State of Tennessee v. Katius J. Williams
W2013-02542-CCA-R3-CD
The Defendant, Katius J. Williams, was indicted on one count each of aggravated burglary, aggravated rape, and aggravated robbery. See Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 39-13-402, -13-502, -14-403. Following a jury trial, the Defendant was convicted of aggravated burglary, aggravated rape, and the lesser-included offense of theft of property valued at $500 or less. See Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 39-14-103, -105. The trial court sentenced the Defendant as a Range II, multiple offender to an effective forty-year sentence. On appeal, the Defendant contends (1) that the evidence was insufficient to sustain his convictions; (2) that the trial court erred by making “no findings as to why maximum sentences were appropriate”; and (3) that the total effective sentence was excessive. Following our review, we affirm the judgments of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge D. Kelly Thomas
Originating Judge:Judge Russell Lee Moore, Jr. |
Dyer County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 12/30/14 | |
Marcus Terry aka Marcus Benson aka Torian Benson v. State of Tennessee
W2014-00684-CCA-R3-ECN
The pro se petitioner, Marcus Terry aka Marcus Benson aka Torian Benson, appeals the summary dismissal of his petition for writ of error coram nobis, which petition challenged his 1997 Shelby County Criminal Court guilty-pleaded conviction of escape. Discerning no error, we affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge James Curwood Witt Jr.
Originating Judge:Judge Chris Craft |
Shelby County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 12/30/14 | |
Bryan Dewayne Clark v. Jennifer Inez Clark
M2013-02632-COA-R3-CV
This appeal arises from divorced parents’ child custody dispute. After Mother was arrested twice for driving under the influence, Father requested that he be designated as the primary residential parent and that Mother have supervised parenting time only. Without making any specific factual findings, the trial court found that there had been a “substantial and material change in circumstances” since the prior custody order, and the trial court designated Father as the primary residential parent. Mother’s parenting time was decreased by 196 days, her decision-making authoritywas removed, and she was ordered to pay child support to Father. Because the trial court’s order fails to comply with Tennessee Rule of Civil Procedure 52.01, we vacate the trial court’s judgment and remand.
Authoring Judge: Judge W. Neal McBrayer
Originating Judge:Chancellor Tom E. Gray |
Sumner County | Court of Appeals | 12/30/14 | |
State of Tennessee v. Albert Jackson
W2014-00050-CCA-R3-CD
The defendant, Albert Jackson, was convicted by a Shelby County Criminal Court jury of attempted voluntary manslaughter, a Class D felony; aggravated assault, a Class C felony; employing a firearm during the commission of a felony, a Class C felony; reckless endangerment with a deadly weapon, a Class E felony; and felon in possession of a handgun, a Class E felony. He was sentenced to an effective term of twenty-four years in the Tennessee Department of Correction. On appeal, he challenges the sufficiency of the convicting evidence. After review, we affirm the judgments of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Alan E. Glenn
Originating Judge:Judge W. Mark Ward |
Shelby County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 12/30/14 | |
Frederick O. Edwards v. State of Tennessee
W2014-01463-CCA-R3-CO
The Petitioner, Frederick O. Edwards, appeals the Weakley County Circuit Court’s summary dismissal of his motion to correct an illegal sentence pursuant to Tennessee Rule of Criminal Procedure 36.1. The Petitioner contends that the trial court erred by treating his Rule 36.1 motion as a petition for post-conviction relief and further asserts that he has presented a colorable claim for relief. We agree that the trial court’s treatment of the Petitioner’s motion to correct an illegal sentence as a petition for post-conviction relief was error, but because we conclude that the Petitioner has not presented a colorable claim, the trial court’s order denying relief is affirmed.
Authoring Judge: Judge D. Kelly Thomas
Originating Judge:Judge William B. Acree |
Weakley County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 12/30/14 | |
Leon Dickson, Sr. v. Sidney H. Kriger, M.D.
W2013-02830-COA-R3-CV
Patient brought a health care liability action against his eye surgeon, alleging that the surgeon’s negligence in performing a LASIK procedure resulted in several eye injuries. The trial court granted a directed verdict for the surgeon, finding the patient failed to present evidence establishing the standard of care and causation. Because we find the evidence was sufficient to create an issue for the jury, we reverse and remand to the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge W. Neal McBrayer
Originating Judge:Judge James F. Russell |
Shelby County | Court of Appeals | 12/30/14 | |
Metropolitan Government of Nashville, et al. v. Robert W. Donaldson, Jr.
M2013-02605-COA-R3-CV
Defendant appeals a judgment holding that he ran a stop sign, contending that the court did not have subjectmatter or in personam jurisdiction over the matter, and that the Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County lacked standing to bring the action. We affirm the decision of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Richard H. Dinkins
Originating Judge:Judge Hamilton V. Gayden, Jr. |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 12/30/14 | |
State of Tennessee v. Andrew Barry Diebold
W2014-00466-CCA-R3-CD
The defendant, Andrew Barry Diebold, entered pleas of guilty to possession of marijuana with the intent to manufacture, deliver, or sell and possession of drug paraphernalia. He was sentenced, respectively, to two years as a standard offender, to serve ninety days, with one year and nine months of unsupervised probation, and to ninety days at 75%. As a condition of his pleas, he reserved as a certified question if the warrantless search of his backpack by a law enforcement officer was illegal. The search was made by the defendant’s father, who was a lieutenant with the Brownsville Police Department, as the backpack was in the passenger side of the father’s truck, which the defendant had been operating. We conclude that the certified question is not dispositive of the case and, therefore, dismiss the appeal.
Authoring Judge: Judge Alan E. Glenn
Originating Judge:Judge Clayburn Peeples |
Haywood County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 12/30/14 | |
Thomas Fleming Mabry v. Board of Professional Responsibility Of The Supreme Court Of Tennessee
E2013-01549-SC-R3-BP
A hearing panel of the Board of Professional Responsibility determined that an attorney failed to act diligently in his representation of a client and suspended the attorney from the practice of law for forty-five days. The trial court affirmed the suspension. After careful consideration, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Chief Justice Sharon G. Lee
Originating Judge:Judge Don R. Ash |
Knox County | Supreme Court | 12/30/14 | |
Aurora Loan Services, LLC v. Yvette D. Woody, et al.
W2014-00761-COA-R3-CV
In this detainer action, the trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the loan servicing company. Discerning no error, we affirm.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge J. Steven Stafford
Originating Judge:Judge Donna M. Fields |
Shelby County | Court of Appeals | 12/30/14 | |
Chad Seigmund v. Bellsouth Telecommunications, LLC, et al
M2014-00234-SC-R3-WC
In December 2011, Chad Seigmund (“Employee”) was involved in a motor vehicle accident in the course of his employment. His employer, Bellsouth Telecommunications, LLC (“Employer”) provided medical treatment but denied that Employee sustained permanent impairment or disability. Following a trial, the trial court found that Employee had sustained permanent disability and awarded Employee 16.5% permanent partial disability to the body as a whole. Employer has appealed, contending that the evidence preponderates against the permanent disabilityfinding. In accordance with Tennessee Supreme Court Rule 51, the appeal has been referred to the Special Workers’ Compensation Appeals Panel for a hearing and a report of findings of fact and conclusions of law. After a thorough review of the record and the applicable law, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Justice Jeffrey S. Bivins
Originating Judge:Chancellor Vanessa Jackson |
Coffee County | Workers Compensation Panel | 12/30/14 | |
State of Tennessee v. Edward Carter
W2014-00538-CCA-R3-CD
The Defendant-Appellant, Edward Carter, was convicted by a Madison County jury of attempted theft of property valued at more than $500 but less than $1,000, a Class A misdemeanor. The trial court ordered the Defendant to serve 11 months and 29 days in the county jail, suspended to community corrections. The sole issue presented for our review is whether the evidence is sufficient to support the conviction. Upon review, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Camille R. McMullen
Originating Judge:Judge Roy B. Morgan, Jr. |
Madison County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 12/30/14 | |
Aimee Lorraine Howell v. Clint Austin Howell
M2013-02260-COA-R3-CV
In this divorce action, Father appeals the rehabilitative alimony and alimony in solido awarded to Mother, the amount of parenting time he received, the designation of Mother as sole decision-maker and the failure of the trial court to find that Mother was voluntarily underemployed. We affirm the award of rehabilitative alimony and alimony in solido and the designation of Mother as primary residential parent; we vacate and remand for further consideration the residential parenting schedule,the allocation of decision-making authority, and the determination of Mother’s income.
Authoring Judge: Judge Richard H. Dinkins
Originating Judge:Chancellor Tom E. Gray |
Sumner County | Court of Appeals | 12/30/14 | |
Alicia Shane Lovera v. State of Tennessee
W2014-00794-CCA-R3-HC
In 1996, the Petitioner, Alicia Shayne Lovera, was found guilty by a jury of first degree premeditated murder of her husband. On the morning of the sentencing hearing in which the State was seeking a sentence of life without the possibility of parole, the Petitioner agreed to plead guilty to first degree premeditated murder in return for a sentence of life with the possibility of parole. In March 1999, the Petitioner filed a petition for post-conviction relief. Following a hearing, the trial court denied relief, and the Petitioner appealed. This Court affirmed the trial court’s denial of post-conviction relief. On December 19, 2013, the Petitioner filed a writ of habeas corpus alleging the judgment of conviction was void on its face because it was entered upon her plea of guilty after she had been found guilty by a jury. The habeas corpus court dismissed the petition without an evidentiary hearing for failure to state a claim. After a thorough review of the record, we affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge Robert L. Holloway Jr.
Originating Judge:Judge John W. Campbell |
Shelby County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 12/30/14 | |
Dietrich Hill, et al. v. City of Memphis, et al
W2013-02307-COA-R3-CV
This case arises out of an investigation by the Memphis police department of a business suspected of selling illegal inhalants. The business owner was arrested and charged with the criminal sale of inhalants. The police seized bank accounts belonging to the owner and two corporations related to the business and instituted forfeiture proceedings regarding the funds in those accounts. The bank account owner and the two corporations filed suit against the city and multiple police officers seeking damages pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 42 U.S.C. § 1988. The trial court granted the city’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. In denying the plaintiff’s motion to alter or amend, the trial court stated that the amended complaint failed to allege any Fourth or Fifth Amendment violations, the grounds upon which the plaintiffs sought relief. With respect to the only remaining individual defendant, the trial court denied the plaintiffs’ motion to amend the first amended complaint, holding, in part, that the existence of adequate post-deprivation remedies precluded any Fourth or Fifth Amendment claims. We affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge Andy D. Bennett
Originating Judge:Judge Kenny W. Armstrong |
Shelby County | Court of Appeals | 12/30/14 | |
Joseph E. Peek v. Tri-Green Equipment, LLC, et al
M2013-02731-SC-R3-WC
An employee was exposed to a chemical in the course of his employment. He alleged that he developed a disabling pulmonary condition as a result of the exposure. His employer denied that the condition was caused by the exposure. The trial court found for the employee and awarded permanent partial disability and other benefits. The employer has appealed, contending that the evidence preponderates against the finding of causation. The appeal has been referred to the Special Workers’ Compensation Appeals Panel for a hearing and a report of findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Tennessee Supreme Court Rule 51. We affirm the judgment.
Authoring Judge: Senior Judge Paul G. Summers
Originating Judge:Judge John Maddux |
Putnam County | Workers Compensation Panel | 12/30/14 | |
Dennis Turner et al v. City of Bean Station et al
E2013-02630-COA-R9-CV
Dennis Turner was injured while playing softball in a charity tournament at Marvin Rich Field in Bean Station. He sued the City of Bean Station, among other defendants, alleging that the City negligently failed to properly maintain the pitcher’s mound, pitcher’s rubber, and the field as a whole, resulting in his injury. The City moved for summary judgment, arguing that its governmental immunity is not removed by the Governmental Tort Liability Act (GTLA), which removes immunity for “any injury caused by the dangerous or defective condition of any public building, structure, dam, reservoir or other public improvement owned and controlled by [a] governmental entity.” Tenn. Code Ann. § 29-20-204(a)(2012) (emphasis added). The City presented proof establishing that it does not own Marvin Rich Field. The trial court denied the motion but granted permission for an interlocutory appeal. We reverse the trial court’s judgment and grant the City’s motion for summary judgment.
Authoring Judge: Judge Charles D. Susano, Jr.
Originating Judge:Judge Ben W. Hooper, II |
Grainger County | Court of Appeals | 12/30/14 | |
Jeffery Yates v. State of Tennessee and Sharon C. Taylor, Warden
E2014-00163-CCA-R3-HC
The petitioner, Jeffery Yates, appeals the trial court’s denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief. He contends that the court abused its discretion by dismissing his petition without conducting a hearing. He claims that he is entitled to habeas corpus relief because his current sentence is illegal because it was enhanced based upon prior illegal sentences and that the illegal sentences were improperly used to impeach him at trial. After reviewing the record and the applicable law, we affirm the judgment of the trial court pursuant to Rule 20 of the Rules of the Court of Criminal Appeals.
Authoring Judge: Judge John Everett Williams
Originating Judge:Judge Robert E. Cupp |
Johnson County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 12/30/14 | |
In Re: Donald C., et al
M2014-01327-COA-R3-PT
Mother’s parental rights to her children were terminated on grounds of abandonment by failure to visit, persistence of conditions, and noncompliance with a permanency plan. Mother challenged the ground of abandonment, arguing there was a no contact order in place that prevented her from visiting her children. When the no contact order was put into place, Mother was informed she would be able to visit her children if she passed drug tests and took parenting classes. Mother continued to test positive for illegal drugs and failed to take advantage of services offered by the Department of Children’s Services. We affirm the trial court’s judgment that Mother abandoned her children by failing to visit them and that it is in their best interest to terminate her rights. A petition for custody that may have been pending when Mother’s rights were terminated is part of a different proceeding and does not render the court’s decision to terminate Mother’s rights premature.
Authoring Judge: Judge Andy D. Bennett
Originating Judge:Judge A. Andrew Jackson |
Dickson County | Court of Appeals | 12/30/14 | |
State of Tennessee v. Lashay Nicole Scruggs
W2014-00091-CCA-R3-CD
Lashay Nicole Scruggs (“the Defendant”) appeals from the trial court’s denial of judicial diversion. On appeal, the Defendant argues that the trial court abused its discretion by (1) placing heavy emphasis on charges listed as “pending” in the pre-sentence report but that were actually disposed of prior to the sentencing hearing; (2) placing emphasis on the presence of marijuana in the Defendant’s system when marijuana use was not an element of vehicular manslaughter as charged in this case; and (3) placing emphasis on the need to deter others from driving irresponsibly when there was no evidence of such a need in the record. Upon review, we find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion and affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Robert L. Holloway, Jr.
Originating Judge:Judge J. Weber McCraw |
Fayette County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 12/30/14 | |
In Re V.L.J. et al
E2013-02815-COA-R3-PT
This is a parental termination case. It focuses on the three children of a married couple, D.G.B. (Mother) and D.C.B. (Father), and Mother’s child (V.L.J.) from an earlier relationship. The four children came into the custody of the Department of Children’s Services (DCS) in 2009. Nearly four years later, DCS filed a petition to terminate the rights of the parents. Following a trial, the court granted the petition based upon its finding (1) that multiple grounds for termination exist and (2) that termination is in the best interest of the children. Both findings were said by the trial court to be made by clear and convincing evidence. Mother and Father appeal. We affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge Charles D. Susano, Jr.
Originating Judge:Judge Tammy M. Harrington |
Blount County | Court of Appeals | 12/30/14 | |
Glyn Terrance Dale, Sr. v. State of Tennessee
E2014-00552-CCA-R3-PC
The Petitioner, Glyn Terrance Dale, Sr., appeals as of right from the Knox County Criminal Court’s dismissal of his petition for post-conviction relief. The Petitioner contends that his trial counsel was ineffective for introducing into evidence at trial two statements the victim made to an investigator from the Department of Children Services (DCS). Following our review, we affirm the judgment of the post-conviction court.
Authoring Judge: Judge D. Kelly Thomas, Jr.
Originating Judge:Judge Bob R. McGee |
Knox County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 12/29/14 | |
Nicole Goeser, et al v. Live Holdings Corporation, et al
M2013-02501-COA-R3-CV
Defendant in wrongful death action appeals the grant of a default judgment entered against him on the ground that he did not receive a copy of the motion prior to the hearing and, consequently, could not present a defense. Upon consideration of the entire record, we affirm the judgment in all respects.
Authoring Judge: Judge Richard H. Dinkins
Originating Judge:Judge Hamilton V. Gayden, Jr. |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 12/29/14 | |
State of Tennessee v. Leslie Allen Ware, Jr.
E2013-02855-CCA-R3-CD
The defendant, Leslie Allen Ware, Jr., appeals his Sullivan County Criminal Court jury convictions of conspiracy to possess 26 grams or more of cocaine with intent to sell or deliver, possession of 26 grams or more of cocaine for sale or delivery, maintaining a dwelling where controlled substances are used or sold, facilitation of theft, facilitation of conspiracy to commit robbery, and two counts of criminally negligent homicide. The defendant received an effective sentence of 36 years. He claims on appeal that the sentences imposed by the trial court were excessive. Discerning no error, we affirm the judgments of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge James Curwood Witt, Jr.
Originating Judge:Judge R. Jerry Beck |
Sullivan County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 12/29/14 | |
C. Eddie Shoffner v. Tenneseee Consolidated Retirement System
M2014-00070-COA-R3-CV
An individual employed by Claiborne County as Director of Schools was terminated over two years earlier than the employment term set forth in the parties’ contract. The county and the individual entered into another contract (“modified contract”) whereby the individual agreed to work as Safety Coordinator for five months and be compensated in an amount equal to the amount he would have been paid had the prior contract not been terminated. This resulted in a salary increase of nearly $40,000 per month for each of the five months the individual was employed as Safety Coordinator. The modified contract provided that the employee would be paid whether he performed any work or not, and the employee agreed to waive and release any claims he might have against the county. When the employee applied for retirement benefits,the agencyin charge of calculating the amount of benefits did not treat the nearly $40,000 increase in compensation as “earnable compensation” because the additional compensation was not for “services rendered,” as required by the statute. The employee contested this decision, and the administrative law judge (“ALJ”) ruled in favor of the agency, granting the agency’s motion for summary judgment. The employee filed a petition for judicial review, and the trial court affirmed the ALJ’s decision. The employee appeals the trial court’s judgment to this Court, and we affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge Andy D. Bennett
Originating Judge:Chancellor Carol L. McCoy |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 12/29/14 |