Special Judge Hamilton v. Gayden, Jr.
01S01-9705-CV-00106
Authoring Judge: John K. Byers, Senior Judge
Trial Court Judge: Hon. John Maddux,
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance with Tenn. Code Ann. _ 5-6-225(e)(3) for hearing and reporting to the Supreme Court of findings of fact and conclusions of law. The plaintiff injured his back on June 3, 1995 while in the course of his employment with the defendant. The trial judge found the plaintiff had sustained a 55 percent vocational impairment to the body as a whole. The defendant says the medical evidence submitted at trial was insufficient to show the plaintiff sustained a permanent injury and further says the award was excessive even if the plaintiff sustained permanent injury. The judgment of the trial judge is affirmed. Because there is no contest about the accident which injured the plaintiff, we need not discuss the facts thereof. MEDICAL EVIDENCE The only medical evidence in this case was the testimony of Dr. S. M. Smith, an orthopaedic surgeon. Dr. Smith first saw the plaintiff on August 31, 1995. He testified concerning his examination of the plaintiff and detailed specific findings, not necessary to set out, concerning the injury. When asked his opinion about the plaintiff's injury on the date of August 31, 1995, Dr. Smith said: I felt that he needed an MRI of his lumbar spine, along with an EMG and a nerve conduction study of both lower extremities to fully evaluate the back problem. I also felt that he may need a course of physical activity and possible surgical intervention based upon the findings of the MRI. And at that time, I didn't think I could give him an impairment rating, because his condition had not been fully evaluated.1 Dr. Smith saw the plaintiff on April 3, 1996 and again examined him. When asked about his condition at that time, Dr. Smith said: He continues to have problems with his back. His examination was completely unchanged. And I told him that since we cannot get any studies done, that I would go ahead and rate him based on the physical findings that he has now. And he has enough physical findings to make me think that he has nerve root impingement in the lumbar region. I think that he deserves an MRI to help better elucidate this problem. I would not feel comfortable sending him to PT without an MRI, because if he does have a ruptured disc, then this could make his condition worse. 1 The defendant would not pay for an MRI or EMG because they did not recognize the plaintiff's injury as compensable. The plaintiff could not afford the cost of the tests. 2

Anne Crossett v. Babcock Industries, Inc., et al.
01S01-9701-CV-00001
Authoring Judge: William S. Russell, Retired Judge
Trial Court Judge: Hon.

E.L. Reid vs. Don Sunquist, et al
02C01-9610-CC-00327

State vs. Dewayne Moore
02C01-9705-CC-00167

State vs. Robert Dyer
02C01-9612-CC-00443

State vs. Quentin Lewis
02C01-9702-CR-00052

State vs. Brian Lautenschlager
02C01-9702-CC-00051

State vs. Ronald Cass
02C01-9612-CC-00489
Trial Court Judge: C. Creed Mcginley

Riley vs. State
03C01-9705-CR-00181
Trial Court Judge: E. Eugene Eblen

03C01-9610-CR-00407
03C01-9610-CR-00407
Trial Court Judge: Mayo L. Mashburn

State vs. Jason Pickens
02C01-9612-CC-00486

State vs. George Woods
02C01-9701-CC-00037

State vs. Nicole Gray
02C01-9612-CR-00442

State vs. Cynthia & Rhodney Roberson
02C01-9702-CC-00083
Trial Court Judge: Dick Jerman, Jr.

Schering Healthcare vs. St. Bd. Equalization
02A01-9703-CH-00058
Trial Court Judge: Floyd Peete, Jr.

State vs. Maurice Manley
02C01-9612-CC-00482
Trial Court Judge: John Franklin Murchison

State vs. William Bogus
02C01-9506-CC-00169
Trial Court Judge: Joe G. Riley. Jr.

03C01-9607-CR-00269
03C01-9607-CR-00269

Thompson vs. State
03C01-9611-CR-00395
Trial Court Judge: Lynn W. Brown

James Dollar v. Florida Steel Corporation
02S01-9608-CH-00071
Authoring Judge: William S. Russell, Retired Judge
Trial Court Judge: Ash, Judge

State vs. Bobbie Weathers
02C01-9703-CC-00123
Trial Court Judge: John Franklin Murchison

State vs. Robert Glen Coe
02C01-9606-CR-00200

State vs. Wilbur Kerney
02C01-9608-CC-00264
Trial Court Judge: William B. Acree

Wilson vs. Wilson
03A01-9708-CV-00324

Hicks vs. Hicks
03A01-9708-CV-00359