State of Tennessee v. William Darelle Smith
M2014-00059-CCA-R3-CD
A jury convicted the defendant, William Darelle Smith, of first degree (premeditated) murder, and he was sentenced to life in prison. On appeal, this court affirmed the denial of the motion for a new trial. The defendant appealed a single issue to the Tennessee Supreme Court: that his right to an impartial jury was compromised because the trial court did not hold a hearing after the discovery, during jury deliberations, that a juror was not only acquainted with one of the State’s witnesses but had sent the witness a communication through Facebook complimenting her on her testimony. The Tennessee Supreme Court concluded that the trial court had erred in refusing to hold a hearing and remanded the case. After a hearing during which the juror and the witness testified regarding the nature of both their relationship and the communication, the trial court again denied the defendant a new trial. The defendant appeals. We conclude that the State sufficiently rebutted any presumption of prejudice raised by the juror’s extrajudicial communication or by his concealment of his acquaintance with the witness, and accordingly we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge John Everett Williams
Originating Judge:Judge Seth W. Norman |
Davidson County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 01/07/15 | |
Jerterrius Marshawn Akridge Et Al. v. Fathom, Inc. et al.
E2014-00711-COA-R9-CV
This is an interlocutory appeal regarding the trial court’s denial of the defendants’ motions for summary judgment. The plaintiffs filed this lawsuit following a shooting that occurred on December 24, 2011, outside Club Fathom in Chattanooga, a youth outreach ministry operated by two of the defendants. The defendants moved for summary judgment. The trial court denied their motions, and the defendants sought and were granted an interlocutory appeal. We determine that the court erred in failing to grant summary judgment to the defendants regarding the plaintiffs’ negligence claims. We therefore reverse the judgment of the trial court. We remand the case for entry of summary judgment regarding the plaintiffs’ negligence claims and for a determination regarding the remaining lease issue.
Authoring Judge: Judge Thomas R. Frierson, II
Originating Judge:Judge Jacqueline S. Bolton |
Hamilton County | Court of Appeals | 01/07/15 | |
Steven Rezba v. Michael Rezba
M2014-00553-COA-R3-CV
Father brought suit against Son in general sessions court for repayment of certain alleged debts. After Father’s case was dismissed, he appealed to circuit court, which also dismissed Father’s claims after a trial. Based on the record on appeal, sufficient facts exist to support the trial court’s determination, and the decision of the trial court is affirmed.
Authoring Judge: Judge Brandon O. Gibson
Originating Judge:James G. Martin, III |
Williamson County | Court of Appeals | 01/07/15 | |
Susan Anne Ogles v. Thomas Wayne Ogles
M2013-02215-COA-R3-CV
This is an appeal from a three-day divorce trial. The trial court classified and valued the parties’ assets and divided the marital estate. The court awarded the wife $2,000 per month in transitional alimony for a period of 14 months, and it denied the parties’ requests for attorney’s fees. The wife appeals, challenging the trial court’s classification and valuation of certain assets, the alimony award, and the trial court’s decision to deny her request for attorney’s fees. Discerning no error, we affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge Brandon O. Gibson
Originating Judge:Judge L. Craig Johnson |
Coffee County | Court of Appeals | 01/07/15 | |
Mark Miller v. Annie Miller
M2014-00281-COA-R3-CV
Plaintiff/Appellee Mark Andrew Miller (“Father”) filed a petition for contempt against Defendant/Appellant Annie Elizabeth Miller(“Mother”). After conducting a hearing, the trial court found Mother guilty of two counts of criminal contempt. Mother appealed asserting that the trial court lacked jurisdiction over the matter or, alternatively, that the evidence did not support a finding that she acted willfully. Although we conclude that the trialcourthad jurisdiction to adjudicate Father’s petition for contempt,we agree with Mother that the contempt convictions should be overturned. We reverse.
Authoring Judge: Judge Arnold B. Goldin
Originating Judge:Judge Phillip R. Robinson |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 01/07/15 | |
In Re Brian M et al.
E2014-00941-COA-R3-PT
This is a termination of parental rights appeal brought by the incarcerated father. The trial court found clear and convincing evidence to support termination of the father’s parental rights on the statutory grounds of abandonment and confinement under a sentence of ten years or more. The court further found that termination of the father’s parental rights was in the best interest of the children. The father appeals. We affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge John W. McClarty
Originating Judge:Judge Timothy E. Irwin |
Knox County | Court of Appeals | 01/06/15 | |
Grover Cowart v. State of Tennessee
E2014-00700-CCA-R3-CD
The Petitioner, Grover D. Cowart, appeals the habeas corpus court’s summary dismissal of his petition for writ of habeas corpus, or, in the alternative, motion to correct an illegal sentence pursuant to Tennessee Rule of Criminal Procedure 36.1. On appeal, the Petitioner contends that (1) the judgments of conviction in Case No. 50934 are void; (2) the judgment of conviction in Count 1 of Case No. 50934 is too “indefinite nd ambiguous” to run consecutively to his conviction in Case No. 49900; (3) the judgments of conviction in Counts 2 and 3 in Case No. 50934 are too “indefinite, uncertain, and ambiguous” to run consecutively to Count 4 in Case No. 49900; and (4) the sentences in Case No. 50934 are expired. Discerning no error, we affirm the summary dismissal of the Petitioner’s petition.
Authoring Judge: Judge D. Kelly Thomas, Jr.
Originating Judge:Judge Mary Beth Leibowitz |
Knox County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 01/05/15 | |
Lori Kay Jones Trigg v. Richard Darrell Trigg
E2014-00860-COA-R3-CV
This is an irreconcilable differences divorce case. The trial court entered a final judgment of divorce that incorporated the parties’ mediated marital dissolution agreement. Shortly thereafter, Husband filed a motion to set aside or to alter or amend the final judgment, claiming he was under duress when he entered into the marital dissolution agreement and also claiming that the trial court was required to conduct a hearing before entering the final judgment. The trial court disagreed and denied Husband’s motion. We affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge J. Steven Stafford
Originating Judge:Judge Thomas J. Wright |
Hawkins County | Court of Appeals | 01/05/15 | |
Sarah Elizabeth Adams v. State of Tennessee
W2014-00540-SC-R3-WC
An employee injured her shoulder while working for her employer and failed to make a meaningful return to work. The Claims Commission awarded the employee 55% permanent partial disability. The employer appealed, arguing that the award is excessive 1 because the Commissioner erred in assessing an 11% anatomical impairment rating and in applying a five times multiplier. We modify the Commissioner’s judgment, and affirm as modified.
Authoring Judge: Justice Holly M. Kirby
Originating Judge:Nancy C. Miller-Herron, Commissioner |
Workers Compensation Panel | 01/05/15 | ||
State of Tennessee v. William Bryan Gatlin
M2013-02440-CCA-R3-CD
The Defendant, William Bryan Gatlin, was convicted by a Marshall County Circuit Court jury of possession of marijuana with the intent to sell and possession of marijuana with the intent to deliver, Class E felonies, and possession of drug paraphernalia, a Class A misdemeanor. See T.C.A. §§ 39-17-417(a)(4) (possession of a controlled substance) (Supp. 2012) (amended 2014), 39-17-425 (possession of drug paraphernalia) (2014). The trial court merged the possession of marijuana convictions. The Defendant was sentenced to serve two years for the merged possession of marijuana conviction and eleven months, twenty-nine days for possession of drug paraphernalia. The sentences were imposed consecutively to each other and to any unexpired sentence. On appeal, the Defendant contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence obtained during a knock-and-talk encounter and a warrantless entry into his apartment and that the judgments should be reversed because without the illegally obtained evidence, the remaining evidence is insufficient to support his convictions. We affirm the judgments of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Robert H. Montgomery, Jr.
Originating Judge:Judge F. Lee Russell |
Marshall County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 01/02/15 | |
Cathy Turnbo Franks v. Ronald Franks
W2014-00429-COA-R3-CV
This appeal involves various financial issues relative to a divorce. Husband appeals the trial court’s determination of several factual findings relative to alimony, including Wife’s ability to secure employment, Husband’s ability to earn in the future, the award of attorney’s fees to Wife, and the value of several marital assets divided in the property division, including the value of an LLC jointly owned by the parties. Wife also appeals the trial court’s determination of value and the division of the parties’ joint interest in the LLC, which the trial court awarded to Husband without assigning a value. We vacate the judgment of the trial court and remand for appropriate findings of fact and conclusions of law.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge J. Steven Stafford
Originating Judge:Judge James Y. Ross |
Court of Appeals | 01/02/15 | ||
Marcus Terry aka Marcus Benson aka Torian Benson v. State of Tennessee
W2014-00684-CCA-R3-ECN
The pro se petitioner, Marcus Terry aka Marcus Benson aka Torian Benson, appeals the summary dismissal of his petition for writ of error coram nobis, which petition challenged his 1997 Shelby County Criminal Court guilty-pleaded conviction of escape. Discerning no error, we affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge James Curwood Witt Jr.
Originating Judge:Judge Chris Craft |
Shelby County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 12/30/14 | |
Bryan Dewayne Clark v. Jennifer Inez Clark
M2013-02632-COA-R3-CV
This appeal arises from divorced parents’ child custody dispute. After Mother was arrested twice for driving under the influence, Father requested that he be designated as the primary residential parent and that Mother have supervised parenting time only. Without making any specific factual findings, the trial court found that there had been a “substantial and material change in circumstances” since the prior custody order, and the trial court designated Father as the primary residential parent. Mother’s parenting time was decreased by 196 days, her decision-making authoritywas removed, and she was ordered to pay child support to Father. Because the trial court’s order fails to comply with Tennessee Rule of Civil Procedure 52.01, we vacate the trial court’s judgment and remand.
Authoring Judge: Judge W. Neal McBrayer
Originating Judge:Chancellor Tom E. Gray |
Sumner County | Court of Appeals | 12/30/14 | |
State of Tennessee v. Albert Jackson
W2014-00050-CCA-R3-CD
The defendant, Albert Jackson, was convicted by a Shelby County Criminal Court jury of attempted voluntary manslaughter, a Class D felony; aggravated assault, a Class C felony; employing a firearm during the commission of a felony, a Class C felony; reckless endangerment with a deadly weapon, a Class E felony; and felon in possession of a handgun, a Class E felony. He was sentenced to an effective term of twenty-four years in the Tennessee Department of Correction. On appeal, he challenges the sufficiency of the convicting evidence. After review, we affirm the judgments of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Alan E. Glenn
Originating Judge:Judge W. Mark Ward |
Shelby County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 12/30/14 | |
Frederick O. Edwards v. State of Tennessee
W2014-01463-CCA-R3-CO
The Petitioner, Frederick O. Edwards, appeals the Weakley County Circuit Court’s summary dismissal of his motion to correct an illegal sentence pursuant to Tennessee Rule of Criminal Procedure 36.1. The Petitioner contends that the trial court erred by treating his Rule 36.1 motion as a petition for post-conviction relief and further asserts that he has presented a colorable claim for relief. We agree that the trial court’s treatment of the Petitioner’s motion to correct an illegal sentence as a petition for post-conviction relief was error, but because we conclude that the Petitioner has not presented a colorable claim, the trial court’s order denying relief is affirmed.
Authoring Judge: Judge D. Kelly Thomas
Originating Judge:Judge William B. Acree |
Weakley County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 12/30/14 | |
Leon Dickson, Sr. v. Sidney H. Kriger, M.D.
W2013-02830-COA-R3-CV
Patient brought a health care liability action against his eye surgeon, alleging that the surgeon’s negligence in performing a LASIK procedure resulted in several eye injuries. The trial court granted a directed verdict for the surgeon, finding the patient failed to present evidence establishing the standard of care and causation. Because we find the evidence was sufficient to create an issue for the jury, we reverse and remand to the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge W. Neal McBrayer
Originating Judge:Judge James F. Russell |
Shelby County | Court of Appeals | 12/30/14 | |
Metropolitan Government of Nashville, et al. v. Robert W. Donaldson, Jr.
M2013-02605-COA-R3-CV
Defendant appeals a judgment holding that he ran a stop sign, contending that the court did not have subjectmatter or in personam jurisdiction over the matter, and that the Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County lacked standing to bring the action. We affirm the decision of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Richard H. Dinkins
Originating Judge:Judge Hamilton V. Gayden, Jr. |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 12/30/14 | |
State of Tennessee v. Andrew Barry Diebold
W2014-00466-CCA-R3-CD
The defendant, Andrew Barry Diebold, entered pleas of guilty to possession of marijuana with the intent to manufacture, deliver, or sell and possession of drug paraphernalia. He was sentenced, respectively, to two years as a standard offender, to serve ninety days, with one year and nine months of unsupervised probation, and to ninety days at 75%. As a condition of his pleas, he reserved as a certified question if the warrantless search of his backpack by a law enforcement officer was illegal. The search was made by the defendant’s father, who was a lieutenant with the Brownsville Police Department, as the backpack was in the passenger side of the father’s truck, which the defendant had been operating. We conclude that the certified question is not dispositive of the case and, therefore, dismiss the appeal.
Authoring Judge: Judge Alan E. Glenn
Originating Judge:Judge Clayburn Peeples |
Haywood County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 12/30/14 | |
Thomas Fleming Mabry v. Board of Professional Responsibility Of The Supreme Court Of Tennessee
E2013-01549-SC-R3-BP
A hearing panel of the Board of Professional Responsibility determined that an attorney failed to act diligently in his representation of a client and suspended the attorney from the practice of law for forty-five days. The trial court affirmed the suspension. After careful consideration, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Chief Justice Sharon G. Lee
Originating Judge:Judge Don R. Ash |
Knox County | Supreme Court | 12/30/14 | |
Aurora Loan Services, LLC v. Yvette D. Woody, et al.
W2014-00761-COA-R3-CV
In this detainer action, the trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the loan servicing company. Discerning no error, we affirm.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge J. Steven Stafford
Originating Judge:Judge Donna M. Fields |
Shelby County | Court of Appeals | 12/30/14 | |
Chad Seigmund v. Bellsouth Telecommunications, LLC, et al
M2014-00234-SC-R3-WC
In December 2011, Chad Seigmund (“Employee”) was involved in a motor vehicle accident in the course of his employment. His employer, Bellsouth Telecommunications, LLC (“Employer”) provided medical treatment but denied that Employee sustained permanent impairment or disability. Following a trial, the trial court found that Employee had sustained permanent disability and awarded Employee 16.5% permanent partial disability to the body as a whole. Employer has appealed, contending that the evidence preponderates against the permanent disabilityfinding. In accordance with Tennessee Supreme Court Rule 51, the appeal has been referred to the Special Workers’ Compensation Appeals Panel for a hearing and a report of findings of fact and conclusions of law. After a thorough review of the record and the applicable law, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Justice Jeffrey S. Bivins
Originating Judge:Chancellor Vanessa Jackson |
Coffee County | Workers Compensation Panel | 12/30/14 | |
State of Tennessee v. Edward Carter
W2014-00538-CCA-R3-CD
The Defendant-Appellant, Edward Carter, was convicted by a Madison County jury of attempted theft of property valued at more than $500 but less than $1,000, a Class A misdemeanor. The trial court ordered the Defendant to serve 11 months and 29 days in the county jail, suspended to community corrections. The sole issue presented for our review is whether the evidence is sufficient to support the conviction. Upon review, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Camille R. McMullen
Originating Judge:Judge Roy B. Morgan, Jr. |
Madison County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 12/30/14 | |
Aimee Lorraine Howell v. Clint Austin Howell
M2013-02260-COA-R3-CV
In this divorce action, Father appeals the rehabilitative alimony and alimony in solido awarded to Mother, the amount of parenting time he received, the designation of Mother as sole decision-maker and the failure of the trial court to find that Mother was voluntarily underemployed. We affirm the award of rehabilitative alimony and alimony in solido and the designation of Mother as primary residential parent; we vacate and remand for further consideration the residential parenting schedule,the allocation of decision-making authority, and the determination of Mother’s income.
Authoring Judge: Judge Richard H. Dinkins
Originating Judge:Chancellor Tom E. Gray |
Sumner County | Court of Appeals | 12/30/14 | |
Alicia Shane Lovera v. State of Tennessee
W2014-00794-CCA-R3-HC
In 1996, the Petitioner, Alicia Shayne Lovera, was found guilty by a jury of first degree premeditated murder of her husband. On the morning of the sentencing hearing in which the State was seeking a sentence of life without the possibility of parole, the Petitioner agreed to plead guilty to first degree premeditated murder in return for a sentence of life with the possibility of parole. In March 1999, the Petitioner filed a petition for post-conviction relief. Following a hearing, the trial court denied relief, and the Petitioner appealed. This Court affirmed the trial court’s denial of post-conviction relief. On December 19, 2013, the Petitioner filed a writ of habeas corpus alleging the judgment of conviction was void on its face because it was entered upon her plea of guilty after she had been found guilty by a jury. The habeas corpus court dismissed the petition without an evidentiary hearing for failure to state a claim. After a thorough review of the record, we affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge Robert L. Holloway Jr.
Originating Judge:Judge John W. Campbell |
Shelby County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 12/30/14 | |
Dietrich Hill, et al. v. City of Memphis, et al
W2013-02307-COA-R3-CV
This case arises out of an investigation by the Memphis police department of a business suspected of selling illegal inhalants. The business owner was arrested and charged with the criminal sale of inhalants. The police seized bank accounts belonging to the owner and two corporations related to the business and instituted forfeiture proceedings regarding the funds in those accounts. The bank account owner and the two corporations filed suit against the city and multiple police officers seeking damages pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 42 U.S.C. § 1988. The trial court granted the city’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. In denying the plaintiff’s motion to alter or amend, the trial court stated that the amended complaint failed to allege any Fourth or Fifth Amendment violations, the grounds upon which the plaintiffs sought relief. With respect to the only remaining individual defendant, the trial court denied the plaintiffs’ motion to amend the first amended complaint, holding, in part, that the existence of adequate post-deprivation remedies precluded any Fourth or Fifth Amendment claims. We affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge Andy D. Bennett
Originating Judge:Judge Kenny W. Armstrong |
Shelby County | Court of Appeals | 12/30/14 |