Nickelson vs. Sumner Co. Bd. of Ed.
01A01-9807-CV-00375
Trial Court Judge: Patricia J. Cottrell

Davis vs. Computer Maintenance Svc.
01A01-9809-CV-00459
Trial Court Judge: Walter C. Kurtz

Eldridge vs. Eldridge
01A01-9808-CV-00451
Trial Court Judge: Thomas Goodall

Haywood vs. Haywood
01A01-9808-CH-00442
Trial Court Judge: Patricia J. Cottrell

Jo Ann Forman, Inc. et al vs. Nat'l Council on Compensation
01A01-9805-CH-00260
Trial Court Judge: Thomas A. Greer, Jr.

Opryland Hotel vs. Millbrook Distribution Svcs.
01A01-9810-CH-00551
Trial Court Judge: Carol L. Mccoy

Drake vs. Manson, et al
01A01-9810-CV-00525
Trial Court Judge: Bobby H. Capers

01A01-9809-CH-00504
01A01-9809-CH-00504
Trial Court Judge: Carol L. Mccoy

Cumberland Bend Investors vs. Ambrose Printing
01A01-9810-CH-00543
Trial Court Judge: Irvin H. Kilcrease, Jr.

Turner vs. Campbell
01A01-9903-CH-00139
Trial Court Judge: Stella L. Hargrove

Taylor vs. Campbell
01A01-9812-CH-00638
Trial Court Judge: Carol L. Mccoy

State vs. Glen Porter
03C01-9808-CR-00294

State vs. James Gilbert
03C01-9808-CC-00303
Trial Court Judge: Rex Henry Ogle

State vs. Harold Dufour
03C01-9902-CR-00063
Trial Court Judge: James Curwood Witt

State vs. Teresa Everett
E1999-02647-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Jerry Smith
Trial Court Judge: E. Eugene Eblen
Following a trial on September 28, 1998, a Loudon County jury convicted Teresa Everett, the defendant and appellant, of attempt to commit second-degree murder. The trial court subsequently sentenced her to serve fifteen (15) years in the Tennessee Department of Corrections. The defendant presents the following issues on appeal (1) Whether the evidence was sufficient to convict her; (2)Whether the trial court erred by allowing improper impeachment; (3) Whether the trial court erred by allowing a lay-witness to testify to his opinion; (4) Whether the trial court erred by allowing the state to introduce character evidence; (5) Whether the state's closing arguments were improper; and (6) Whether the defendant should be granted a new trial based on newly discovered evidence. Although the evidence is sufficient to support the verdict, we find the cumulative effect of all the remaining errors deprived the defendant of a fair trial. Accordingly, we reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand the case for a new trial.

State vs. Dennis Wade Suttles
03C01-9801-CR-00036

Alfonzo T. Peck vs. State
03C01-9809-CR-00329
Trial Court Judge: Douglas A. Meyer

Rocky Hipps vs. State
03C01-9807-CC-00237
Trial Court Judge: D. Kelly Thomas, Jr.

State vs. Timothy V. Bowling
03C01-9805-CR-00167
Trial Court Judge: Lynn W. Brown

State vs. James David Shropshire
E1998-00872-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Jerry Smith
Trial Court Judge: Richard R. Baumgartner
In March 1996, James David Shropshire, the defendant and appellant, was convicted in the Knox County Criminal Court of aggravated sexual battery and simple assault. Following the jury's verdict, the trial court dismissed the simple assault charge. On appeal, the defendant challenges his conviction for aggravated sexual battery. He raises the following issues: (1) whether the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction; (2) whether a variance between the bill of particulars and the proof adduced at trial was fatal; (3) whether the defendant's conviction violated the double jeopardy clauses of the United States and Tennessee Constitutions; (4) whether the state made improper closing arguments; and (5) whether the trial court erred in allowing the state to introduce evidence that the defendant had committed prior bad acts. Because the jury heard evidence that the defendant committed a crime other than that for which he was on trial, which was the subject of an acquittal, the judgment of the trial court is reversed.

Emma Crowe v. Diocese of Memphis Housing Corp
02S01-9807-CH-00071
Authoring Judge: John K. Byers, Senior Judge
Trial Court Judge: Hon. J. Steven Stafford,
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance with Tenn. Code Ann. _ 5-6-225(e)(3) for hearing and reporting to the Supreme Court of findings of fact and conclusions of law. Plaintiff filed a complaint for workers' compensation benefits on October 7, 1996, alleging severe psychological and emotional injury, or aggravation of same, arising out of her conditions at work. The trial court found that the statute of limitations had run on the plaintiff's claim prior to the filing of her complaint and dismissed the complaint. The court also made findings, for the record, that the plaintiff gave proper notice and that the plaintiff had failed to meet her burden of proving causation of a compensable injury. We affirm the judgment of the trial court dismissing plaintiff's complaint for the reasons herein stated.

State vs. Cedron Orgain
01C01-9808-CC-00334
Trial Court Judge: Robert W. Wedemeyer

State vs. Lane
03S01-9802-CC-00013
Trial Court Judge: R. Steven Bebb

Doe vs. Sundquist
01S01-9901-CV-00006

State vs. Bruce Edward Rochefort
01C01-9902-CR-00029