Little Six Corporation vs. Ruth Johnson, Commissioner
01A01-9806-CH-00285
Trial Court Judge: Carol L. Mccoy

Buford vs. Cunningham
01A01-9806-CH-00325
Trial Court Judge: Irvin H. Kilcrease, Jr.

Advanced Sales vs. Wilson Co.
01A01-9805-CH-00245
Trial Court Judge: C. K. Smith

State vs. Lowell Clayton Gredig, Jr.
03C01-9801-CC-00017
Trial Court Judge: D. Kelly Thomas, Jr.

David A. Roettger v. Metro Government of Nashville & Davidson County, et al
01S01-9805-CH-00089
Authoring Judge: Per Curiam
Trial Court Judge: Hon. Carol L. Mccoy

Jenny C. Walker vs. James M. Walker
M2001-00087-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Ben H. Cantrell
Trial Court Judge: Carol A. Catalano
After the parties separated, the husband borrowed a substantial amount of money to complete the renovation of marital property and to pay household expenses. The trial court divided the marital property pursuant to divorce, classifying the husband's post-separation loans as marital debt. The wife argues on appeal that the trial court erred in its classification and division of the post-separation debts. We affirm the trial court.

State vs. Joel Guilds
01C01-9804-CC-00182

State vs. Stanley Abell
02C01-9805-CR-00129
Trial Court Judge: W. Fred Axley

State vs. Stanley Abell
02C01-9805-CR-00129
Trial Court Judge: W. Fred Axley

State vs. Charles Bledsoe
02C01-9809-CC-00269

Southers vs. Southers
03A01-9802-CV-00001

Mark S. Miller vs. State
03C01-9803-CR-00108

Cox v. Hartford Accident
03S01-9706-CH-00063
Authoring Judge: John K. Byers, Senior Judge
Trial Court Judge: Hon. Billy Joe White,
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance with Tenn. Code Ann. _ 5-6-225(e)(3) for hearing and reporting to the Supreme Court of findings of fact and conclusions of law. After conducting two separate hearings on this case, the trial court found that the plaintiff was totally and permanently disabled. The trial court further held that the insurance carrier would be liable for 75 percent of the plaintiff's disability and the Second Injury Fund would be liable for 25 percent of the plaintiff's disability. The Second Injury Fund presents the following issues for our review: I. Whether obesity is a compensable preexisting permanent physical disability to warrant recovery from the Second Injury Fund under Tenn. Code Ann. _ 5-6-28(a). II. Whether the trial [court] erred in holding the Fund liable for 25% of the award. We reverse the judgment of the trial court holding the Second Injury Fund liable and dismiss the Second Injury Fund from this case. BACKGROUND ON THE FIRST HEARING At the time of the first hearing on June 14, 1994, the plaintiff was 33 years of age, stood over six feet tall, and weighed close to 4 pounds. He testified that most of his family is overweight and that he has always been a large person. The plaintiff's wife testified that her husband has lost some weight in the past but that he has always been heavy. After graduating from high school, the plaintiff's employment history included working as a small engine repairman, heavy equipment operator, carpenter, factory worker, meat processor, sewing machine operator, and tire builder. The plaintiff eventually returned to school and obtained an associate's degree in accounting from Draughon's College. Draughon's College placed the plaintiff with Monday Realty, where he worked over four years as a bookkeeper three days a week and as a maintenance worker two days a week. When the plaintiff was hired by Monday Realty, he weighed approximately 31 pounds. He testified that he had some normal limitations due to his weight and that his employer made accommodations for him in that respect. For example, the plaintiff did not have to do any roofing work or crawl under houses. 2

STS/BAC Joint Venture v. The City of Mt. Juliet
M2003-00171-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Patricia J. Cottrell
Trial Court Judge: Charles K. Smith
The developer of a planned Wilson County subdivision sought damages for a temporary taking, claiming that the City of Mt. Juliet interfered with the completion of the project by arbitrarily refusing to grant necessary permits. The trial court granted summary judgment to Mt. Juliet, in part on the ground that the statute of limitations had passed on the developer's claim for relief. We affirm.

State vs. Ronnie Garner
01C01-9806-CC-00258

State vs. Billy Brown
02C01-9805-CR-00157

Amy Decker vs. Carroll Academy
02A01-9709-CV-00242
Trial Court Judge: Julian P. Guinn

State vs. Lewis L. Bell a/k/a Lewis Coleman a/k/a Lewis Ingram
01C01-9807-CR-00279

Tabor vs. Eakin
03A01-9902-CV-00043

Hennigan vs. Hennigan
01A01-9807-CH-00380
Trial Court Judge: Tyrus H. Cobb

In the Matter of: M.C.G.
01A01-9809-JV-00461
Trial Court Judge: Andrew J. Shookhoff

James Harold Register vs. State
01C01-9605-CC-00199

James E. Kenner vs. State
01C01-9709-CR-00424
Trial Court Judge: J. Randall Wyatt, Jr.

C&C Aluminum Builders Supply vs. Rynd
01A01-9804-CH-00225
Trial Court Judge: John W. Rollins

Lessley vs. Shope
01A01-9805-CV-00233
Trial Court Judge: Carol A. Catalano