State of Tennessee v. William Bryan Gatlin
M2013-02440-CCA-R3-CD
The Defendant, William Bryan Gatlin, was convicted by a Marshall County Circuit Court jury of possession of marijuana with the intent to sell and possession of marijuana with the intent to deliver, Class E felonies, and possession of drug paraphernalia, a Class A misdemeanor. See T.C.A. §§ 39-17-417(a)(4) (possession of a controlled substance) (Supp. 2012) (amended 2014), 39-17-425 (possession of drug paraphernalia) (2014). The trial court merged the possession of marijuana convictions. The Defendant was sentenced to serve two years for the merged possession of marijuana conviction and eleven months, twenty-nine days for possession of drug paraphernalia. The sentences were imposed consecutively to each other and to any unexpired sentence. On appeal, the Defendant contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence obtained during a knock-and-talk encounter and a warrantless entry into his apartment and that the judgments should be reversed because without the illegally obtained evidence, the remaining evidence is insufficient to support his convictions. We affirm the judgments of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Robert H. Montgomery, Jr.
Originating Judge:Judge F. Lee Russell |
Marshall County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 01/02/15 | |
Cathy Turnbo Franks v. Ronald Franks
W2014-00429-COA-R3-CV
This appeal involves various financial issues relative to a divorce. Husband appeals the trial court’s determination of several factual findings relative to alimony, including Wife’s ability to secure employment, Husband’s ability to earn in the future, the award of attorney’s fees to Wife, and the value of several marital assets divided in the property division, including the value of an LLC jointly owned by the parties. Wife also appeals the trial court’s determination of value and the division of the parties’ joint interest in the LLC, which the trial court awarded to Husband without assigning a value. We vacate the judgment of the trial court and remand for appropriate findings of fact and conclusions of law.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge J. Steven Stafford
Originating Judge:Judge James Y. Ross |
Court of Appeals | 01/02/15 | ||
In Re: Donald C., et al
M2014-01327-COA-R3-PT
Mother’s parental rights to her children were terminated on grounds of abandonment by failure to visit, persistence of conditions, and noncompliance with a permanency plan. Mother challenged the ground of abandonment, arguing there was a no contact order in place that prevented her from visiting her children. When the no contact order was put into place, Mother was informed she would be able to visit her children if she passed drug tests and took parenting classes. Mother continued to test positive for illegal drugs and failed to take advantage of services offered by the Department of Children’s Services. We affirm the trial court’s judgment that Mother abandoned her children by failing to visit them and that it is in their best interest to terminate her rights. A petition for custody that may have been pending when Mother’s rights were terminated is part of a different proceeding and does not render the court’s decision to terminate Mother’s rights premature.
Authoring Judge: Judge Andy D. Bennett
Originating Judge:Judge A. Andrew Jackson |
Dickson County | Court of Appeals | 12/30/14 | |
State of Tennessee v. Lashay Nicole Scruggs
W2014-00091-CCA-R3-CD
Lashay Nicole Scruggs (“the Defendant”) appeals from the trial court’s denial of judicial diversion. On appeal, the Defendant argues that the trial court abused its discretion by (1) placing heavy emphasis on charges listed as “pending” in the pre-sentence report but that were actually disposed of prior to the sentencing hearing; (2) placing emphasis on the presence of marijuana in the Defendant’s system when marijuana use was not an element of vehicular manslaughter as charged in this case; and (3) placing emphasis on the need to deter others from driving irresponsibly when there was no evidence of such a need in the record. Upon review, we find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion and affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Robert L. Holloway, Jr.
Originating Judge:Judge J. Weber McCraw |
Fayette County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 12/30/14 | |
In Re V.L.J. et al
E2013-02815-COA-R3-PT
This is a parental termination case. It focuses on the three children of a married couple, D.G.B. (Mother) and D.C.B. (Father), and Mother’s child (V.L.J.) from an earlier relationship. The four children came into the custody of the Department of Children’s Services (DCS) in 2009. Nearly four years later, DCS filed a petition to terminate the rights of the parents. Following a trial, the court granted the petition based upon its finding (1) that multiple grounds for termination exist and (2) that termination is in the best interest of the children. Both findings were said by the trial court to be made by clear and convincing evidence. Mother and Father appeal. We affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge Charles D. Susano, Jr.
Originating Judge:Judge Tammy M. Harrington |
Blount County | Court of Appeals | 12/30/14 | |
George Ernest Diggs v. David Lingo, et al.
W2014-00525-COA-R3-CV
This is an appeal from an order denying a motion to compel arbitration. The beneficiaries of a trust filed this lawsuit against the trustee alleging trustee self-dealing arising from a transaction in which the trustee and his wife purchased certain real property from the trust as tenants by the entirety. The beneficiaries sought to set aside a portion of the sale. The trustee filed a motion to compel arbitration pursuant to an arbitration clause in the trust agreement. The beneficiaries opposed the motion, arguing that they could not be compelled to arbitrate their claims against the trustee’s wife. The trial court agreed and denied the motion. The court found that the trustee’s wife was a necessary party to the resolution of the dispute, but because she was not a party to the trust agreement, there was no enforceable arbitration agreement between her and the beneficiaries. We affirm the decision of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Brandon O. Gibson
Originating Judge:Judge Donald E. Parish |
Henry County | Court of Appeals | 12/30/14 | |
Cedric Jones, Sr. v. State Farm Fire & Casualty
M2014-00208-COA-R3-CV
Suit for breach of contract to recover on a homeowners policy for losses sustained when policyholder’s home was allegedly burglarized and was allegedly damaged as a result of a storm. Upon defendant’s motion, the trial court granted summary judgment, holding that the insurance company defendant had demonstrated that policyholder could not meet his burden of proof as to any of his claims. After a thorough review of the record, we discern no error and affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Richard H. Dinkins
Originating Judge:Chancellor Russell T. Perkins |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 12/30/14 | |
Antonio Williams v. State of Tennessee
E2014-00419-CCA-R3-PC
Antonio Williams (“the Petitioner”) pleaded guilty to three counts of possession with intent to sell a Schedule II controlled substance within a drug-free zone and agreed to a revocation of probation on a prior sentence. Pursuant to his plea agreement, the Petitioner received a total effective sentence of ten years to be served at 100%. In this appeal from the denial of post-conviction relief, the Petitioner contends that the post-conviction court erred in finding: (1) that his plea was intelligently and voluntarily made; and (2) that trial counsel’s performance was not deficient. After a thorough review of the record and the applicable law, we affirm the judgment of the post-conviction court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Robert L. Holloway, Jr.
Originating Judge:Judge Mary B. Leibowitz |
Knox County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 12/30/14 | |
State of Tennessee v. Angel Geovanna Hurtado
M2014-00180-CCA-R3-CD
The Defendant, Angel Geovanna Hurtado, was convicted by a Davidson County jury of three counts of aggravated child abuse, one count of reckless aggravated assault as a lesser-included offense of aggravated child abuse, and one count of aggravated child neglect. The trial court imposed an effective sentence of twenty-five years for her convictions. In this direct appeal, the Defendant contends that (1) the trial court committed plain error by failing to grant a mistrial given the “significant problems that arose during trial revealing the existence of potential new witnesses and exculpatory evidence”; (2) the trial court erred by permitting the State to elicit testimony about and argue that evidence of domestic violence established the Defendant’s guilty knowledge, under a theory of criminal responsibility, of the child abuse and neglect of the victim by her live-in boyfriend; and (3) the evidence was insufficient to support the convictions, including a challenge of material variance between the proof and the State’s election of offenses. Following our review of the record and the applicable authorities, the judgments of the trial court are affirmed. However, we must remand for entry of a corrected judgment in count two to reflect the proper conviction of reckless aggravated assault.
Authoring Judge: Judge D. Kelly Thomas, Jr.
Originating Judge:Judge Mark J. Fishburn |
Davidson County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 12/30/14 | |
In Re Bryce F.
E2014-01380-COA-R3-PT
The State of Tennessee Department of Children’s Services (“DCS”) filed a petition seeking to terminate the parental rights of Lori D.F.P. (“Mother”) to the minor child Bryce F. (“the Child”). After a trial the Juvenile Court for Knox County (“the Juvenile Court”) terminated Mother’s parental rights to the Child after finding and holding, inter alia, that grounds had been proven by clear and convincing evidence to terminate Mother’s parental rights for abandonment by willful failure to pay child support pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1- 113(g)(1) and Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-102(1)(A)(i); for failure to substantially comply with the permanency plan pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(g)(2); and for severe child abuse pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(g)(4), and that the termination was in the Child’s best interest. Mother appeals to this Court. We find that the evidence does not preponderate against the Juvenile Court’s findings made by clear and convincing evidence, and we affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge D. Michael Swiney
Originating Judge:Judge Tim Irwin |
Knox County | Court of Appeals | 12/30/14 | |
Mike Settle v. Brenda Jones, Warden
W2014-01362-CCA-R3-HC
The petitioner, Mike Settle, appeals from the denial of his sixth petition for writ of habeas corpus, which challenged his 2001 guilty-pleaded convictions of felony escape, especially aggravated kidnapping, aggravated robbery, and two counts of aggravated assault. Discerning no error, we affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge James Curwood Witt Jr.
Originating Judge:Judge Joseph Walker |
Lauderdale County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 12/30/14 | |
Susan Sirbaugh v. Vanderbilt University, d/b/a Vanderbilt University Medical Center, et al.
M2014-00153-COA-R9-CV
The plaintiff in this interlocutory appeal filed a complaint asserting health care liability claims against the original defendants, at which time she included a certificate of good faith in accordance with Tennessee Code Annotated section 29-26-122. The original defendants asserted comparative fault against non-party health care providers. The plaintiff waived compliance by the original defendants with section 29-26-122(b), which required the defendants to file a certificate of good faith regarding the non-party health care providers. The plaintiff thereafter amended her complaint to add the named non-party health care providers as new defendants but did not file a new certificate of good faith. The new defendants moved to dismiss the amended complaint. The trial court denied the motions and granted this interlocutory appeal. We reverse.
Authoring Judge: Judge John W. McClarty
Originating Judge:Judge Hamilton V. Gayden, Jr. |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 12/30/14 | |
State of Tennessee v. Boyce Turner
E2013-02304-CCA-R3-CD
The Defendant, Boyce Turner, was indicted by the Washington County Grand Jury on two counts of driving under the influence (“DUI”), two counts of DUI 4th offense, evading arrest, resisting arrest, and driving on a revoked license. The Defendant refused law enforcement’s request to submit to a blood test to determine his blood alcohol content, and his blood was taken, without a warrant and over his objections, pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated section 55-10-406(f)(2) (2012). The trial court subsequently granted the Defendant’s motion to suppress evidence of his blood alcohol content test, concluding that the Defendant’s Fourth Amendment rights were violated. In this appeal, the State argues that the trial court erred in granting the Defendant’s motion to suppress because the Defendant consented to the test by driving on the roads in Tennessee and exigent circumstances justified the warrantless search. Upon our review of the record, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Camille R. McMullen
Originating Judge:Judge Stacy L. Street |
Washington County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 12/30/14 | |
State of Tennessee v. Katius J. Williams
W2013-02542-CCA-R3-CD
The Defendant, Katius J. Williams, was indicted on one count each of aggravated burglary, aggravated rape, and aggravated robbery. See Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 39-13-402, -13-502, -14-403. Following a jury trial, the Defendant was convicted of aggravated burglary, aggravated rape, and the lesser-included offense of theft of property valued at $500 or less. See Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 39-14-103, -105. The trial court sentenced the Defendant as a Range II, multiple offender to an effective forty-year sentence. On appeal, the Defendant contends (1) that the evidence was insufficient to sustain his convictions; (2) that the trial court erred by making “no findings as to why maximum sentences were appropriate”; and (3) that the total effective sentence was excessive. Following our review, we affirm the judgments of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge D. Kelly Thomas
Originating Judge:Judge Russell Lee Moore, Jr. |
Dyer County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 12/30/14 | |
Marcus Terry aka Marcus Benson aka Torian Benson v. State of Tennessee
W2014-00684-CCA-R3-ECN
The pro se petitioner, Marcus Terry aka Marcus Benson aka Torian Benson, appeals the summary dismissal of his petition for writ of error coram nobis, which petition challenged his 1997 Shelby County Criminal Court guilty-pleaded conviction of escape. Discerning no error, we affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge James Curwood Witt Jr.
Originating Judge:Judge Chris Craft |
Shelby County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 12/30/14 | |
Bryan Dewayne Clark v. Jennifer Inez Clark
M2013-02632-COA-R3-CV
This appeal arises from divorced parents’ child custody dispute. After Mother was arrested twice for driving under the influence, Father requested that he be designated as the primary residential parent and that Mother have supervised parenting time only. Without making any specific factual findings, the trial court found that there had been a “substantial and material change in circumstances” since the prior custody order, and the trial court designated Father as the primary residential parent. Mother’s parenting time was decreased by 196 days, her decision-making authoritywas removed, and she was ordered to pay child support to Father. Because the trial court’s order fails to comply with Tennessee Rule of Civil Procedure 52.01, we vacate the trial court’s judgment and remand.
Authoring Judge: Judge W. Neal McBrayer
Originating Judge:Chancellor Tom E. Gray |
Sumner County | Court of Appeals | 12/30/14 | |
State of Tennessee v. Albert Jackson
W2014-00050-CCA-R3-CD
The defendant, Albert Jackson, was convicted by a Shelby County Criminal Court jury of attempted voluntary manslaughter, a Class D felony; aggravated assault, a Class C felony; employing a firearm during the commission of a felony, a Class C felony; reckless endangerment with a deadly weapon, a Class E felony; and felon in possession of a handgun, a Class E felony. He was sentenced to an effective term of twenty-four years in the Tennessee Department of Correction. On appeal, he challenges the sufficiency of the convicting evidence. After review, we affirm the judgments of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Alan E. Glenn
Originating Judge:Judge W. Mark Ward |
Shelby County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 12/30/14 | |
Frederick O. Edwards v. State of Tennessee
W2014-01463-CCA-R3-CO
The Petitioner, Frederick O. Edwards, appeals the Weakley County Circuit Court’s summary dismissal of his motion to correct an illegal sentence pursuant to Tennessee Rule of Criminal Procedure 36.1. The Petitioner contends that the trial court erred by treating his Rule 36.1 motion as a petition for post-conviction relief and further asserts that he has presented a colorable claim for relief. We agree that the trial court’s treatment of the Petitioner’s motion to correct an illegal sentence as a petition for post-conviction relief was error, but because we conclude that the Petitioner has not presented a colorable claim, the trial court’s order denying relief is affirmed.
Authoring Judge: Judge D. Kelly Thomas
Originating Judge:Judge William B. Acree |
Weakley County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 12/30/14 | |
Leon Dickson, Sr. v. Sidney H. Kriger, M.D.
W2013-02830-COA-R3-CV
Patient brought a health care liability action against his eye surgeon, alleging that the surgeon’s negligence in performing a LASIK procedure resulted in several eye injuries. The trial court granted a directed verdict for the surgeon, finding the patient failed to present evidence establishing the standard of care and causation. Because we find the evidence was sufficient to create an issue for the jury, we reverse and remand to the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge W. Neal McBrayer
Originating Judge:Judge James F. Russell |
Shelby County | Court of Appeals | 12/30/14 | |
Metropolitan Government of Nashville, et al. v. Robert W. Donaldson, Jr.
M2013-02605-COA-R3-CV
Defendant appeals a judgment holding that he ran a stop sign, contending that the court did not have subjectmatter or in personam jurisdiction over the matter, and that the Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County lacked standing to bring the action. We affirm the decision of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Richard H. Dinkins
Originating Judge:Judge Hamilton V. Gayden, Jr. |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 12/30/14 | |
State of Tennessee v. Andrew Barry Diebold
W2014-00466-CCA-R3-CD
The defendant, Andrew Barry Diebold, entered pleas of guilty to possession of marijuana with the intent to manufacture, deliver, or sell and possession of drug paraphernalia. He was sentenced, respectively, to two years as a standard offender, to serve ninety days, with one year and nine months of unsupervised probation, and to ninety days at 75%. As a condition of his pleas, he reserved as a certified question if the warrantless search of his backpack by a law enforcement officer was illegal. The search was made by the defendant’s father, who was a lieutenant with the Brownsville Police Department, as the backpack was in the passenger side of the father’s truck, which the defendant had been operating. We conclude that the certified question is not dispositive of the case and, therefore, dismiss the appeal.
Authoring Judge: Judge Alan E. Glenn
Originating Judge:Judge Clayburn Peeples |
Haywood County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 12/30/14 | |
Thomas Fleming Mabry v. Board of Professional Responsibility Of The Supreme Court Of Tennessee
E2013-01549-SC-R3-BP
A hearing panel of the Board of Professional Responsibility determined that an attorney failed to act diligently in his representation of a client and suspended the attorney from the practice of law for forty-five days. The trial court affirmed the suspension. After careful consideration, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Chief Justice Sharon G. Lee
Originating Judge:Judge Don R. Ash |
Knox County | Supreme Court | 12/30/14 | |
Aurora Loan Services, LLC v. Yvette D. Woody, et al.
W2014-00761-COA-R3-CV
In this detainer action, the trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the loan servicing company. Discerning no error, we affirm.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge J. Steven Stafford
Originating Judge:Judge Donna M. Fields |
Shelby County | Court of Appeals | 12/30/14 | |
Chad Seigmund v. Bellsouth Telecommunications, LLC, et al
M2014-00234-SC-R3-WC
In December 2011, Chad Seigmund (“Employee”) was involved in a motor vehicle accident in the course of his employment. His employer, Bellsouth Telecommunications, LLC (“Employer”) provided medical treatment but denied that Employee sustained permanent impairment or disability. Following a trial, the trial court found that Employee had sustained permanent disability and awarded Employee 16.5% permanent partial disability to the body as a whole. Employer has appealed, contending that the evidence preponderates against the permanent disabilityfinding. In accordance with Tennessee Supreme Court Rule 51, the appeal has been referred to the Special Workers’ Compensation Appeals Panel for a hearing and a report of findings of fact and conclusions of law. After a thorough review of the record and the applicable law, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Justice Jeffrey S. Bivins
Originating Judge:Chancellor Vanessa Jackson |
Coffee County | Workers Compensation Panel | 12/30/14 | |
State of Tennessee v. Edward Carter
W2014-00538-CCA-R3-CD
The Defendant-Appellant, Edward Carter, was convicted by a Madison County jury of attempted theft of property valued at more than $500 but less than $1,000, a Class A misdemeanor. The trial court ordered the Defendant to serve 11 months and 29 days in the county jail, suspended to community corrections. The sole issue presented for our review is whether the evidence is sufficient to support the conviction. Upon review, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Camille R. McMullen
Originating Judge:Judge Roy B. Morgan, Jr. |
Madison County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 12/30/14 |