Tennessee Administrative Office of the Courts

COURT

County

Authoring Judge

Originating Judge

Date Filter

Case Number

Case Name

Keyword Search

Sort by

Order

Pait vs. City of Gatlinburg 03A01-9808-CH-00274		Court of Appeals	05/21/99
Harjes vs. Russell 03A01-9810-CH-00321	Hamilton	Court of Appeals	05/21/99
Debyl vs. Graham 03A01-9901-GS-00015		Court of Appeals	05/21/99
Creswell vs. Creswell 03A01-9804-CH-00151		Court of Appeals	05/21/99
Harvey vs. Ford Motor Credit 03A01-9807-CV-00235		Court of Appeals	05/21/99
) Hon. F Rank v. Will Iams, Iii 03101-9807-CH-00239		Court of Appeals	05/21/99
Haynes vs. Harris 01A01-9810-CV-00518	Hickman	Court of Appeals	05/21/99
Ausbrooks vs. Ausbrooks 01A01-9803-CH-00114 Trial Court Judge: Henry Denmark Bell	Williamson	Court of Appeals	05/21/99
Winfree vs. Winfree 01A01-9805-CH-00264 Trial Court Judge: Charles D. Haston, Sr.	Warren	Court of Appeals	05/21/99
Farrar vs. Segroves 01A01-9808-CH-00443 Trial Court Judge: Tyrus H. Cobb	Bedford	Court of Appeals	05/21/99
State vs. Frankie Lee Lunsford 03C01-9804-CR-00152 Trial Court Judge: R. Jerry Beck	Sullivan	Court of Criminal Appeals	05/21/99
State vs. Richard M. & Edith L. Parrott 03C01-9709-CR-00408 Trial Court Judge: Edgar P. Calhoun	Sullivan	Court of Criminal Appeals	05/21/99
Carden v. Roane Co. 03S01-9712-CH-00151 Authoring Judge: William H. Inman, Senior Judge Trial Court Judge: Hon. Frank V. Williams, III, This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance with Tenn. Code Ann. _ 5-6-225(e)(3) for hearing and reporting to the Supreme Court of findings of fact and conclusions of law. The plaintiff was injured in July 1993 while driving a truck during the course and within the scope of his job. The occurrence of the accident is not questioned; neither does the defendant question that the plaintiff suffered a back injury as a result of the accident. The plaintiff continued his employment with intermittent medical treatment for his back complaints. On September 1, 1995, at his residence, he stooped to pick up an object and suffered another onset of pain. The complaint was filed November 2, 1995, alleging the occurrence of the traffic accident (as a result of which periodic payments of compensation were made to the plaintiff through November 15, 1995), and subsequent physical impairment. The thrust of the defense is directed to the incident of September 3, 1995, when the plaintiff allegedly suffered the non-job-related accident at home, from which his present impairment is derived. The Chancellor found a 4 percent impairment, holding that the incident at his residence was not an intervening cause, but was merely a manifestation of problems which began in 1993. The issue is whether the evidence preponderates against the finding of the Chancellor.1 1The appellant states that the Chancellor found that "the injury sustained by the plaintiff while working at home in 1995 was causally related to a work-related injury the plaintiff had suffered two years previously." As observed, the Chancellor referred to the September 1995 event as a non-intervening incident which was merely a natural progression of the plaintiff's back problems. 2	Knox	Workers Compensation Panel	05/20/99
State vs. Robert Crisp 02C01-9810-CC-00311 Trial Court Judge: Jon Kerry Blackwood	Hardeman	Court of Criminal Appeals	05/20/99
State vs. Ronald McCray 02C01-9809-CC-00292	Fayette	Court of Criminal Appeals	05/20/99
State vs. Brian Faulkens 02C01-9809-CR-00283 Trial Court Judge: Carolyn Wade Blackett	Shelby	Court of Criminal Appeals	05/20/99
State vs. Chris Eugene Etters 03C01-9801-CC-00034 Trial Court Judge: Phyllis H. Miller	Sullivan	Court of Criminal Appeals	05/20/99
State vs. Thomas Lewis 02C01-9707-CR-00254 Trial Court Judge: Joseph B. Dailey	Shelby	Court of Criminal Appeals	05/20/99
State vs. Eddie Pittman W2000-01582-CCA-R3-CD Authoring Judge: Judge Joe G. Riley Trial Court Judge: Roger A. Page The defendant appeals his convictions for attempted second degree murder and felony possession of a weapon, arguing that he was denied his right to a unanimous jury verdict by the trial court's failure to require the prosecution to make an election of facts supporting the attempted murder. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that neither an election nor enhanced unanimity instruction was required. Thus, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.	Madison	Court of Criminal Appeals	05/20/99
Seymour Hayes, III. vs. State 03C01-9902-CR-00066	Hamilton	Court of Criminal Appeals	05/20/99
Lee P. Fite, Individually and Derivatively on behalf of H & M Construction Co., Inc. v. Richard L. Fite, C. David Fite, Larry P. Becker, et al 02A01-9710-CH-00266 Authoring Judge: Judge Holly Kirby Lillard Trial Court Judge: Chancellor Joe C. Morris This case involves allegations of breach of fiduciary duty, fraud in the inducement of a contract, and violation of the Tennessee Securities Act. The plaintiff asserts that the defendants, his two brothers who are majority shareholders in the family corporation, the corporation, as an alter ego or veil of the majority shareholders, and an officer and director of the corporation, used fraudulent expense and contract-kickback schemes to lower the book value of the corporation’s stock when plaintiff executed an option to sell agreement. The trial court granted summary judgment to the defendants. We reverse and remand.	Madison	Court of Appeals	05/19/99
Atty. Gen. vs. Elk View Land & Gravel 03A01-9808-CV-00247		Court of Appeals	05/19/99
Bethany Christian Services vs. Jackson 03A01-9810-JV-00345		Court of Appeals	05/19/99
Bobby Allen Joyner vs. State 03C01-9807-CR-00260 Trial Court Judge: Lynn W. Brown	Sullivan	Court of Criminal Appeals	05/19/99
Jonathan Stephenson vs. State 03C01-9807-CR-00255 Trial Court Judge: Lynn W. Brown	Johnson	Court of Criminal Appeals	05/19/99