Alvin Hayes v. Sharp Transport Co. and Cherokee Insurance Co.
M2013-00932-WC-R3-WC
In accordance with Tennessee Supreme Court Rule 51, this workers’ compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers’ Compensation Appeals Panel for a hearing and a report of findings of fact and conclusions of law. Employee suffered compensable injuries to his lower back and right shoulder. Employer asserted that the permanent disability award for employee’s injury should be capped at one and one half times his impairment rating because employee had voluntarily resigned. Following a bench trial the trial court found that the statutory cap of one and one half times did not apply to employee’s permanent partial disability benefits because employee’s retirement was reasonably related to his workplace injury and therefore he did not have a meaningful return to work. Based on an impairment rating of eleven percent the trial court awarded 35 percent permanent partial disability benefits. We find there was a meaningful return to work and accordingly we reverse the trial court judgment.
Authoring Judge: Special Judge E. Riley Anderson
Originating Judge:Chancellor Stella Hargrove |
Lawrence County | Workers Compensation Panel | 02/20/14 | |
State of Tennessee v. Larry McNutt
W2012-02114-CCA-R3-CD
A Shelby County jury found the Defendant, Larry McNutt, guilty of reckless endangerment and aggravated assault. The trial court merged the two convictions and ordered the Defendant to serve an effective fifteen-year sentence as a Career Offender. On appeal, the Defendant claims that: (1) the State solicited unfairly prejudicial testimony in violation of a pretrial ruling; (2) the trial court improperly admitted hearsay evidence; (3) the trial court improperly precluded the defense from cross-examining the victim about his desire not to prosecute the Defendant; (4) the trial court improperly admitted evidence of the defense witness’s prior convictions; (5) there is insufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdict; (6) his sentence is excessive; and (7) the cumulative effect of these errors violates his due process rights. After a thorough review of the record and applicable law, we affirm the trial court’s judgments and remand for correction of the reckless endangerment judgment form.
Authoring Judge: Judge Robert W. Wedemeyer
Originating Judge:Judge W. Otis Higgs Jr. |
Shelby County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 02/20/14 | |
State of Tennessee v. Curtis Word
M2013-01282-CCA-R3-CD
The Defendant, Curtis Word, challenges the trial court’s sentence of incarceration, alleging that nothing in the record overcame the presumption that he was a favorable candidate for alternative sentencing and requesting that this court place him on probation or community corrections. Upon consideration of the applicable authorities and the record, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge D. Kelly Thomas, Jr.
Originating Judge:Judge Robert Crigler |
Moore County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 02/20/14 | |
State of Tennessee v. William Avery McKnight
M2013-01423-CCA-R3-CD
The Defendant, William Avery McKnight, pleaded guilty to aggravated burglary and theft of property over $1000, with the trial court to determine the length and manner of the sentences. The trial court ordered the Defendant to serve an effective sentence of eight years in the Tennessee Department of Correction. The Defendant appeals, asserting that the trial court erred when it denied his request for alternative sentencing. After a thorough review of the record and applicable law, we affirm the trial court’s judgments.
Authoring Judge: Judge Robert W. Wedemeyer
Originating Judge:Judge Robert Crigler |
Marshall County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 02/20/14 | |
State of Tennessee v. Jewell Wayne Smith, Jr.
M2013-01573-CCA-R3-CD
Jewell Wayne Smith, Jr. (“the Defendant”) entered a best interest plea to voluntary manslaughter. Following a sentencing hearing, the trial court sentenced the Defendant to thirteen years’ incarceration. The trial court ordered this sentence to run consecutively to a sentence the Defendant received for a probation violation. On appeal, the Defendant argues that the length of his sentence in this case is excessive. After a thorough review of the record and the applicable law, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Jeffrey S. Bivins
Originating Judge:Judge Michael R. Jones |
Robertson County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 02/20/14 | |
In Re: Jacob C.H. and Lillianna J.H.
E2013-00587-COA-R3-PT
George H. (“Father”) and Hollie H. (“Stepmother”) filed a petition seeking to terminate the parental rights of Wendy H. (“Mother”) to the minor children Jacob C. H. and Lillianna J. H. (“the Children”) and to allow Stepmother to adopt the Children. After a trial, the Trial Court entered its final order terminating Mother’s parental rights to the Children after finding and holding, inter alia, that clear and convincing evidence existed of grounds to terminate Mother’s parental rights to the Children pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(g)(1) and Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-102 for willful failure to visit and willful failure to support, and that clear and convincing evidence was proven that it was in the Children’s best interest for Mother’s parental rights to be terminated. Mother appeals the termination of her parental rights. We affirm the termination of Mother's parental rights to the Children.
Authoring Judge: Judge D. Michael Swiney
Originating Judge:Judge Lawrence H. Puckett |
McMinn County | Court of Appeals | 02/20/14 | |
Johnnie Hudson v. Pro Logistics, et al.
M2013-00387-WC-R3-WC
Pursuant to Tennessee Supreme Court Rule 51, this workers’ compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers’ Compensation Appeals Panel for a hearing and a report of findings of fact and conclusions of law. The trial court found the employee suffered compensable injuries to his neck and back stemming from a motor vehicle accident and awarded him 54% permanent partial disability to the body as a whole. The employer has appealed, asserting the trial court’s award is excessive. Having carefully reviewed the record, we reverse the trial court’s judgment with respect to the impairment to the cervical spine and affirm in all other respects.
Authoring Judge: Senior Judge Don R. Ash
Originating Judge:Chancellor Robert E. Corlew, III |
Rutherford County | Workers Compensation Panel | 02/20/14 | |
Derrick Rice v. State of Tennessee
W2013-00774-CCA-MR3-PC
The petitioner, Derrick Rice, appeals the Shelby County Criminal Court’s summary dismissal of his petition for post-conviction relief as untimely filed. Upon our review, we reverse the decision of the post-conviction court and remand for proceedings consistent with the Post-Conviction Procedure Act.
Authoring Judge: Judge James Curwood Witt Jr.
Originating Judge:Judge J. Robert Carter Jr. |
Shelby County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 02/20/14 | |
State of Tennessee v. Seymore S. Staten
M2012-01306-CCA-R3-CD
The Defendant, Seymore S. Staten, was convicted by a Williamson County Circuit Court jury of reckless aggravated assault, a Class D felony. See T.C.A. § 39-13-102 (2010). He was sentenced as a Range I, standard offender to three years’ confinement to be served consecutively to a previously imposed eighty-seven-month federal sentence. On appeal, the Defendant contends that (1) the evidence is insufficient to support his conviction and (2) his right to a speedy trial was violated. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Joseph M. Tipton
Originating Judge:Judge Robbie Beal |
Williamson County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 02/20/14 | |
State of Tennessee v. Cory Austin Edison
M2012-02205-CCA-R3-CD
The Defendant, Cory Austin Edison, challenges his jury conviction for aggravated robbery, a Class B felony, and his effective twenty-year sentence alleging prosecutorial misconduct in closing arguments; the admission of hearsay evidence without proper authentication at trial; and the improper imposition of consecutive sentencing. After reviewing the record and the relevant authorities, we conclude that the imposition of consecutive sentencing was not supported by the evidence and remand for a new sentencing hearing on that issue. The judgment of the trial court is, therefore, affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.
Authoring Judge: Judge D. Kelly Thomas, Jr.
Originating Judge:Judge Seth Norman |
Davidson County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 02/20/14 | |
Herschel V. Lillard, Jr. v. State of Tennessee
M2013-01406-CCA-R3-PC
The Petitioner, Herschel V. Lillard, Jr., appeals the Davidson County Criminal Court’s denial of his petition for post-conviction relief from his 2010 conviction for first degree felony murder and resulting life sentence. The Petitioner contends that the trial court erred by denying him relief because he received the ineffective assistance of counsel. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Joseph M. Tipton
Originating Judge:Judge Seth W. Norman |
Davidson County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 02/20/14 | |
Felix Tamayo v. State of Tennessee
M2013-01273-CCA-R3-PC
The Petitioner, Felix Tamayo, pled guilty to five counts of aggravated robbery and agreed to allow the trial court to determine the length and manner of service of his sentence. After a sentencing hearing, the trial court imposed consecutive twelve-year sentences for a total effective sentence of sixty years. On appeal, this Court affirmed the Petitioner’s sentence. State v. Felix Tamayo, No. M2010-00800-CCA-R3-CD, 2011 WL 1876315, at *1 (Tenn. Crim. App., at Nashville, May. 16, 2011), perm. app. denied (Tenn. Sept. 21, 2011). The Petitioner timely filed a petition seeking post-conviction relief on the basis that his guilty plea was not knowingly and voluntarily entered, which the post-conviction court denied after a hearing. The Petitioner appeals the post-conviction court’s denial, maintaining that his guilty pleas were not knowingly and voluntarily entered because he was not advised that he could receive consecutive sentencing. After a thorough review of the record, the briefs, and relevant authorities, we affirm the post-conviction court’s judgment.
Authoring Judge: Judge Robert W. Wedemeyer
Originating Judge:Judge Cheryl Blackburn |
Davidson County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 02/19/14 | |
Derrick Hodge v. State of Tennessee
E2013-01883-CCA-R3-PC
The petitioner, Derrick Hodge, filed in the Hamilton County Criminal Court a petition for post-conviction relief from his guilty plea to possession of less than .5 grams of cocaine with the intent to sell. The post-conviction court dismissed the petition because it was untimely. On appeal, the petitioner contends that the holdings in Missouri v. Frye, __ U.S. __, 132 S.Ct. 1399 (2012), and Lafler v. Cooper, __ U.S. __, 132 S. Ct. 1376 (2012), establish a new rule of law that is entitled to retroactive application to cases on collateral review. Upon review, we affirm the judgment of the post-conviction court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Norma McGee Ogle
Originating Judge:Judge Don W. Poole |
Hamilton County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 02/19/14 | |
State of Tennessee v. Astin D. Hill
W2012-02147-CCA-R3-CD
The Defendant, Astin D. Hill, contends that the trial court improperly (1) denied all forms of alternative sentencing in direct contravention of Tennessee Code Annotated section 40-35-122, which prohibits continuous confinement for non-violent property offenses, and (2) imposed consecutive sentencing based on its erroneous finding that the Defendant had an extensive criminal history. After a review of the record and the applicable authorities, we conclude that the trial court’s failure to follow the dictates of section 40-35-122 was in error and affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand the case for resentencing.
Authoring Judge: Judge D. Kelly Thomas
Originating Judge:Judge Donald H. Allen |
Madison County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 02/19/14 | |
State of Tennessee v. Ronald Lynn Cook
E2013-01441-CCA-R3-CD
The Defendant, Ronald Lynn Cook, pled guilty to six counts of forgery valued at less than $1,000, a Class E felony. See Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 39-14-105, -114. The trial court imposed an effective sentence of ten years to be served in confinement. In this appeal as of right, the Defendant contends that the trial court erred by imposing partial consecutive sentences. Following our review, we affirm the judgments of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge D. Kelly Thomas, Jr.
Originating Judge:Judge E. Shayne Sexton |
Union County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 02/19/14 | |
George Jones v. State of Tennessee
W2013-00684-CCA-R3-PC
The Petitioner, George Jones, contends that he received the ineffective assistance of counsel at trial, effectively depriving him of his constitutional right to counsel. Specifically, the Petitioner claims that trial counsel failed to do the following: investigate the facts of and adequately prepare for his case; prepare him for his trial testimony; and advise him of the potential consequences of his decision to testify. After a thorough review of the record and the applicable authorities, we discern no error and affirm the judgment of the post-conviction court.
Authoring Judge: Judge D. Kelly Thomas
Originating Judge:Judge Donald H. Allen |
Madison County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 02/19/14 | |
Demetrius Wynn v. State of Tennessee
E2013-01303-CCA-R3-PC
The petitioner, Demetrius Wynn, filed in the Knox County Criminal Court a petition for post-conviction relief from his guilty plea to possession of less than .5 grams of cocaine with the intent to sell. He alleged that his trial counsel was ineffective and that his guilty plea was not knowingly and voluntarily entered. The post-conviction court denied relief, and the petitioner appeals. Upon review, we affirm the judgment of the post-conviction court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Norma McGee Ogle
Originating Judge:Judge Steven W. Sword |
Knox County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 02/19/14 | |
State of Tennessee v. James Prindle
W2012-02285-CCA-R3-CD
A jury convicted James Prindle (“the Defendant”) of aggravated sexual battery, aggravated child abuse, aggravated child neglect, and filing a false offense report. After a sentencing hearing, the trial court ordered the Defendant to serve an effective term of twenty-two years’ incarceration. In this direct appeal, the Defendant contends that (1) the trial court erred in admitting certain evidence; (2) the trial court’s jury charge was erroneous; (3) the evidence was not sufficient to support his convictions; (4) the trial court should have remanded the case to juvenile court; and (5) his sentence is excessive. Upon our thorough review of the record and applicable law, we reverse the Defendant’s conviction of aggravated child neglect for lack of sufficient evidence. We affirm the remaining judgments of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Jeffrey S. Bivins
Originating Judge:Judge J. Robert Carter Jr. |
Shelby County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 02/19/14 | |
State of Tennessee v. Joey Walton
W2013-00655-CCA-R3-CD
The defendant, Joey Walton, was convicted by a Shelby County Criminal Court jury of aggravated rape, a Class A felony; false imprisonment, a Class A misdemeanor; aggravated sexual battery, a Class B felony; and especially aggravated kidnapping, a Class A felony. The trial court merged the false imprisonment count into the aggravated rape count and sentenced the defendant as a violent offender to twenty-two years for the aggravated rape conviction, fifteen years for the especially aggravated kidnapping conviction, and twelve years for the aggravated sexual battery conviction. The court ordered that the aggravated rape and aggravated sexual battery sentences be served concurrently to each other but consecutively to the especially aggravated kidnapping sentence, for an effective sentence of thirty-seven years at 100% in the Department of Correction. The defendant raises three issues on appeal: (1) whether the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress his statement to police; (2) whether the trial court properly admitted a police officer’s testimony about his conversation with the defendant; and (3) whether the evidence is sufficient to sustain his convictions. Following our review, we affirm the judgments of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Alan E. Glenn
Originating Judge:Judge J. Robert Carter Jr. |
Shelby County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 02/19/14 | |
Maryam Mubashir v. Mubashir Mahmood
E2013-00480-COA-R3-CV
This appeal arises from a divorce. Maryam Mubashir (“Wife”) sued Mubashir Mahmood (“Husband”) for divorce in the Chancery Court for Hamblen County (“the Trial Court”). The Trial Court granted the divorce. Husband appeals, raising numerous issues concerning parenting time, arrearages, and alimony. We modify the judgment of the Trial Court as it pertains to certain arrearages and Husband’s parenting time with the parties’ children. Otherwise, we affirm the judgment of the Trial Court.
Authoring Judge: D. Michael Swiney
Originating Judge:Chancellor Thomas R. Frierson, II |
Hamblen County | Court of Appeals | 02/19/14 | |
Jeremiah R. Key v. State of Tennessee
E2013-00744-CCA-R3-PC
Petitioner, Jeremiah R. Key, sought post-conviction relief from his guilty-pleaded convictions for aggravated robbery, second degree murder, and coercion of a witness. The post-conviction court denied relief after an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, petitioner raises the following issues: (1) ineffective assistance of counsel for failure to adequately communicate with petitioner; (2) ineffective assistance of counsel for failure to ensure that his guilty pleas were voluntarily entered; and (3) involuntariness of his guilty pleas. Following our review, we affirm the judgment of the post-conviction court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Roger A. Page
Originating Judge:Judge Jon Kerry Blackwood |
Knox County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 02/18/14 | |
David A. and Kasey H. v. Wand T.
M2013-01327-COA-R3-PT
This is a termination of parental rights case. Father’s parental rights were terminated on the ground of abandonment for willful failure to visit and willful failure to support. Because the trial court’s order terminating Father’s parental rights fails to set forth sufficient findings, we are unable to adequately address the issue of abandonment in this case. Accordingly, we vacate the judgment of the chancery court and we remand for entry of an order that sets forth sufficient findings of fact and conclusions of law regarding the termination of Father’s parental rights.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Alan E. Highers
Originating Judge:Chancellor Laurence M. McMillan, Jr. |
Robertson County | Court of Appeals | 02/18/14 | |
Keryl Fillers, as personal representative of the Estate of John J. Craig v. Dwight A. Collins, et al
E2013-01210-COA-R3-CV
This appeal involves Wife’s attempt to set aside a judgment entered against her relating to her failure to fulfill seven promissory notes. The trial court granted Wife’s motion to set aside, in part, affirming her liability for three of the seven notes but holding that Wife was not liable for the remaining notes. Wife appeals. We affirm the decision of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge John W. McClarty
Originating Judge:Chancellor Daryl R. Fansler |
Knox County | Court of Appeals | 02/18/14 | |
Priscilla Lee Slagle v. Lawrence Fred Slagle
E2013-01480-COA-R3-CV
Lawrence Fred Slagle (“Husband”) appeals the Trial Court’s finding that he has the ability to pay to purge his civil contempt. We find no error in the Trial Court’s determination that Husband failed to make a prima facie showing that he had an inability to pay the purge amount, and we affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge D. Michael Swiney
Originating Judge:Judge John R. Officer |
Cumberland County | Court of Appeals | 02/18/14 | |
State of Tennessee v. Jeffrey M. Forguson
M2013-00257-CCA-R3-CD
A Stewart County jury convicted the Defendant, Jeffrey M. Forguson, of sale of a schedule IV drug (Alprazolam) and sale of a Schedule III drug (Dihydrocodeinone). The trial court sentenced the Defendant to serve consecutive six-year sentences for an effective sentence of twelve years in the Tennessee Department of Correction. On appeal, the Defendant contends that: (1) the evidence is insufficient to sustain his convictions; (2) consecutive sentencing was improper in his case; and (3) the trial court could not properly fulfill its role as thirteenth juror. After a thorough review of the record and applicable law, we affirm the trial court’s judgments.
Authoring Judge: Judge Robert W. Wedemeyer
Originating Judge:Judge George C. Sexton |
Stewart County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 02/18/14 |