Please enter some keywords to search.
|
Kennedy vs. Holder et al
01A01-9805-CV-00242
Originating Judge:Buddy D. Perry |
Franklin County | Court of Appeals | 04/16/99 | |
|
Cochran vs. Lowe
03A01-9809-CV-00292
|
Court of Appeals | 04/16/99 | ||
|
State vs. Edward L. Samuels
01C01-9803-CR-00145
|
Davidson County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 04/16/99 | |
|
City of Cleveland vs. Bradley County .
03A01-9804-CV-00140
|
Bradley County | Court of Appeals | 04/16/99 | |
|
Stuart Bowden vs. Memphis Bd. Ed.
02A01-9807-CH-00217
Originating Judge:C. Neal Small |
Shelby County | Court of Appeals | 04/16/99 | |
|
State vs. Lon Walker
01C01-9711-CR-00535
Originating Judge:Leon C. Burns, Jr. |
Putnam County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 04/16/99 | |
|
B.C.I. vs. City of Memphis
02A01-9709-CH-00238
Originating Judge:C. Neal Small |
Shelby County | Court of Appeals | 04/16/99 | |
|
Coleman vs. Coleman
03A01-9810-CV-00329
|
Cumberland County | Court of Appeals | 04/16/99 | |
|
State vs. Robert P. Thurman
01C01-9806-CC-00253
|
Maury County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 04/16/99 | |
|
Morgan vs. Driskill
03A01-9802-CV-00079
|
Jefferson County | Court of Appeals | 04/16/99 | |
|
Ricky McElhaney vs. State
01C01-9806-CR-00247
Originating Judge:Seth W. Norman |
Davidson County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 04/16/99 | |
|
State vs. Melissa Roberts
01C01-9806-CR-00238
|
Sumner County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 04/16/99 | |
|
Patricia Anne Pehlman v. Gregory Lawrence Pehlman and Sobieski and Associates
3A01-9809-CV-00311
In this action Patricia Anne Pehlman essentially seeks a declaration that marital property awarded to her in a divorce is not subject to a lien in favor of the intervenor.
Authoring Judge: Judge Herschel Pickens Franks
Originating Judge:Judge Bill Swann |
Knox County | Court of Appeals | 04/15/99 | |
|
McNair vs. Smith
03A01-9804-CH-00122
|
Court of Appeals | 04/15/99 | ||
|
McKinley vs. Holt
03A01-9807-PB-00220
|
Court of Appeals | 04/15/99 | ||
|
Janice Hillyer vs. Charles Hillyer
M1998-00942-COA-R3-CV
The issues in this post-divorce case arise because the former husband's waiver of military retirement pay in order to receive disability benefits cut off the former wife's receipt of her portion of the retirement pay which had been awarded to her in the distribution of marital property. The former wife filed a contempt petition, seeking to reinstate her portion of the benefits. The trial court, relying on Gilliland v. Stanley, an unpublished opinion from this court, denied her motion for contempt. In light of our Supreme Court's holding in Johnson v. Johnson, No. W1999-01232-SC-R11-CV, 2001 WL 173502 (Tenn. Feb. 23, 2001), we reverse and remand.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Patricia J. Cottrell
Originating Judge:James E. Walton |
Montgomery County | Court of Appeals | 04/15/99 | |
|
Street vs. Waddell
03A01-9710-CV-00488
|
Washington County | Court of Appeals | 04/15/99 | |
|
State vs. Antonio Ward
02C01-9808-CC-00233
Originating Judge:Whit A. Lafon |
Madison County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 04/15/99 | |
|
Norris vs. Gounaris
03A01-9807-CH-00238
|
Court of Appeals | 04/15/99 | ||
|
Janice Hillyer vs. Charles Hillyer
M1998-00942-COA-R3-CV
The issues in this post-divorce case arise because the former husband's waiver of military retirement pay in order to receive disability benefits cut off the former wife's receipt of her portion of the retirement pay which had been awarded to her in the distribution of marital property. The former wife filed a contempt petition, seeking to reinstate her portion of the benefits. The trial court, relying on Gilliland v. Stanley, an unpublished opinion from this court, denied her motion for contempt. In light of our Supreme Court's holding in Johnson v. Johnson, No. W1999-01232-SC-R11-CV, 2001 WL 173502 (Tenn. Feb. 23, 2001), we reverse and remand.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Patricia J. Cottrell
Originating Judge:James E. Walton |
Montgomery County | Court of Appeals | 04/15/99 | |
|
O'Bryant vs. Reeder Chevrolet
03A01-9810-CV-00325
|
Court of Appeals | 04/15/99 | ||
|
Suzette Marie Elder vs. Sidney Lee Elder
M1998-00935-COA-R3-CV
This appeal involves a post-divorce custody dispute precipitated by the custodial parent's decision to accept a job in Texas. The custodial parent requested the Circuit Court for Franklin County to permit the parties' children to accompany him to Texas and to adjust the visitation arrangements accordingly. The non-custodial parent responded by requesting the trial court to change custody. Following a bench trial, the trial court declined to change the existing custody arrangement and permitted the custodial parent to move to Texas. On this appeal, the non-custodial parent takes issue with both the denial of her petition to change custody and the approval of the custodial parent's move to Texas. We have determined that the record supports both of these decisions and, therefore, affirm the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge William C. Koch, Jr.
Originating Judge:J. Curtis Smith |
Franklin County | Court of Appeals | 04/15/99 | |
|
State vs. Michael Elvis Green
W2001-00455-CCA-R3-CD
A Hardeman County jury found the defendant guilty of rape. Four issues are raised on appeal: (1) whether there was sufficient evidence to support the conviction; (2) whether the trial court erred in denying the defendant a continuance; (3) whether evidence of the defendant's escape from jail was improperly admitted; and (4) whether the trial court should have charged the jury as to sexual battery, statutory rape, and Class B misdemeanor assault as lesser-included offenses of rape. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Joe G. Riley
Originating Judge:Jon Kerry Blackwood |
Hardeman County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 04/15/99 | |
|
Julia Leach Bryan vs. James Leach
M1998-00922-COA-R3-CV
This case involves post-divorce disputes over alimony and child support and issues of contempt of court. The father commenced this appeal after the trial court declined to modify or terminate his alimony obligation and awarded the mother more than $50,000 in child support arrearages and, later, found the father in contempt of court and ordered him to pay a fine of $100 per day until all judgments were paid to the mother. On appeal, the father argues that his alimony obligation should have terminated or decreased, that a portion of his child support payments should be placed in trust for the benefit of the children, and that the trial court erred by fining him for contempt. We affirm the trial court's orders but modify the fine imposed upon the father.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Patricia J. Cottrell
Originating Judge:Jim T. Hamilton |
Maury County | Court of Appeals | 04/15/99 | |
|
Dpt. Human Services vs. Whaley
03A01-9809-JV-00272
|
Court of Appeals | 04/15/99 |