Robert Dallis Payne v. State of Tennessee - Order
M2002-01389-CCA-R3-PC
The Appellant, Robert Dallis Payne, appeals the order of the Hickman County Circuit Court summarily dismissing his motion to reopen his petition for post-conviction relief. Upon review of the record before this Court, we conclude that the Appellant has failed to perfect his application for permission to appeal in accordance with the applicable statutory provisions and, therefore, the appeal should be dismissed.
Authoring Judge: Judge David G. Hayes
|
Hickman County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 03/21/03 | |
State of Tennessee v. Christopher G. Greenwood
M2002-01349-CCA-R3-CD
The defendant was convicted of driving under the influence of an intoxicant with a blood alcohol content of .10% or more, third offense. On appeal, he contends: (1) the trial court erred in denying his motion for a mistrial after the jury heard evidence of other crimes committed by the defendant; (2) the trial court erred in barring testimony of the arresting officer that he opined the defendant's blood alcohol content was rising at the time of the blood withdrawal; and (3) the evidence was insufficient to support the conviction because the state presented no evidence extrapolating his .12% test result back to the time he was driving. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Joe G. Riley
Originating Judge:Judge Donald P. Harris |
Williamson County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 03/21/03 | |
In Re: Shiann Horner
E2002-00588-COA-R3-JV
This appeal focuses on the trial court's guardianship decree regarding Shiann Marie Horner (DOB: November 18, 1996) ("the child"). When the child's mother died, she moved in with her father, Charles E. Horner ("the father"), in Greene County. Following the father's incarceration as a result of his second arrest for driving under the influence of an intoxicant ("DUI"), the child started living full-time with her weekend caregivers, Ralph L. Hensley and Diana Hensley ("the Greeneville couple"), a married couple who are not related to the child by blood or marriage. The child's maternal aunt, Lori Lynn Kopsi, a resident of Menominee, Michigan ("the Michigan aunt"), filed a petition seeking custody of the child. The Greeneville couple responded with their own petition for custody. Following a hearing on the competing petitions, the trial court determined that it was in the child's best interest that the Greeneville couple should serve as the child's guardian. The Michigan aunt appeals, challenging the trial court's judgment. We affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge Charles D. Susano, Jr.
Originating Judge:Thomas J. Wright |
Greene County | Court of Appeals | 03/21/03 | |
Gurkin'S Drive-In Market v. Alcohol And Licensing
CH-01-2581-1
Originating Judge:Walter L. Evans |
Shelby County | Court of Appeals | 03/21/03 | |
State v. All Parties with an Interest in the Property /Map 158, Parcel 34
M2002-01137-COA-R3-CV
This is a case involving the proposed disinterment of Indian burial grounds. The Appellants urge this Court to consider numerous issues. Having determined that the only issue properly before this Court is the propriety of the trial court's denial of Appellants' motion to intervene, we affirm the trial court's denial of intervention.
Authoring Judge: Judge David R. Farmer
Originating Judge:Ellen Hobbs Lyle |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 03/20/03 | |
State of Tennessee v. Leon J. Robins and Tabatha R. White
M2001-01862-CCA-R3-CD
The defendants, Leon J. Robins and Tabatha R. White, both were convicted of first degree premeditated murder and sentenced to life imprisonment. In their appeals, they argue that the evidence was insufficient to sustain their convictions for first degree murder; the trial court should have instructed as to the lesser offenses of voluntary manslaughter and facilitation to commit voluntary manslaughter; evidence of a photographic lineup was improperly admitted; and the trial court improperly admitted Robins' mugshots as exhibits and improperly limited the cross-examination of a prosecution witness as to prior bad acts. Based upon our review of the record, we affirm the judgments of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Alan E. Glenn
Originating Judge:Judge Walter C. Kurtz |
Davidson County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 03/20/03 | |
Daniel Bills v. Conseco Insurance
M2002-01906-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Alan E. Highers
Originating Judge:Tom E. Gray |
Sumner County | Court of Appeals | 03/20/03 | |
R.P. Industries v. United States Aluminum
M2002-00897-COA-R3-CV
This appeal arises from a dispute over an agreement to issue joint checks. The trial court found that the parties had an agreement whereby the general contractor was to issue checks jointly payable to the sub-contractor and the materials supplier, which the general contractor breached when it issued single payee checks. The court awarded the materials supplier $17,500.00. The parties raise two issues on appeal. For the following reasons, we affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Alan E. Highers
Originating Judge:Carol L. Soloman |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 03/20/03 | |
James Corbin v. Tom Lange Co.
M2002-01162-COA-R3-CV
This case involves a noncompetition agreement. An employee signed a noncompete agreement when he began working for an employer. The employee resigned and began working for a competitor of the employer. The employee sought a declaratory judgment that the noncompete agreement was unenforceable. Approximately eighteen months into the two-year noncompetition period, the trial court issued a ruling that the agreement was not enforceable. The employer appeals. We affirm, finding that neither the training provided to the employee nor the employee's relationship with the employer's customers created a business interest that warranted the protection of a noncompetition agreement.
Authoring Judge: Judge Holly M. Kirby
Originating Judge:Ellen Hobbs Lyle |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 03/20/03 | |
Daniel Bills v. Conseco Insurance
M2002-01906-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Alan E. Highers
Originating Judge:Tom E. Gray |
Sumner County | Court of Appeals | 03/20/03 | |
Donald Curlee v. State Auto Mutual
M2002-01627-COA-R3-CV
This case involves the interpretation of a permit bond. The contractor and a surety entered into a permit bond relating to work the contractor was to perform for a metropolitan government. The bond was written in favor of the metropolitan government as well as property owners whose property was damaged due to the contractor's violation of certain metropolitan government codes. In the underlying lawsuit, a property owner was awarded a judgment against the contractor. In this lawsuit, the property owner sued the surety for failing to pay the judgment against the contractor. The trial court granted the surety's motion to dismiss, finding that there was no contractual relationship between the property owner and the surety on which a claim could be based, nor was the property owner a third-party beneficiary of the permit bond. The property owner appeals. We review the trial court's decision as a motion for summary judgment and affirm, finding that the record does not show that the property owner was among the parties protected under the language of the Bond.
Authoring Judge: Judge Holly M. Kirby
Originating Judge:Marietta M. Shipley |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 03/20/03 | |
Randall Cook v. Frank Hanner
M2002-01083-COA-R3-CV
Robertson County -This case involves allegations of an improper verdict form and jury instructions. As Appellants failed to make timely objections concerning these issues, and failed to file a motion for a new trial based on these perceived irregularities, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge David R. Farmer
Originating Judge:Ross H. Hicks |
Robertson County | Court of Appeals | 03/20/03 | |
State v. Travis Thompson
M2001-02354-COA-R3-CV
This case involves the Tennessee Health Club Act. The defendant/appellees purchased a health club and failed to obtain a certificate of registration. Three months later, the health club owners obtained a certificate of registration. The State of Tennessee, through the Attorney General, filed a lawsuit against the health club owners alleging violations of the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act and the Health Club Act seeking injunctive relief, substantial fines, and several hundred thousand dollars in restitution. The trial court granted partial summary judgment to the health club owners, holding that the remedies under the Health Club Act were available only to consumers, not the State, and that there was no proof of an "ascertainable loss" under the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act. The trial court also granted the health club owners' request for attorney's fees and costs. The State appeals. We affirm in part and reverse in part, finding, inter alia, that the State may seek remedies under the Health Club Act on behalf of consumers, affirming the trial court's ruling that proof of an ascertainable loss is required, and affirming the award of attorney's fees.
Authoring Judge: Judge Holly M. Kirby
Originating Judge:Ellen Hobbs Lyle |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 03/20/03 | |
Gabriel Bryan Baggett v. State of Tennessee
M2002-00591-CCA-R3-PC
The petitioner, Gabriel Bryan Baggett, pled guilty to second degree murder and especially aggravated robbery, receiving sentences of fifty years and twenty-five years, respectively, at 100%. He filed a petition for post-conviction relief, alleging ineffective assistance of counsel and that his pleas of guilty were involuntary. Following a hearing, the post-conviction court dismissed the petition, and this appeal followed. We affirm the order of the post-conviction court dismissing the petition.
Authoring Judge: Judge Alan E. Glenn
Originating Judge:Judge Steve R. Dozier |
Davidson County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 03/20/03 | |
State of Tennessee v. Jerry Lee Miller, Sr.
E2002-01921-CCA-R3-CD
Jerry Lee Miller, Sr. appeals from the Sullivan County Criminal Court's imposition of incarcerative sentencing for his effective five-year sentence for two counts of statutory rape. Miller pleaded guilty to the offenses as a Range II offender, and the manner of service of the sentence was reserved for the lower court's determination. Miller posits on appeal that he should have been afforded a sentence involving either split confinement or straight probation. We disagree, however, and affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge J. Curwood Witt, Jr.
Originating Judge:Judge Phyllis H. Miller |
Sullivan County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 03/20/03 | |
E2002-01156-COA-R3-CV
E2002-01156-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Alan E. Highers
Originating Judge:Dale C. Workman |
Knox County | Court of Appeals | 03/20/03 | |
State of Tennessee v. Darrell W. Smith
M2002-00735-CCA-R3-CD
The appellant, Darrell W. Smith, pled guilty in the Franklin County Circuit Court to evading arrest and operating a motor vehicle in violation of the Motor Vehicle Habitual Offenders Act, both Class E felonies. The parties agreed that the appellant would be sentenced on each conviction to one year and one day with the sentences to be served consecutively. The manner of service of the sentences was to be determined by the trial court. Following a sentencing hearing, the trial court ordered the appellant to serve 120 days in the county jail, with the balance of the sentences to be served in the community corrections program. On appeal, the appellant challenges the period of confinement. After reviewing the record and the parties' briefs, we affirm the judgments of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Norma McGee Ogle
Originating Judge:Judge J. Curtis Smith |
Franklin County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 03/19/03 | |
State of Tennessee v. Keith Dwayne Guthrie - Order
W2001-01910-CCA-R3-CD
In this appeal the appellant was convicted of theft of property over $500 and sentenced to two (2) years on community corrections. Approximately three (3) months later he was convicted of vandalism of property valued under $500. At the time of his arrest on the vandalism charge the appellant was intoxicated. As a result of his conduct while on community corrections his sentence to this program was revoked. He was re-sentenced to one (1) year of continuous incarceration followed by one (1) year of community corrections.
Authoring Judge: Judge Jerry L. Smith
|
Henry County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 03/19/03 | |
State of Tennessee v. Justin Genel Hill
W2001-01274-CCA-R3-CD
An Obion County grand jury indicted the defendant, Justin Genel Hill, of two counts of first degree murder and one count of conspiracy to commit first degree murder. In a separate indictment, Clarence Carnell Gaston, Miqwon Deon Leach, and Mario Deangelo Thomas were also charged with crimes arising out of the same criminal episode. The defendant and these three men were tried in a single jury trial. The jury found Gaston, Leach, and Thomas guilty of conspiracy to commit first degree murder, second degree murder, and first degree felony murder and found the defendant guilty of facilitation to commit second degree murder. See State v. Clarence Carnell Gaston, No. W2001-02046-CCA-R3-CD, 2003 WL 261941, at *1 (Tenn. Crim. App. at Jackson, Feb. 7, 2003). For the defendant's conviction, the trial court sentenced him to serve a ten-year sentence in the Department of Corrections. The defendant now brings this appeal of his conviction, alleging that the evidence introduced at trial is insufficient to support his conviction. After reviewing the record and applicable law, we find that the defendant's allegation lacks merit and accordingly affirm the defendant's conviction.
Authoring Judge: Judge Jerry L. Smith
Originating Judge:Judge William B. Acree |
Obion County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 03/19/03 | |
Ethan Rider v. Laurie Rider
M2002-00556-COA-R3-CV
This appeal, from a grant of summary judgment, involves the imposition of a constructive trust on life insurance proceeds. The lower court imposed the constructive trust, for the benefit of Father's son from his first marriage, on proceeds distributed to Father's second wife. The basis for the constructive trust arose from Father's obligation, under the decree of divorce dissolving his first marriage, to maintain life insurance benefitting his minor son. For the following reasons, we reverse the ruling of the lower court.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Alan E. Highers
Originating Judge:Russell Heldman |
Williamson County | Court of Appeals | 03/19/03 | |
Jose & Gioconda Matus, et al v. Nashville General Hospital
M2002-01407-COA-R3-CV
This is a medical malpractice case against a municipal hospital pursuant to the Governmental Tort Liability Act. Originally, the defendants included a private physician and two nurse employees of the hospital. Plaintiffs alleged, among other things, that the two nurse employees were partially at fault, and their negligence attributed to the hospital was a cause of the damages alleged. Prior to the trial date, a settlement was reached by the plaintiffs with the private physician and the two nurse employees. Over defendants' objection, plaintiffs were allowed by motion on the eve of trial to amend their complaint to allege that previously un-named nurse employees of the hospital were negligent, which contributed to the damages alleged for which the hospital was responsible. Defendants also filed a motion for summary judgment asserting that, because the two nurse employees were no longer liable and thus their liability could not be attributed to the hospital, the hospital was entitled to summary judgment because there was no allegation of negligence on the part of other employees of the hospital. The trial court granted plaintiffs' motion to amend the complaint and denied the hospital's motion for summary judgment. At the conclusion of a nonjury trial, the hospital was assigned a percentage of fault for the damages incurred, and judgment was entered accordingly. Hospital appeals. We affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge W. Frank Crawford
Originating Judge:Carol L. Soloman |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 03/19/03 | |
Ginger Sweeton v. Angela Orange, et al.
M2002-00211-COA-R3-CV
This is a dispute between two adjoining property owners concerning the location of the common boundary between their respective properties. A survey of the line indicates that the land in question is property of Appellees. Appellant contends that, due to actions taken by her predecessors in interest, she has claim to the property by virtue of adverse possession. The trial court found that the land in question, with the exception of certain buildings used for storage, is the property of Appellees. Appellant appeals. We affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge W. Frank Crawford
Originating Judge:Jeffrey F. Stewart |
Grundy County | Court of Appeals | 03/19/03 | |
Shirley Barlow v. Jarvis Barlow
M1999-00749-COA-R3-CV
These parties were married for twenty-seven years before the wife abandoned the marriage and sought a divorce which was uncontested. She was awarded one-half of the net marital estate, and rehabilitative alimony. Wife appeals, claiming that because of her illness she is entitled to more than 50 percent of the marital property, is entitled to alimony in futuro rather than rehabilitative alimony, and is entitled to attorney fees. We affirm the trial court's judgment, except as to the period of spousal support, which is extended from three years to five years. We also remand this case to the trial court for a determination of whether the post-judgment facts alleged by the husband warrant a further modification of the alimony award.
Authoring Judge: Judge Ben H. Cantrell
Originating Judge:Clara W. Byrd |
Wilson County | Court of Appeals | 03/19/03 | |
State v. Delinquent Taxpayers
M2002-00718-COA-R3-CV
This case involves the question of whether the statutory right of redemption enjoyed by the owner of property sold to recover delinquent taxes may be conveyed to a third party who may then exercise that right and redeem the property. We affirm the decision of the trial court, finding that the statutory right of redemption may be conveyed.
Authoring Judge: Judge David R. Farmer
Originating Judge:Ellen Hobbs Lyle |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 03/19/03 | |
Brian Bacardi v. Bd. of Registration in Podiatry
M2002-00558-COA-R3-CV
This is an appeal from a final order, upholding the validity of a settlement agreement. Appellant, a podiatrist, entered into a settlement agreement with the Tennessee Board of Registration in Podiatry. The settlement agreement contained a provision whereby Appellant voluntarily relinquished his right to reapply for a podiatry license in Tennessee. Upon discovering that loss of the right to apply for license barred participation in all federal health care programs, Appellant sought to have the provision excised from the agreement on the basis that the Board had no statutory authority to mandate a bar on application for a license. The trial court upheld the validity of the settlement agreement. We affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge W. Frank Crawford
Originating Judge:Ellen Hobbs Lyle |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 03/19/03 |