APPELLATE COURT OPINIONS

Please enter some keywords to search.
Timothy Crabtree v. Apac Tennessee, Inc.

03S01-9603-CH-00035
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance with TENN. CODE ANN. _ 5-6-225(e)(3) for hearing and reporting to the Supreme Court of findings of fact and conclusions of law. The trial judge found the plaintiff had sustained an injury to his knee and back arising out of and in the course of his employment with the defendant. The trial court awarded the plaintiff 3% permanent partial disability to the leg as a result of the knee injury and 25% permanent partial disability to the body as a whole as a result of the back injury. The defendant says the trial judge erroneously found the plaintiff had given notice of an accidental injury to his back and says, also, that the awards for the injuries were erroneous. We affirm the judgment of the trial court. Injury to the Knee During March 1992, the plaintiff injured his right knee. He was treated by Dr. Paul Naylor for this injury. Dr. Naylor performed surgery on the plaintiff's knee on October 13, 1992 to repair the damage sustained by the plaintiff. Dr. Naylor testified the plaintiff had a 12% medical impairment to his knee as a result of the accident, which the defendant does not dispute. We find the evidence does not preponderate against the evidence of 3% permanent partial disability to the leg found by the trial judge, and we affirm the judgment thereon. T.C.A. _ 5-6-225(e)(2). Injury to the Back The plaintiff testified he injured his back in April 1993 when he reached back to lock the tailgate of a truck he was driving in the course of his employment. He testified he gave notice of the injury to his supervisor, James Hawkins, and the safety director, Steve Bell. Hawkins and Bell testified the plaintiff did not give them notice of an accidental injury as he testified. They testified the plaintiff related that the back pain he was having was connected to, or was a result of, the knee injury. 2
Authoring Judge: Senior Judge John K. Byers
Originating Judge:Hon. H. David Cate
Knox County Workers Compensation Panel 12/19/96
Johnny Ownby v. National American Insurance Company

03S01-9604-CV-00037
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance with TENN. CODE ANN. _ 5-6-225(e)(3) for hearing and reporting to the Supreme Court of findings of fact and conclusions of law. The trial court awarded plaintiff 48% permanent partial disability to the body as a whole at a compensation rate of $266.66 per week. Defendant challenges the amount of disability awarded, the compensation rate applied and certain discretionary costs awarded. Plaintiff, 37, graduated from high school. Most of his work experience has been in heavy construction labor. He testified that he injured his lower back on July 4, 1994, while digging up an asphalt driveway and loading the asphalt chunks onto a truck for defendant's insured. He worked on light duty until October but has not worked since October.1994. Plaintiff was treated by Alan L. Whiton, M.D., an orthopedist, who testified in this case by deposition. He opined that plaintiff had a disruption or internal cracking of L4-L5 based upon the results of a discogram. He assigned plaintiff a five percent permanent impairment rating to the body as a whole according to the AMA Guides. George B. Brooks, D.O., a family practitioner, examined the plaintiff at the request of his attorney. He diagnosed degenerative disc disease with radiculopathy at L4-5 by history. He assigned a ten percent impairment rating according to the American Orthopedic Academy guidelines. He testified that he would not disagree with Dr. Whiton's five percent impairment rating but that he also considered that plaintiff had over six months of subjective complaints of pain. He further testified that some portion of his impairment rating was attributable to degenerative changes that predated plaintiff's work-related injury, but he could not apportion it. Fred A. Killefer, M.D., neurosurgeon, examined plaintiff at the request of the defendant. He found no objective signs of a permanent injury and opined that plaintiff had a normal spine with subjective complaints of pain. He further opined 2
Authoring Judge: Senior Judge John K. Byers
Originating Judge:Hon. Rex Henry Ogle,
Knox County Workers Compensation Panel 12/19/96
John D. Baggett v. Firemen's Fund Insurance Company

01S01-9603-CH-00055
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance with Tenn. Code Ann. _ 5-6-225(e)(3) for hearing and reporting to the Supreme Court of findings of fact and conclusions of law. The complaint alleges "[t]hat on or about the 22nd day of June, 1993, the Plaintiff, while operating a printing press, had his left thumb amputated when it became caught in the press." In point of fact, he suffered an "avulsive injury of the distal aspect of his thumb, just distal to the IP joint with nerve and vascular damage within the thumb proximal to the point of severance." The thumb fragment could not be re-attached and the amputation was surgically completed at the level of the interphalangeal joint, resulting in the loss of one-half of the thumb. The defendant admitted the material allegations of the complaint and essentially conceded that the plaintiff was entitled to recover benefits for the loss of a thumb. Notwithstanding that the complaint did not allege disability to the hand, the issue at trial was whether the injury so affected the hand as to justify an award for benefits thereto rather than for the loss of a scheduled member. The Chancellor limited benefits to the loss of the thumb; the employee appeals insisting that he is entitled to benefits for resultant partial permanent disability to his hand. The treating surgeon was Dr. Bruce Shack, a reconstructive specialist from the Vanderbilt Medical Center. He testified: Q. Now, Doctor, have you formed an opinion based upon a reasonable degree of medical certainty whether or not this injury Mr. Baggett suffered will result in any permanent impairment? A. Yes, sir, I have. Q. Will you tell the Court what that opinion is, sir. A. Well, this is a relatively straight forward type of case where the amputation through the interphalangeal joint of the thumb allows us to utilize the Guides that are set forth in the American Medical Association's Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment and basing Mr. Baggett's impairment on the loss of the thumb through the interphalangeal joint, I had rated him as 2 percent impairment of the hand. And, of course, that using the conversion tables equals an 18 percent impairment of the upper extremity and 11 percent impairment of the whole person. Q. Now, the injury to the thumb and hand as you've indicated, is that in anyway affected by the upper extremity? 2
Authoring Judge: William H. Inman, Senior Judge
Originating Judge:Hon. Robert S. Brandt,
Davidson County Workers Compensation Panel 12/19/96
Richard Thomas Johnson v. State of Tennessee

W2001-02373-CCA-R3-CD

Originating Judge:Joseph H. Walker, III
Lauderdale County Court of Criminal Appeals 12/19/96
James R. Rose and wife, Stella Kay Rose, v. Dennis R. Rice, Janice Rice and John Doe

02A01-9509-CV-00198

This is a negligence case involving the head-on collision of two vehicles. Appellants James
and Stella Rose were struck by the car of Appellees Dennis and Janice Rice when Dennis Rice
applied his brakes to avoid hitting a vehicle which turned across his lane. The trial court granted
summary judgment in favor of the Rices. We reverse.

 

Authoring Judge: Judge Holly Kirby Lillard
Originating Judge:Judge Charles O. Mcpherson
Henderson County Court of Appeals 12/19/96
William Valdez, & Miguel Pineda v. Lang Environmental

01S01-9605-CH-00085
This case is before the Court upon the entire record, including the order of referral to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel, and the Panel's Memorandum Opinion setting forth its findings of fact and conclusions of law, which are incorporated herein by reference.
Authoring Judge: Per Curiam
Originating Judge:Hon. Robert S. Brandt,
Davidson County Workers Compensation Panel 12/19/96
Ray v. Stanton, App. No. 88-285-Ii, 1989 Wl 14135 (Tenn. Ct. App. Feb. 24,

01A01-9603-CH-00140
Court of Appeals 12/18/96
01A01-9606-CH-00256

01A01-9606-CH-00256

Originating Judge:Robert S. Brandt
Davidson County Court of Appeals 12/18/96
01A01-9510-CH-00430

01A01-9510-CH-00430

Originating Judge:Robert S. Brandt
Court of Appeals 12/18/96
01A01-9603-CH-00140

01A01-9603-CH-00140

Originating Judge:Donald P. Harris
Hickman County Court of Appeals 12/18/96
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX

X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
Washington County Court of Appeals 12/18/96
01A01-9604-PB-00163

01A01-9604-PB-00163

Originating Judge:Joe P. Binkley, Sr.
Davidson County Court of Appeals 12/18/96
01A01-9606-CH-00256

01A01-9606-CH-00256

Originating Judge:Robert S. Brandt
Davidson County Court of Appeals 12/18/96
Seffernick vs. St. Thomas Hospital

01A01-9606-CV-00282

Originating Judge:Thomas W. Brothers
Davidson County Court of Appeals 12/18/96
01A01-9609-CH-00426

01A01-9609-CH-00426

Originating Judge:Irvin H. Kilcrease, Jr.
Davidson County Court of Appeals 12/18/96
01A01-9605-CV-00230

01A01-9605-CV-00230

Originating Judge:Walter C. Kurtz
Davidson County Court of Appeals 12/18/96
Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Taylor Barton Mills

03S01-9601-CH-00008
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance with Tenn. Code Ann. section 5-6-225(e)(3) for hearing and reporting of findings of fact and conclusions of law. In this appeal, the employee contends the evidence preponderates against the trial court's finding that his injury was caused by intoxication. The panel concludes the judgment should be reversed. On February 15, 1995, the employee or claimant, Mills, was working at his job as a machinist using a large lathe to bore a specifically sized hole into a fifty inch bull gear. After stopping the lathe to take a measurement, he accidentally - perhaps negligently - brushed against the lathe's starter button. The lathe started and the claimant's clothing was caught in the turning lathe. As a result, he was injured. Tests done at the University of Tennessee Medical Center shortly after the accident revealed a high level of cannaboid concentration from probable chronic use of marijuana. The claimant admits to being a chronic user of marijuana and had admittedly smoked two or three "joints" on the evening before the accident. Additionally, two witnesses testified that they thoughtthey saw him from some one hundred feet away, sharing a joint with another employee on the morning of the accident, before beginning work. The claimant and other employee denied it. The employer knew Mills was a heavy marijuana user and had fired him for thirty days on a previous occasion for "suspected" use of the substance, but re-hired him 3 days later at a higher rate of pay. An expert, without examining the claimant, opined from lab test results that marijuana intoxication was a possible contributing cause of his 2
Authoring Judge: Joe C. Loser, Jr., Special Judge
Originating Judge:Hon. Dennis H. Inman,
Knox County Workers Compensation Panel 12/18/96
Seffernick vs. St. Thomas Hospital

01A01-9606-CV-00282

Originating Judge:Thomas W. Brothers
Davidson County Court of Appeals 12/18/96
01A01-9607-CV-00304

01A01-9607-CV-00304

Originating Judge:James E. Walton
Montgomery County Court of Appeals 12/18/96
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX

X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
Court of Appeals 12/17/96
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX

X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
Loudon County Court of Appeals 12/17/96
State vs. Ervin

03C01-9707-CC-00311
Blount County Court of Criminal Appeals 12/17/96
03C01-9506-CC-00176

03C01-9506-CC-00176

Originating Judge:D. Kelly Thomas, Jr.
Blount County Court of Criminal Appeals 12/17/96
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX

X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
Marion County Court of Appeals 12/17/96
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX

X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
Loudon County Court of Appeals 12/17/96