Please enter some keywords to search.
|
Merritt vs. Yates
M1999-00775-COA-R3-CV
This appeal involves a dispute between Plaintiff June Yates Merritt ("Ms. Merritt") and Defendants Aileen Biron Yates ("Mrs. Yates") and Claire Biron ("Mr. Biron") regarding the proper interpretation or construction of mutual wills executed in April of 1985 by Mrs. Yates and her husband Thomas Harry Yates ("Mr. Yates"), who was the father of Ms. Merritt. After the death of Mr. Yates in December of 1985, Mrs. Yates deeded certain real property to Mr. Biron, gifted certain personal property to Mr. Biron, and established a revocable trust using money received as a result of her husband's death. In an action filed by Ms. Merritt challenging these transactions, the trial court determined that there were no genuine issues of material fact and entered a judgment in favor of Ms. Merritt. Additionally, the court denied Ms. Merritt's motion for discretionary costs. Mrs. Yates appeals the court's order granting a judgment in favor of Ms. Merritt and Ms. Merritt appeals the court's ruling regarding her motion for discretionary costs. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the ruling of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge David R. Farmer
Originating Judge:Ellen Hobbs Lyle |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 07/11/00 | |
|
Beavers vs. The Lebanon Democrat Newspaper
M1999-02401-COA-R3-CV
This appeal arises from an action initiated by Plaintiffs, Mae and Jerry Beavers, against the Defendant newspaper, the Lebanon Democrat, for libel and slander. The Beavers' claim arises out of two separate articles published by the newspaper. The trial court granted the newspaper's motion for summary judgment, holding that the first article was substantially true and the second article was a non-actionable opinion. The Beavers appeal.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Alan E. Highers
Originating Judge:Tom E. Gray |
Wilson County | Court of Appeals | 07/11/00 | |
|
State vs. Jerry Rodgers
W1999-01443-CCA-R3-CD
The defendant was convicted of reckless homicide and sentenced to eight years as a Range II, multiple offender. On appeal, the defendant raises the issue of whether the trial court erred in relying on New York convictions as prior felonies in order to sentence him as a multiple offender. After review, we conclude that the record does not support the trial court's finding that the New York convictions qualified as prior felonies for sentencing purposes. Accordingly, we reverse, and remand the case to the trial court for resentencing.
Authoring Judge: Judge Alan E. Glenn
Originating Judge:Chris B. Craft |
Shelby County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/11/00 | |
|
State vs. Michael W. Smith
W1999-01817-CCA-R3-PC
The petitioner pled guilty in Shelby County Criminal Court to two counts of rape, two counts of aggravated burglary, and five misdemeanor counts. He was sentenced, pursuant to a negotiated plea agreement, to ten years for each of the rape counts; six years for each of the aggravated burglary counts; and eleven months and twenty-nine days for each of the misdemeanor counts, with all sentences to be served concurrently for an effective sentence of ten years. The sequence of the charges was that the petitioner was arrested and charged with a rape, an aggravated burglary, and all of the misdemeanor counts, released on bail, and later arrested for the second rape and aggravated burglary, both of which occurred while he was on bail for the first set of charges. In this petition for post-conviction relief, the petitioner sought to have his guilty pleas set aside on the grounds that his pleas were not voluntarily and knowingly made and he received ineffective assistance of counsel. It is unnecessary to address those issues because it appears from the record that the negotiated plea agreement was in violation of Tennessee Code Annotated Section 40-20-111(b), requiring that a sentence for a felony committed while on bail be served consecutively to the sentence for the initial felony charge. Because we do not know whether the petitioner would have entered his pleas of guilty had he known of the requirement regarding consecutive sentencing, on remand the petitioner must be allowed to withdraw his pleas of guilty as to both of the rape and both of the aggravated burglary charges.
Authoring Judge: Judge Alan E. Glenn
Originating Judge:John P. Colton, Jr. |
Shelby County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/11/00 | |
|
Jeremy Tompkins vs. Mary Rainey
W1999-01218-COA-R3-CV
In this action to establish parentage, Jeremy Earl Tompkins (Father) appeals the trial court's final judgment awarding Mary Helen Rainey (Mother) custody of the parties' infant son. We affirm the trial court's judgment.
Authoring Judge: Judge David R. Farmer
Originating Judge:A. V. Mcdowell |
Shelby County | Court of Appeals | 07/11/00 | |
|
State vs. Michael Sample & Larry McKay
W1999-01202-CCA-R3-PC
The Defendants were each convicted in 1982 of two counts of felony murder. Each Defendant received two death penalties for the murders. On post-conviction, the Defendants contend that the State withheld exculpatory information and that their death penalties were predicated in part on an invalid aggravating circumstance. The trial court dismissed the petitions without a hearing, finding that the Brady claims were time-barred and finding beyond a reasonable doubt that the jury would have imposed the death sentences absent consideration of the invalid aggravating circumstance. The Defendants now appeal the trial court's findings on both claims for relief. We affirm the trial court's judgment.
Originating Judge:Bernie Weinman |
Shelby County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/11/00 | |
|
State of Tennessee v. Michael Eisom
W1999-00739-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Alan E. Glenn
Originating Judge:Joseph H. Walker, III |
Lauderdale County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/11/00 | |
|
Deshawn Mcclenton v. State of Tennessee
W2002-02745-CCA-R3-PC
Authoring Judge: Judge Gary R Wade
Originating Judge:Chris B. Craft |
Shelby County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/11/00 | |
|
State vs. Gene Logue
W1999-01795-CCA-R3-CD
Defendant was convicted of theft of property over $500.00, and sentenced to two (2) years as a Range I standard offender. Defendant now appeals as of right, and raises the following issues: the evidence is insufficient to sustain his conviction, the court erred in failing to grant his motion for judgment of acquittal because the state failed to prove the value of the property stolen and the venue of the crime in Benton County, and the court erred in sentencing defendant to serve two (2) years and failing to consider alternative sentencing. We affirm the decision of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Cornelia A. Clark
Originating Judge:Julian P. Guinn |
Benton County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/11/00 | |
|
State vs. Christopher Henderson
W1999-00958-CCA-R3-CD
Defendant appeals the trial court's denial of judicial diversion and full probation following his guilty plea to possession of cocaine under 0.5 grams with intent to deliver and possession of drug paraphernalia. We affirm the judgment of the trial court pursuant to Rule 20, Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals.
Authoring Judge: Judge Joe G. Riley
|
Lauderdale County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/11/00 | |
|
Charles Montague vs. State
E2000-00083-CCA-R3-PC
Charles Montague appeals the Washington County Criminal Court's summary dismissal of his pro se post-conviction petition challenging his conviction for first degree murder. The appellant's original and supplemental petitions with attached affidavit present a myriad of claims within the trial process. The post-conviction court dismissed all claims without a hearing, finding the original and supplemental petitions were not properly verified and that the petitions failed to assert a sufficient factual basis for relief. After review of the petition, we affirm the post-conviction court's dismissal of certain claims and vacate its dismissal as to others. The case is remanded to the post-conviction court for further review of the surviving claims.
Authoring Judge: Judge David G. Hayes
Originating Judge:Lynn W. Brown |
Washington County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/11/00 | |
|
State vs. Sammy Bonds
W2001-02859-CCA-R3-PC
Petitioner, Sammy S. Bonds, appeals the trial court's denial of his petition for post-conviction relief. Petitioner's pro se petition alleges that he received ineffective assistance of counsel. We reject Petitioner's argument and affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Thomas T. Woodall
Originating Judge:Roy B. Morgan, Jr. |
Madison County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/11/00 | |
|
State v. Dwanna L. Mason
M1999-02535-CCA-R3-CD
The defendant pled guilty in Davidson County Criminal Court to vehicular homicide by reckless conduct, a Class C felony, and four lesser charges against her were dismissed. Her guilty plea was submitted without any agreement of the parties as to length or manner of service of sentence. After a sentencing hearing at which the defendant testified, the trial court sentenced her to five years and six months in continuous confinement. The defendant appeals as of right this sentence. We conclude that the imposition of a sentence of five years and six months was appropriate. We affirm the sentence as to length but modify it to show a period of confinement equal to time already served with the remaining time to be served on probation.
Authoring Judge: Judge Alan E. Glenn
Originating Judge:Frank G. Clement, Jr. |
Davidson County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/11/00 | |
|
State vs. Reginald Merriweather
W1999-02050-CCA-R3-CD
The defendant appeals his jury convictions of attempted second degree murder, aggravated assault, and especially aggravated robbery. He raises the following issues: (1) whether the trial judge erred in denying defendant's request for a mistrial based on a juror's response during voir dire; (2) whether the trial court erred in directing a witness to answer questions on cross-examination; (3) whether the evidence was sufficient to support his convictions; and (4) whether the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury as to certain lesser-included offenses. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Authoring Judge: Judge Cornelia A. Clark
Originating Judge:John Franklin Murchison |
Madison County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/11/00 | |
|
State vs. Michael Christopher Adams and Jerry Holt
E1999-00446-CCA-R3-CD
The defendants, Michael Christopher Adams and Jerry Holt, Jr., appeal their convictions by a Sullivan County jury. Adams was convicted of second degree murder and four counts of aggravated assault. He received a total sentence of forty-nine years. Holt was convicted of four counts of aggravated assault and received a total sentence of twenty years. Both defendants challenge the sufficiency of the evidence and the trial court's imposition of consecutive sentencing. Adams also challenges the trial court's application of enhancement factors and failure to apply mitigating factors. We hold that the evidence is sufficient, but we hold that the trial court erred in sentencing. Adams's sentence is modified to reflect a total sentence of forty years, and Holt's sentence is modified to reflect a total sentence of twelve years.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Joseph M. Tipton
Originating Judge:Richard R. Vance |
Sullivan County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/11/00 | |
|
State of Tennessee v. Daronopolis R. Sweatt
M1999-2522-CCA-R3-CD
Originating Judge:John H. Gasaway, III |
Montgomery County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/11/00 | |
|
State vs. Freddie Norment
W1999-01928-CCA-R3-CD
The defendant was convicted of aggravated assault for wounding a jail cell mate with a homemade knife. On appeal, the defendant raises the following issues: whether the jury's verdict was supported by the evidence; whether the trial court erred in denying the defendant's motion to examine a potential witness outside the jury's presence; and whether the trial court erred in failing to issue curative jury instructions after the allegedly improper testimony of a prosecution witness. Based upon our review, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Alan E. Glenn
Originating Judge:Jon Kerry Blackwood |
Fayette County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/11/00 | |
|
State vs. Henderson
W1998-00342-SC-DDT-DD
Authoring Judge: Justice William M. Barker
Originating Judge:Jon Kerry Blackwood |
Fayette County | Supreme Court | 07/10/00 | |
|
In Re: S.D., M.D., Sh.D., & Ma.S.
M2003-02672-COA-R3-PT
This case comes before the Court on appeal from the Sumner County Juvenile Court's termination of Appellant's parental rights as to four children. Each parent raises separate issues on appeal. We affirm the action of the trial court in all respects.
Authoring Judge: Judge William B. Cain
Originating Judge:Barry R. Brown |
Sumner County | Court of Appeals | 07/10/00 | |
|
John Watson vs. Mike Young
W1999-00683-COA-R3-CV
This appeal arises from a lawsuit filed by an inmate at the Northwest Correctional Complex. The complaint sought damages for personal injuries sustained as a result of an electrical shock allegedly caused by the Defendant's inactions. The Lake County Circuit Court dismissed the complaint finding that the plaintiff's claim sounded in negligence and the defendants, as state employees, enjoyed absolute immunity from negligence claims.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Alan E. Highers
Originating Judge:R. Lee Moore Jr. |
Lake County | Court of Appeals | 07/10/00 | |
|
State vs. Morris
W1998-00679-SC-DDT-DD
Authoring Judge: Justice E. Riley Anderson
Originating Judge:John Franklin Murchison |
Madison County | Supreme Court | 07/10/00 | |
|
James Powell vs. M.P. Gurkin
W1999-00827-COA-R3-CV
This is a personal injury action arising out of a slip-and-fall accident which occurred at a laundromat owned by the Gurkin Defendants. The fall was allegedly caused by a hole in the floor of the laundromat which was created by the Defendant Hardin in attempting to locate and repair a water leak in the laundromat. The Plaintiff fell while walking into the laundromat carrying his laundry basket. He brought the present suit claiming that the Defendants were negligent in failing to repair the hole or providing adequate warning of the dangerous condition. The Defendants filed a Motion for Summary Judgment claiming that the Plaintiff failed to use reasonable care in confronting a known risk. After arguments of counsel, the trial court granted both Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Alan E. Highers
Originating Judge:Jon Kerry Blackwood |
Fayette County | Court of Appeals | 07/10/00 | |
|
State vs. Jeffrey Wayne Adkisson
E1999-01316-CCA-R3-CD
The defendant, convicted of one count of D.U.I., argues that the evidence was insufficient and that a police report submitted as evidence was unfairly redacted. After review, we find no reversible error and therefore affirm the judgment from the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge John Everett Williams
Originating Judge:E. Eugene Eblen |
Morgan County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/10/00 | |
|
State vs. Henderson
W1998-00342-SC-DDT-DD
Authoring Judge: Justice William M. Barker
Originating Judge:Jon Kerry Blackwood |
Fayette County | Supreme Court | 07/10/00 | |
|
Brent Brown v. Continental Baking Company
W1999-02700-SC-WCM-CV
This case involves a work-related injury to the plaintiff's left shoulder on August 17, 1992. The trial court heard the evidence on July 2, 1998, and found that the plaintiff sustained a compensable 12.5 percent permanent partial disability to the left shoulder but that the injury he claimed to the right shoulder was not work-related. The trial court also rejected the plaintiff's argument that he did not have a meaningful return to work and found that the two and one-half (2.5) times cap in Tennessee Code Annotated _ 5-6-241(a) applied. The plaintiff appealed pro se and raised the following issues for our review: (1) whether the plaintiff's right shoulder injury was work-related; (2) whether the plaintiff should be compensated for a second surgery on the right shoulder and both feet; (3) whether the original complaint was not re-filed properly; (4) whether there should have been a court reporter present at the hearing; and (5) whether evidence was improperly withheld from the court in his case. After careful review, we find that we must affirm the trial court's judgment.
Authoring Judge: F. Lloyd Tatum, Senior Judge
Originating Judge:Karen R. Williams, Judge |
Shelby County | Workers Compensation Panel | 07/07/00 |