appeal, the employer questions the award of permanent partial disability benefits as being excessive. As discussed below, the panel has concluded the judgment should be modified. The employee, Scott, is forty-seven (47) years old, and has an eighth (8th) grade education. He has farmed and worked at a cotton gin. He has no specialized skills or training. He has an I.Q. of sixty-five (65) and a severe speech impediment. He worked for the defendant employer for twenty-two (22) years. During the course of his employment, he has performed various jobs and was operating a scrubber at the time of his injury. The employee was injured at work on June 4, 1994, when he was getting off of the scrubber and fell. He testified that he hurt his neck, back, and left shoulder. He was first seen by Doctor Michael Heck, who prescribed medication and returned him to work on light duty. He was then seen by Doctor Stewart, who returned him to regular duty with the defendant. Doctor Riley Jones treated the plaintiff and opined that he had a 1 per cent (1%) anatomical impairment to the left upper extremity. Dr. Jones gave him no impairment rating for his back and sent him back to regular duty. Dr. Robert Paul Christopher saw the plaintiff on July 24, 1995, for an independent medical evaluation. He opined that the plaintiff had a 1 per cent (1%) impairment to the left upper extremity, a 6 per cent (6%) impairment as a result of injury to the cervical spine, translating to a combined rating of 12 per cent (12%) to the body as a whole. 2
Authoring Judge: Leonard W. Martin, Special Judge
Originating Judge:Hon. J. Steven Stafford, |
Scott County | Workers Compensation Panel | 04/17/97 | |
Gregory Turner vs. Jimmy Harrison
02C01-9701-CC-00025
|
Lauderdale County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 04/17/97 | |
02A01-9510-CV-00240
02A01-9510-CV-00240
Originating Judge:George R. Ellis |
Haywood County | Court of Appeals | 04/16/97 | |
Roberts vs. Lowe
03A01-9610-CC-00333
Originating Judge:Arden L. Hill |
Johnson County | Court of Appeals | 04/16/97 | |
El Rayford vs. Stephen Leffler (Order)
02A01-9607-CV-00162
|
Court of Appeals | 04/16/97 | ||
Brian Grant vs. Tonya Grant
02A01-9603-CV-00053
Originating Judge:Wyeth Chandler |
Court of Appeals | 04/16/97 | ||
03C01-9601-CC-00016
03C01-9601-CC-00016
Originating Judge:E. Eugene Eblen |
Roane County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 04/16/97 | |
State vs. John F. Wolard
01C01-9612-CC-00532
|
Montgomery County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 04/16/97 | |
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Knox County | Court of Appeals | 04/16/97 | |
01A01-9508-CV-00377
01A01-9508-CV-00377
Originating Judge:Don R. Ash |
Rutherford County | Court of Appeals | 04/16/97 | |
Gloria Gilliland vs. Gary Stanley
02A01-9603-GS-00056
Originating Judge:William A. Peeler |
Tipton County | Court of Appeals | 04/16/97 | |
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Hamblen County | Court of Appeals | 04/16/97 | |
State., ex. rel., vs. United Physicians Ins.
01A01-9610-CH-00449
Originating Judge:Robert S. Brandt |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 04/16/97 | |
01A01-9610-JV-00493
01A01-9610-JV-00493
Originating Judge:Barry R. Brown |
Sumner County | Court of Appeals | 04/16/97 | |
Hymel vs. Hymel
01A01-9703-CV-00136
Originating Judge:Muriel Robinson |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 04/11/97 | |
Warren, et. vir vs. Metro Gov't., et. al.
01A01-9606-CV-00277
Originating Judge:Thomas W. Brothers |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 04/11/97 | |
Bryant vs. TN. Dept. of Safety
01A01-9509-CH-00398
Originating Judge:Robert S. Brandt |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 04/11/97 | |
Sliger vs. Stokes, et. al.
01A01-9609-CH-00403
Originating Judge:Vernon Neal |
Putnam County | Court of Appeals | 04/11/97 |