APPELLATE COURT OPINIONS

Please enter some keywords to search.
Franklin Hartsell v. Dallas & Mavis Forwarding Co., et al.

01S01-9608-CH-00164
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance with Tenn. Code Ann. _ 5-6-225(e)(3) for hearing and reporting to the Supreme Court of findings of fact and conclusions of law. The plaintiff, age 54, suffered a job-related myocardial infarction on March 1, 1994. A coronary arteriogram revealed an 8% blockage of his left anterior descending artery which was alleviated by an angioplasty procedure which reduced the blockage to less than 15%. Conservative treatment followed, and he was released to return to full employment on January 1, 1994. From that day forward, the plaintiff has worked steadily and without incident. In July 1991, the plaintiff was hospitalized with chest pains. A cardiac catheterization was performed, which revealed a serious lesion in his left circumflex coronary artery at the left ventricular ridge, with another lesion in his left anterior descending coronary artery. After the 1994 infarction, the lesion in the left anterior artery was substantially worsened. The employer insists that the award is excessive because it was improperly onerated with liability for impairment resulting from pre-existing coronary artery disease. Liability for benefits resulting from impairment as a consequence of the myocardial infarction is conceded. The dispositive issue at trial was the extent of the plaintiff's partial permanent disability. The Chancellor found that the plaintiff had a 5% permanent partial disability and awarded benef its accordingly. Our review is de novo on the record, accompanied by the presumption that the trial court's judgment is correct unless the evidence preponderates otherwise. T.C.A. _ 5-6-225(e)(2). The treating physician, Dr. K.P. Channabasappa, testified that the plaintiff's impairment was 29%, which may be extrapolated to Category II of the AMA Guidelines. He stated in a pre-deposition letter that "it is 29%" and on direct examination testified that the impairment was 29%. There was no countervailing testimony offered. 2
Authoring Judge: William H. Inman, Senior Judge
Originating Judge:Hon. Ellen Hobbs Lyle,
Franklin County Workers Compensation Panel 05/16/97
Georgia Keys vs. Memphis Carwash, Inc.

02A01-9605-CV-00113

Originating Judge:Kay S. Robilio
Shelby County Court of Appeals 05/15/97
Brandy Thatcher, b/n/f vs. Bobby Wyatt, et al

02A01-9605-CH-00114

Originating Judge:George R. Ellis
Haywood County Court of Appeals 05/15/97
State vs. Johnny Smith

02C01-9602-CR-00061

Originating Judge:James C. Beasley, Jr.
Shelby County Court of Criminal Appeals 05/15/97
State vs. Mario Gutierrez

02C01-9502-CC-00043
Hardin County Court of Criminal Appeals 05/15/97
State vs. Miller

03C01-9608-CR-00300

Originating Judge:R. Jerry Beck
Sullivan County Court of Criminal Appeals 05/14/97
Burgess & Carter vs. Mead Johnson

01A01-9609-CV-00436

Originating Judge:John W. Rollins
Coffee County Court of Appeals 05/14/97
Gentry vs. Gentry

01A01-9611-CH-00512

Originating Judge:Alex W. Darnell
Montgomery County Court of Appeals 05/14/97
Estate of Edward P. Russell, Deceased

01A01-9611-PB-00516
Tracy Moore, B/N/F/ Shirley Moore vs. James Prescott, II 02A01-9609-CV-00227 View

Originating Judge:John A. Turnbull
Court of Appeals 05/14/97
03C01-9605-CC-00190

03C01-9605-CC-00190

Originating Judge:Rex Henry Ogle
Cocke County Court of Criminal Appeals 05/14/97
Nance vs. Nance

01A01-9611-CV-00515

Originating Judge:Muriel Robinson
Davidson County Court of Appeals 05/14/97
Portland Utilities Construction v. Chase Creek

M2002-02886-COA-R3-CV
A utilities contractor sued a subdivision developer for payment for work it performed on the subdivision's infrastructure. The court found that the developer was obligated to honor its contract by paying for work with a value of $313,829. The court also found that the developer was entitled to an offset of $55,955 for damages resulting from defects in the contractor's performance. The developer argues on appeal that the trial court erroneously declined to grant it additional offsets. We affirm the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Patricia J. Cottrell
Originating Judge:Irvin H. Kilcrease, Jr.
Davidson County Court of Appeals 05/14/97
Gozenbach vs. Gozenbach

03A01-9609-CV-00314
Court of Appeals 05/13/97
Patricia Dunn v. H.D. Lee Co.

01S01-9604-CH-00061
This case is before the Court upon motion for review pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann. _ 50-6-225(e)(5)(B), the entire record, including the order of referral to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel, and the Panel's Memorandum Opinion setting forth its findings of fact and conclusions of law in dismissing as untimely plaintiff's claim for workers' compensation benefits.
Authoring Judge: Per Curiam
Originating Judge:PER CURIAM
Lincoln County Workers Compensation Panel 05/13/97
Carrier Air Conditioning, et al. v. Henry Maguffin

01S01-9607-CV-00135
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance with Tenn. Code Ann. section 5-6-225(e)(3) for hearing and reporting of findings of fact and conclusions of law. In this appeal, the employee or claimant, Maguffin, contends the evidence preponderates against the trial court's finding that he did not suffer an injury by accident. The panel has concluded the judgment should be affirmed. The claimant was working for Carrier in August of 1993 when he sprained his wrist while operating an air gun, thereby aggravating a pre- existing fracture, or "non-union of the scaphoid bone." His wrist swelled and he felt immediate pain. He received first aid from the company nurse, but continued to work. Almost a year later, because of continuing complaints of pain, he was referred by the employer to an orthopedic surgeon. The doctor operated and returned the claimant to work with some restrictions. In his deposition, the doctor opined that the injury aggravated the pre-existing condition by increasing pain, but did not create any permanent anatomical change. The surgeon was properly paid by the employer. The trial court found that the claimant had not suffered an injury by accident as contemplated by the Workers' Compensation Act. Appellate review is de novo upon the record of the trial court, accompanied by a presumption of correctness, unless the preponderance of the evidence is otherwise. Tenn. Code Ann. section 5-6-225(e)(2). Under the Tennessee Workers' Compensation Law, injuries by accident arising out of and in the course of employment which cause either disablement or death of the employee are compensable. Tenn. Code Ann. section 5-6-12(a)(5). An accidental injury is one which cannot be reasonably anticipated, is unexpected and is precipitated by unusual combinations of fortuitous circumstances. See Fink v. Caudle, 856 S.W.2d 952 (Tenn. 1993), and cases cited therein. An employer takes its employee with all pre-existing conditions, and cannot escape liability when the employee, upon suffering a work related injury, incurs disability far greater than if he had not had the pre-existing condition; Rogers v. Shaw, 813 S.W.2d 397 (Tenn. 1991); but if work aggravates a pre-existing condition merely by increasing pain, there is no injury by accident. Townsend v. State, 826 S.W.2d 434 (Tenn. 1992). The undisputed medical proof from the operating surgeon is that this claimant's aggravation of a pre-existing condition merely increased his pain 2
Authoring Judge: Joe C. Loser, Jr., Special Judge
Originating Judge:Hon. Gerald L. Ewell, Sr.,
Coffee County Workers Compensation Panel 05/13/97
Bunch vs. Bunch

03A01-9609-GS-00301
Court of Appeals 05/13/97
State vs. Hicks

03C01-9602-CC-00064
Washington County Court of Criminal Appeals 05/13/97
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX

X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
Court of Appeals 05/13/97
State vs. Copeland

03C01-9605-CC-00196

Originating Judge:D. Kelly Thomas, Jr.
Blount County Court of Criminal Appeals 05/13/97
Bell vs. Carter

03A01-9610-CH-00334
Court of Appeals 05/13/97
Savco vs. Century

03A01-9611-CV-00360
Court of Appeals 05/13/97
Upper East Tenn. vs. Johnson

03A01-9701-CH-00011
Court of Appeals 05/13/97
Dianne B. Fowler v. Liberty Mutual Ins. Co, et al.

01S01-9607-GS-00151
Authoring Judge: William H. Inman, Senior Judge
Originating Judge:Hon.
Warren County Workers Compensation Panel 05/13/97
State vs. Violet

03C01-9603-CC-00135

Originating Judge:Mayo L. Mashburn
McMinn County Court of Criminal Appeals 05/13/97
State vs. Brown

03C01-9604-CC-00140
Hancock County Court of Criminal Appeals 05/13/97