Please enter some keywords to search.
| Copper Cellar vs. Miller
03A01-9607-CV-00239
|
Knox County | Court of Appeals | 04/29/97 | |
| Williams vs. Sugar Cove
03A01-9605-CH-00175
|
Monroe County | Court of Appeals | 04/29/97 | |
| State vs. Moore
03C01-9604-CC-00163
|
Carter County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 04/29/97 | |
| State vs. Marvin Mathews
02C01-9512-CC-00366
Originating Judge:Joseph H. Walker, III |
Lauderdale County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 04/28/97 | |
| Moore vs. State
03S01-9607-CR-00073
|
Supreme Court | 04/28/97 | ||
| State vs. Henry Eugene Hodges
01S01-9505-CR-00080
Originating Judge:Walter C. Kurtz |
Davidson County | Supreme Court | 04/28/97 | |
| X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Court of Appeals | 04/28/97 | ||
| 02C01-9603-CR-00075
02C01-9603-CR-00075
Originating Judge:W. Fred Axley |
Shelby County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 04/28/97 | |
| 02C01-9701-CC-00038
02C01-9701-CC-00038
|
Lake County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 04/28/97 | |
| State vs. Barry L. Speck
02S01-9601-CR-00001
Originating Judge:L. Terry Lafferty |
Supreme Court | 04/28/97 | ||
| State vs. Henry Eugene Hodges
01S01-9505-CR-00080
|
Davidson County | Supreme Court | 04/28/97 | |
| X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Court of Appeals | 04/28/97 | ||
| X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Court of Appeals | 04/28/97 | ||
| State vs. Jimmie Allen
02C01-9509-CR-00286
|
Shelby County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 04/28/97 | |
| State vs. Henry Eugene Hodges
01S01-9505-CR-00080
|
Supreme Court | 04/28/97 | ||
| State vs. Rickey Smith
02C01-9511-CR-00342
|
Shelby County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 04/28/97 | |
| Part Upon State v. Roger Dale Hill, No. 01C01-9508-Cc-00267 (Tenn. Crim. App. June
02C01-9701-CC-00017
|
Lake County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 04/28/97 | |
| Bush vs. State
03S01-9604-CC-00047
|
Cumberland County | Supreme Court | 04/28/97 | |
| State vs. Seals
03C01-9512-CC-00396
|
Roane County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 04/28/97 | |
| X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Court of Appeals | 04/28/97 | ||
| 03S01-9610-CV-00106
03S01-9610-CV-00106
|
Supreme Court | 04/28/97 | ||
| State vs. Jeremiah Leavy
W2001-03031-CCA-R3-PC
A Tipton County jury convicted the Petitioner of first degree murder, felony murder, aggravated robbery, and especially aggravated kidnapping. The trial court merged the two murder convictions and imposed a single life sentence with the possibility of parole. On direct appeal, this Court affirmed the conviction, and the Tennessee Supreme Court denied the Defendant's application for permission to appeal. The Petitioner then sought post-conviction relief in the trial court, alleging that he was denied effective assistance of counsel. Following a hearing, the post-conviction court dismissed the petition. The Petitioner filed a motion to reconsider, which the trial court denied, and the Petitioner appealed. Finding no error, we affirm the trial court's dismissal of the petition.
Authoring Judge: Judge Robert W. Wedemeyer
Originating Judge:Joseph H. Walker, III |
Tipton County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 04/27/97 | |
| David Dean vs. Home Depot USA, Inc.
M1999-02313-COA-R3-CV
Plaintiff, David Dean, was a 68 year old frequent patron of Home Depot. On April 27, 1997, Mr. Dean completed his shopping at the store, paid the cashier and, upon departing, appeared to have set off the electric theft detection alarm. An employee of Home Depot stopped Mr. Dean and asked him to step back into the store while employees located the source of whatever triggered the alarm. Mr. Dean was neither arrested nor charged and ultimately left the store. He brought suit against Home Depot for false imprisonment resulting in a jury verdict in his favor for $37,593.00. On Motion for a New Trial, asking in the alternative for remittitur, the trial court reduced the judgment by $3,000.00. Defendant appealed. Upon consideration of the record, we suggest an increased remittitur and remand the case giving Mr. Dean 15 days to accept the suggested remittitur.
Authoring Judge: Judge William B. Cain
Originating Judge:Carol L. Soloman |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 04/27/97 | |
| Smith, et. al. vs. The Castner-Knott Dry Goods
01A01-9512-CV-00554
Originating Judge:William C. Koch |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 04/25/97 | |
| Wilda G. Mccarty v. Fast Food Merchandisers, et al.
01S01-9510-CH-00186
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance with TENN. CODE ANN. _ 5-6-225(e)(3) for hearing and reporting to the Supreme Court of findings of fact and conclusions of law. The plaintiff sustained a work-related injury to her right arm, and the trial court found she suffered a 33% vocational disability to the right arm as a result of the injury or 16.5% to the body as a whole. See Thompson v. Leon Russell Enterprises, 834 S.W.2d 927 (Tenn. 1992). The plaintiff had been injured in a non-work-related car accident in 1978, and she had injured her back in a work-related accident in January of 1991. The injury to the plaintiff's back resulted in a court-approved workers' compensation award of 36.5% permanent partial disability to the body as a whole. The injury to the plaintiff's right arm, the January 1991 injury to the plaintiff's back and the injury received in the 1978 automobile accident combined resulted in the plaintiff being found permanently and totally disabled. The trial court held under the provisions of T.C.A. _ 5-6-28(a), the plaintiff was to be compensated by the employer for the 16.5% whole body disability as a result of the injury to her arm on July 1991 and by the Second Injury Fund for 83.5% whole body disability. Because of the plaintiff's low rate of pay, the trial court, applying T.C.A. _ 5-6-27(4)(A), found the plaintiff to be entitled to receive payment for 55 weeks rather than 4 weeks, the permanent total disability benefits normally applicable. The trial judge assessed all of this extra 15 weeks to the Second Injury Fund. Our standard of review is de novo on the record, accompanied by the presumption that the trial court's findings of fact are correct, unless the preponderance of the evidence is otherwise. T.C.A. _ 5-6-225(e)(2). Where the issue is one of law, our standard of review is de novo without a presumption of correctness. Bradshaw v. Old Republic Ins. Co., 922 S.W.2d 53, 53 (Tenn. 1996). 2
Authoring Judge: Senior Judge John K. Byers
Originating Judge:Hon. Billy Joe White, |
Fentress County | Workers Compensation Panel | 04/25/97 |