Ira Miles v. State of Tennessee
The Defendant, Ira Miles, brings this appeal from the trial court’s denial of post-conviction relief. The Defendant pled guilty to especially aggravated robbery and received an agreed sentence of seventeen years to be served at one hundred percent. In this appeal, he argues that he is entitled to post-conviction relief because he was denied the effective assistance of counsel during the course of his plea. We affirm the judgment of the trial court. |
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Terry Baker Smithson v. James Alvin Smithson, Jr.
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
In Re: J.J.C., D.M.C., S.J.B. vs. John Calabretta
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
State of Tennessee, ex.rel. Vikki Davis vs. John Davis
|
Haywood | Court of Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Kevin D. Guffey
The appellant, Kevin D. Guffey, pled guilty in the Hamilton County Criminal Court to driving under the influence (DUI), a Class A misdemeanor. The trial court sentenced the appellant to eleven months and twenty-nine days in the county workhouse, to be suspended after serving forty-eight hours, and imposed a fine in the amount of three hundred sixty dollars ($360). The trial court also suspended the appellant's driver's license for one year and ordered the appellant to attend "DUI school." Pursuant to the plea agreement, the appellant reserved the right to appeal a certified question of law challenging the trial court's denial of his motion to suppress. Upon review of the record and the parties' briefs, we affirm the judgment of the trial court. |
Hamilton | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Torrance Maurice Knight
The defendant pled guilty to three counts of aggravated assault, two counts of solicitation of a minor, four counts of indecent exposure, and possession of a dangerous weapon. He agreed to an effective five-year sentence, with the manner of service to be determined by the trial court. The defendant contends that the trial court erred in denying him an alternative sentence. We affirm the judgments of the trial court. |
Hamilton | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Charles R. Newman v. The City of Knoxville,
|
Knox | Workers Compensation Panel | |
W2002-03139-COA-R3-CV
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
W2003-00017-COA-R3-CV
|
Lauderdale | Court of Appeals | |
Nadia Coffer v. State of Tennessee
The petitioner, Nadia Coffer, appeals the lower court’s denial of her post-conviction relief petition. The petitioner originally entered guilty pleas in the Shelby County Criminal Court to especially aggravated kidnapping and attempted first degree murder and received two concurrent fifteen-year sentences, the minimum sentences for these Class A felonies. On appeal, the petitioner contends her pleas were unknowingly and involuntarily entered due to ineffective assistance of counsel. We affirm the judgment of the post-conviction court. |
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
W2002-02228-COA-R3-CV
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Mohammad Rafieetary v. Maryam Khoshroo Rafieetary
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Eslie L. Morgan
A Shelby County jury convicted the defendant, Eslie L. Morgan, of attempted voluntary manslaughter. The trial court sentenced him to eight years in confinement as a Range II multiple offender. On appeal, the defendant contends: (1) the evidence is insufficient to support his conviction; and (2) the trial court erred in permitting the prosecutor to ask the victim an improper question during redirect examination. Upon review of the record and the applicable law, we affirm the judgment of the trial court. |
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. John Johnson
The jury convicted the defendant of especially aggravated robbery and theft over $10,000. The trial court imposed consecutive twenty-five-year and ten-year sentences, respectively. On appeal, the defendant argues: (1) there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction for especially aggravated robbery; (2) the trial court erred in not allowing him to move from the defense table to view evidence on a monitor; and (3) the trial court erred in sentencing him. We affirm the judgments of the trial court. |
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
W2003-00461-COA-R3-CV
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
CH-01-1611-3
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Larry Neeley v. Southern Tank Leasing Company,
|
Davidson | Workers Compensation Panel | |
Jose Santiago v. The Hartford,
|
Warren | Workers Compensation Panel | |
Traci L. Nolan v. Covenant Health
|
Knox | Workers Compensation Panel | |
W2002-02676-COA-R3-CV
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Jeanne L. Schuett v. Egon Horst Schuett, Jr.
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Thomas Anthony Talley
The defendant was convicted of driving under the influence, fourth offense, and violation of the implied consent law. He contends on appeal that (1) there was no reasonable suspicion for the stop and (2) the evidence was insufficient because the officer used a non-standardized test. Crossing the yellow line on several occasions and almost hitting a trooper provided sufficient probable cause for the stop, and the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction. We affirm the judgments of the trial court. |
Gibson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Maria Louise Bernhard Kollasch Krahn v. Todd Michael
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
CH-00-0939-2
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
CH-02-1470-3
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals |