Bain vs. City of Murfreesboro
|
Rutherford | Court of Appeals | |
Aghili vs. Saadatnejadi
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Henderson vs. Harlan, d/b/a: Lodge Quarters
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Wood vs. Prosser, et. al.
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
State vs. Vernon West & Derenzy Turner
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9602-CC-00066
|
McMinn | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Than Those Articulated By The Majority. The Majority Relies Upon State v. Marshall,
|
McMinn | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Than Those Articulated By The Majority. The Majority Relies Upon State v. Marshall,
|
McMinn | Court of Appeals | |
03C01-9603-CC-00099
|
Sullivan | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Jimmy Robinson
|
Lake | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. William Johnson
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Johnny Perry
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. James Harvest
|
Hardeman | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Barry Wells vs. Ron Rickard
|
Lauderdale | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Glenda Whisenhunt vs. Gordon Whisenhunt
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
David Dunnehew vs. Donna Dunnehew
|
Court of Appeals | ||
State vs. James Harvest
|
Hardeman | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Thelma W. Kelley, v. John E. Vance and Betty L. Vance, and Allstate Insurance Company
In this action, plaintiff seeks uninsured motorist coverage from her insurance company, and the Trial Court, responding to motion for summary judgment, granted judgment to defendant Allstate Insurance Company (Allstate). Plaintiff has appealed.
|
Sevier | Court of Appeals | |
State vs. Freddie Mans
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Barry Wells vs. Ron Rickard
|
Lauderdale | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. David Paul Martin
We granted review in this case to determine whether a court-ordered mental evaluation violated the defendant’s right against self-incrimination and the right to counsel under the United States and Tennessee Constitutions. |
Supreme Court | ||
Pacific Properties, v. Home Federal Bank of Tennessee, v. Michael S. Stalcup
This action for conversion was submitted to a jury which returned a general verdict for the plaintiff, thereby implicitly finding that the fact-driven principal defense of the Statute of Limitations was not well-taken. Home Federal appeals and presents for review issues which, as paraphrased, question the propriety of the submission of the case to the jury, whether the defense of Statute of Limitations was well-taken, as a matter of law, whether requested jury instructions should have been given and whether the drawer of a check adequately instructed the drawee Bank as to its disposition. Pacific Properties |
Court of Appeals | ||
First Tennessee Bank, National Association, v. Jessi O. Quillian
This case originated as an action to collect monies due under the terms of a promissory note executed by the defendant to the plaintiff First Tennessee Bank, National Association. An answer was filed by the defendant admitting the execution of the note and that there was an outstanding balance thereon. He also filed a counterclaim in which he sought a setoff and damages for forged checks drawn on his account and paid by the bank. The trial court on motion of the plaintiff, entered a summary judgment against the defendant on the original complaint and dismissed the counterclaim. A judgment in the amount of $34,399.24 was entered against the defendant. This appeal resulted. We affirm the judgment of the trial court. |
Hamilton | Court of Appeals | |
Keith Hardware, Inc. v. Douglas L. White and Carolyn L. White - Concurring
The issue on this interlocutory appeal granted pursuant to T. R. A. P. Rule 9, is whether the lease between the parties is too broad to be enforceable, as was held by the Trial Court. |
Washington | Court of Appeals | |
Anthony W. Nance and Brandon Nance v. Christopher H. Strunk
In this action arisitn grom a motor vehicle accident, the defendants were granted summary judgment and plaintiffs have appealed. |
Campbell | Court of Appeals |