| Stephen Benker V.Williams Telecommunications Service, Inc., et al.
E1999-01967-WC-R3-CV
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance with Tenn. Code Ann. _ 5-6- 225(e)(3) for hearing and reporting to the Supreme Court of findings of fact and conclusions of law. The employer has appealed from the trial court's ruling the employee is totally disabled raising issues concerning compensability of the claim and the apportionment of the award. Judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Tenn. Code Ann. _ 5-6-225(e) (1999) Appeal as of Right; Judgment of the Circuit Court is Affirmed. THAYER, SP. J., in which ANDERSON, C. J. and BYERS, SR. J., joined. Robert W. Knolton, of Oak Ridge, Tennessee, for the Appellants, William Telecommunications Service, Inc. and Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania. Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter, and E. Blaine Sprouse, Assistant Attorney General, of Nashville, Tennessee, for the Appellee, State Second Injury Fund. J. Anthony Farmer, of Knoxville, Tennessee, for the Appellee, Stephen Benker. OPINION The employer, Williams Telecommunications Service, Inc., and the Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania, have appealed from the trial court's ruling finding the employee, Stephen Benker, to be totally disabled. Facts Employee Benker was 51 years of age and was a high school graduate with some vocational training. His prior work history was a laborer, maintenance worker, construction worker and carpenter. He was employed as a telephone computer service system installer on September 23, 1997, when he tripped on some phone cords and fell. When this occurred, he testified he twisted his back, felt sharp pain down his leg and some numbness in his low back. Prior to this accident, he had disc surgery in 1975 or 1976 and returned to work. In 199 he had another disc operation and returned to work. He had complaints from back problems for several years prior to the incident in question and had missed work at different times between 199 and the accident in 1997. He has not worked since the September 23rd incident and states he is not able to work at any of the jobs he has held. His wife, Lisa Benker, testified as to his physical limitations and testified that she does everything both inside and outside their home and that "our entire life has changed, everything is different." Dr. John T. Purvis, a neurosurgeon, performed the second surgery in 199 which involved a ruptured disc. He saw the employee again after the incident in question and stated that he had severe osteoarthritis in his low back and with his prior historyof having disc surgery twice, he would be very sensitive to any type of injury to the back. He concluded that Benker sustained an aggravation and acceleration of his lumbar spondylosis to such an extent that he was unable to work; that there was some anatomical change and he was surprised that he had worked as long as he did. He gave impairments of 1 percent due to the 1976 surgery, 15 percent due to the 199 surgery and 1 percent due to the September 1997 accident. Opposing this medical testimony was the written medical report of Dr. Archer Bishop. He performed an independent medical examination on November 1, 1998 and was of the opinion the accident had only increased his pain and that there was no additional impairment. Witness, Julian Nadolsky, a vocational consultant, testified the employee had "no capacity to earn a living in any occupation" based on the opinion of Dr. Purvis. He admitted that there would be no vocational disability under Dr. Bishop's conclusion. The trial court found the accident of September 23, 1997 rendered the employee totally disabled and apportioned the award of permanent total disability pursuant to subsection (a)(1) of Tenn. Code Ann. _ 5-6-28. The court ordered the employer to pay 6 percent of the award and the state second injury fund to pay the remaining 4 percent. Issues on Appeal The employer and insurance company contend: (1) the accident in question did not cause any anatomical change in the employee's pre-existing condition, (2) the employee was not totally disabled as a result of the last accident and (3) the court was in error in apportioning a greater portion -2-
Authoring Judge: Thayer, Sp. J.
Originating Judge:Ben W. Hooper II, Circuit Judge |
Knox County | Workers Compensation Panel | 11/27/00 | |
| Elpidio Placencia vs. Lauren Placencia
W1999-01812-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge W. Frank Crawford
Originating Judge:George H. Brown |
Shelby County | Court of Appeals | 11/27/00 | |
| State vs. Johnnie Bell, Jr.
E1999-00819-CCA-R9-CD
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Joseph M. Tipton
Originating Judge:Phyllis H. Miller |
Sullivan County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 11/27/00 | |
| Mary Slack vs. Bryan Antwine
W2000-00961-COA-R3-CV
Plaintiffs sued to quiet title to property and to establish boundary line. The trial court found that the deed description of plaintiffs' property established their title to the disputed property. Defendant has appealed. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge W. Frank Crawford
Originating Judge:Joe C. Morris |
Henderson County | Court of Appeals | 11/27/00 | |
| Elpidio Placencia vs. Lauren Placencia
W1999-01812-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge W. Frank Crawford
Originating Judge:George H. Brown |
Shelby County | Court of Appeals | 11/27/00 | |
| State vs. Johnnie Bell, Jr.
E1999-00819-CCA-R9-CD
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Joseph M. Tipton
Originating Judge:Phyllis H. Miller |
Sullivan County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 11/27/00 | |
| Elpidio Placencia vs. Lauren Placencia
W1999-01812-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge W. Frank Crawford
Originating Judge:George H. Brown |
Shelby County | Court of Appeals | 11/27/00 | |
| Harry Tusant vs. City of Memphis
W2000-01431-COA-R3-CV
Petitioners, Memphis police officers, filed a petition in chancery court for writ of mandamus to require the city to promote them to certain civil service ranks after they successfully completed the promotional process and are otherwise eligible and qualified for promotion. The trial court denied the petition, and petitioners have appealed.
Authoring Judge: Judge W. Frank Crawford
Originating Judge:Floyd Peete, Jr. |
Shelby County | Court of Appeals | 11/27/00 | |
| Estate of Annie Hamilton et al. v. Walter Morris,et al.
W1998-00191-COA-R3-CV
Proponents of 1992 will of testatrix offered the will for probate, and three beneficiaries of testatrix's 1987 will filed a complaint contesting the 1992 will. Proponents of the 1992 will filed a response to the complaint contesting the 1992 will which, inter alia, denies that the 1987 will is the last will and testament of the testatrix. The chancellor granted summary judgment against the proponents of the 1992 will, holding that the will was void by virtue of proponents' undue influence on testatrix. The chancellor also granted summary judgment for residuary beneficiary of the 1987 will and admitted the 1987 will to probate as the last will and testament of the testatrix. Appellants, the proponents of the 1992 will and contestants of the 1987 will, have appealed.
Authoring Judge: Judge W. Frank Crawford
Originating Judge:J. Steven Stafford |
Dyer County | Court of Appeals | 11/27/00 | |
| David Roberts vs. Essex Microtel Assoc.,et al
E2000-01356-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge David Michael Swiney
Originating Judge:Richard E. Ladd |
Sullivan County | Court of Appeals | 11/27/00 | |
| State vs. Danny Harold Ogle
E2000-00421-CCA-R3-CD
Defendant entered a best interest plea of guilty to vehicular homicide by recklessness. The plea attempted to reserve a certified question of law relating to the destruction of evidence; namely, the victim's vehicle. Specifically, defendant contends the destruction of the vehicle while it was under state control deprived him of due process, and the trial court should have dismissed the indictment. Upon our review of the record, we conclude that we have no jurisdiction to address the certified question. The appeal is dismissed.
Authoring Judge: Judge Joe G. Riley
|
Sevier County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 11/22/00 | |
| State of Tennessee v. Harold L. Green
E2000-00616-CCA-R10-CD
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Joseph M. Tipton
Originating Judge:James B. Scott, Jr. |
Anderson County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 11/22/00 | |
| State vs. Jason Beeler
W1999-01417-CCA-R3-CD
The defendant appeals from jury trial convictions for reckless homicide, felony murder, aggravated burglary, and two counts of especially aggravated kidnapping. In this appeal, the defendant alleges insufficient evidence, errors in admitting certain evidence, prosecutorial misconduct, improper instructions, and error in denying his writ of error coram nobis. Concluding that it was reversible error to not instruct on the lesser-included offenses of felony murder, we remand for a new trial on the felony murder count. We affirm the remaining convictions.
Authoring Judge: Judge J. Curwood Witt, Jr.
Originating Judge:William B. Acree |
Obion County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 11/22/00 | |
| State vs. Deborah Graham & Denice Smith
E1999-02248-CCA-R3-CD
After a jury trial, a Cocke County jury found the Defendants, Deborah Graham and Denice Smith, guilty of the first degree murder of Aaron Smith. Following a sentencing hearing, the trial court sentenced both Defendants to life imprisonment with the possibility of parole. In this appeal as of right, the Defendants raise the following issues: 1) whether the trial court erred in not dismissing the indictments because of the State's failure to provide the Defendants with a speedy trial; 2) whether the trial court erred by allowing the State to decide not to consolidate Alexandro Rivera's case with the Defendants' case, because of a potential Bruton problem, without first granting the Defendants an opportunity to be heard on the issue; 3) whether the trial court erred in failing to sever Defendant Smith's case from Defendant Graham's case; 4) whether the trial court erred in consolidating Defendant Graham's case with Defendant Smith's case; and 5) whether the evidence was sufficient to convict each of the Defendants of first degree murder. After a thorough review of the evidence and the applicable law, we affirm the decision of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Thomas T. Woodall
Originating Judge:Rex H. Ogle |
Cocke County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 11/22/00 | |
| State s. Ricky Eugene Cofer
E2000-00532-CCA-R3-CD
Defendant was indicted for aggravated robbery, and a Roane County jury found him guilty of the lesser offense of simple robbery, a Class C felony. The trial court sentenced him to six years as a Range II, multiple offender, to be served consecutively to a prior Anderson County sentence. In this appeal, defendant makes the following allegations: (1) the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction; (2) the jury foreman impermissibly interjected extraneous information into the jury deliberations; and (3) consecutive sentences were not warranted. Upon our review of the record, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Joe G. Riley
Originating Judge:E. Eugene Eblen |
Roane County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 11/22/00 | |
| Tinkham vs. Beasley
M1999-02809-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Patricia J. Cottrell
Originating Judge:Clara W. Byrd |
Wilson County | Court of Appeals | 11/22/00 | |
| White vs. Revco Discount Drug Centers, Inc.
E1999-02023-SC-R11-CV
We granted permission to appeal in this case to address whether a private employer may be held liable for the negligent actions of an off-duty police officer who was hired by the employer for private security purposes. In the circuit court, the defendant employer moved to dismiss the plaintiffs' wrongful death action for failure to state a claim, and the motion was granted by the trial judge. The Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal, holding that the actions of the off-duty officer were taken in furtherance of his official duties as a peace officer, and therefore, the defendant employer could not be held liable for the officer's negligent actions. After reviewing the complaint in this case, along with the applicable legal authority, we hold that the complaint does state a claim against the defendant employer for the negligence of the off-duty officer. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed, and the case is remanded to the Knox County Circuit Court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Authoring Judge: Justice William M. Barker
Originating Judge:Dale C. Workman |
Knox County | Supreme Court | 11/22/00 | |
| State vs. Garrison
E1997-00045-SC-R11-CD
The defendant, John C. Garrison, was convicted by a jury of solicitation to commit first degree murder. In this appeal, he raises two issues: (1) whether trial counsel's failure to communicate a plea bargain offer from the State is per se prejudicial to the extent necessary to satisfy the prejudice prong of Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S. Ct. 2052, 80 L. Ed. 2d 674 (1984); and (2) whether the trial court committed reversible error when it failed to instruct the jury that the "request," as used in the statutory definition of the offense of solicitation, must be intentional. After a thorough consideration of the record and a full review of the authorities, we conclude that trial counsel's failure to communicate a plea bargain offer does not demonstrate, alone, prejudice sufficient to satisfy the second prong of Strickland. We conclude also that the trial court's omission of certain required language from the jury instruction constitutes harmless error. The judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals is, therefore, reversed and the case is dismissed.
Authoring Judge: Justice Adolpho A. Birch, Jr.
Originating Judge:Thomas W. Graham |
Bledsoe County | Supreme Court | 11/22/00 | |
| Darrick Edwards vs. State
E1999-01204-CCA-R3-PC
The petitioner, Darrick Edwards, appeals the trial court's denial of his petition for post-conviction relief. Because the petitioner was provided the effective assistance of counsel and knowingly and voluntarily entered his pleas of guilt to first degree murder, conspiracy to commit first degree murder, aggravated robbery, and conspiracy to commit aggravated robbery, the judgment is affirmed.
Authoring Judge: Judge Gary R Wade
Originating Judge:Douglas A. Meyer |
Hamilton County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 11/22/00 | |
| Martino vs. Dyer
M1999-02397-COA-R3-CV
The trial court granted the motion of an attorney seeking collection of a pro rata share of his fee from a hospital lien against his client's settlement. The effect of the trial court's order is to require the hospital to pay fees to an attorney it did not hire. We reverse the judgment.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Patricia J. Cottrell
Originating Judge:William M. Dender |
Sumner County | Court of Appeals | 11/22/00 | |
| Tinkham vs. Beasley
M1999-02809-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Patricia J. Cottrell
Originating Judge:Clara W. Byrd |
Wilson County | Court of Appeals | 11/22/00 | |
| State of Tennessee v. Spike William Hedgecoth
E2000-00051-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Thomas T. Woodall
Originating Judge:Lillie Ann Sells |
Cumberland County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 11/22/00 | |
| Alvin Vonner vs. State
M2000-00566-CCA-R3-CD
The petitioner, Alvin Vonner, appeals the Hickman County Circuit Court's summary dismissal of his petition for habeas corpus relief and alleges that his 60 year second degree murder sentence has expired. Because the record fails to establish that the sentence has expired, we affirm the dismissal of the petition.
Authoring Judge: Judge J. Curwood Witt, Jr.
Originating Judge:Timothy L. Easter |
Hickman County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 11/22/00 | |
| Stephen L.Carey vs. State
E2000-00847-CCA-R3-PC
This is a post-conviction appeal. The petitioner is currently serving life as an habitual criminal plus a consecutive 105 years for other offenses, all imposed in 1987. The petitioner timely filed three petitions for post-conviction relief challenging his guilty pleas for offenses occurring in 1969, 1981, and 1983, all of which were subsequently used to establish his habitual criminal status. The petitioner attempted to amend his petitions for post-conviction relief by challenging two of his 1987 convictions, but it was denied as untimely. All petitions were dismissed by the trial court after a hearing. In this appeal as a matter of right, the petitioner contends (1) he received ineffective assistance of counsel and inadequate advice of his constitutional rights from the trial court, thereby rendering his guilty pleas involuntary and unknowing; and (2) the post-conviction court erroneously dismissed his amendment to the petition for post-conviction relief. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the post-conviction court correctly denied post-conviction relief.
Authoring Judge: Judge Joe G. Riley
Originating Judge:Richard R. Baumgartner |
Knox County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 11/22/00 | |
| State vs. Vance Shelton
E2000-01632-CCA-R3-CD
Defendant was convicted of rape of a child and aggravated sexual battery. The defendant was sentenced to twenty-five years for rape of a child and twelve years for aggravated sexual battery, to run consecutively to each other and consecutively to a prior four-year sentence. In this appeal, the defendant makes the following allegations: (1) the evidence was insufficient to support his convictions; (2) the trial court erred in failing to grant a mistrial due to a variance between the indictment and the state's proof at trial; (3) the trial court erred in ruling his prior convictions for arson would be admissible if he testified; and (4) his sentences are excessive. Upon our review of the record, we remand for modification of the judgment for aggravated sexual battery to reflect the proper date of the offense, but affirm the judgments in all other respects.
Authoring Judge: Judge Joe G. Riley
Originating Judge:James E. Beckner |
Greene County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 11/22/00 |
