Please enter some keywords to search.
| State v. Bobby Godsey
E1997-00207-SC-R11-DD
Authoring Judge: Justice Frank F. Drowota, III
Originating Judge:R. Jerry Beck |
Sullivan County | Supreme Court | 11/29/01 | |
| State v. Stephen Bart Wood
M2001-00872-COA-R3-CD
The General Sessions Court of Davidson County found the defendant guilty of thirty-six violations of an order of protection and ordered him to serve ten days for each violation. Each sentence was to be served consecutively and day-for-day. The defendant appealed to the Criminal Court and that court affirmed. We find that the Criminal Court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to hear the appeal, that the sentence should be vacated, and the cause remanded to the General Sessions Court for a review of the sentence for excessiveness in accordance with the guidelines we adopt in this opinion.
Authoring Judge: Judge Ben H. Cantrell
Originating Judge:Steve R. Dozier |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 11/29/01 | |
| State v. Bobby Godsey
E1997-00207-SC-R11-DD
Authoring Judge: Justice Frank F. Drowota, III
Originating Judge:R. Jerry Beck |
Sullivan County | Supreme Court | 11/29/01 | |
| Ragan/James Hinson vs. Kelli Gatton
W2001-01763-COA-R3-JV
Father filed a petition to increase visitation, for joint custody and other relief. The juvenile court modified visitation and ordered joint custody. Father appeals. We affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge W. Frank Crawford
Originating Judge:J. Steven Stafford |
Dyer County | Court of Appeals | 11/28/01 | |
| Trinity Industries, Inc. v. McKinnon Bridge Co., Inc.
M2000-00510-COA-R3-CV
An uncompleted highway bridge over the Tennessee River collapsed, triggering a lengthy and convoluted course of litigation between the parties involved in its construction. Litigation began when the company that fabricated the bridge's structural steel components sued the general contractor for non-payment on the contract. The general contractor filed a counter-claim which alleged that the fabricator had breached the contract by producing defective steel components that caused the collapse. The contractor named some of its other subcontractors as third party defendants, claiming that they also bore some responsibility for the collapse of the bridge. In a series of orders, the trial court dismissed the counterclaim and third party claims, and declared that its judgments were final for purposes of Tenn. R. Civ. P. Rule 54.02. After this court heard oral argument on the first of the Rule 54.02 appeals, but before it could issue an opinion, the trial court conducted a hearing on the merits of the steel fabricator's claim, and rendered a judgment in its favor. We affirm the judgment for the price of the steel and the judgment for the fabricator on the general contractor's counterclaim. We reverse the judgment dismissing the third party claims.
Authoring Judge: Judge Ben H. Cantrell
Originating Judge:Carol L. Mccoy |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 11/28/01 | |
| Tim Walton v. Sharon (Walton) Camp
W2001-01409-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge W. Frank Crawford
Originating Judge:George H. Brown |
Shelby County | Court of Appeals | 11/28/01 | |
| Robert Davidson vs. Charles Lindsey
W2000-02891-COA-R3-CV
This appeal arises from an automobile accident involving the Appellants and the Appellees in which the Appellee's wife was killed and the Appellee was seriously injured. The Appellee, individually and as administrator of the estate of his wife, and the Appellee's children filed a complaint in the Circuit Court of Henry County against the Appellants and three of the Appellees. Following a jury trial, the jury found that the Appellants were 100% liable for the accident and dismissed the claims against the three Appellees. The jury awarded the Appellee $1,250,000.00 and awarded the estate of the Appellee's wife $500,000.00. The trial court entered a judgment on the jury's verdict. The Appellants filed a motion for a new trial. The trial court denied the motion for a new trial.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Alan E. Highers
Originating Judge:Julian P. Guinn |
Henry County | Court of Appeals | 11/28/01 | |
| Marlena Tilley vs. Gurpal Bindra
W2001-01157-COA-R3-CV
This appeal arises from a medical malpractice claim brought by the Appellants against the Appellee in the Circuit Court of Dyer County. The Appellee filed a motion for summary judgment. Following the deposition of the Appellants' expert witness, the Appellee filed a renewed motion for summary judgment. The trial court granted the Appellee's motion for summary judgment and renewed motion for summary judgment. The Appellants appeal the grant of the Appellee's motion for summary judgment and renewed motion for summary judgment by the Circuit Court of Dyer County. For the reasons stated herein, we affirm the trial court's decision.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Alan E. Highers
Originating Judge:Lee Moore |
Dyer County | Court of Appeals | 11/28/01 | |
| Jackson-Madison County General Hospital District v. Health Facilities Commission
M1999-02804-COA-R3-CV
This appeal involves a dispute between two hospitals regarding one hospital's desire to expand its intensive care and open-heart surgery services. After Methodist Healthcare-Jackson Hospital applied to the Tennessee Health Facilities Commission for a certificate of need, Jackson-Madison County General Hospital District objected on the ground that the proposed services would unnecessarily duplicate services it was already providing. Even though the Commission denied the application, the Commission's staff issued the certificate of need after the Attorney General and Reporter opined that the Commission's vote on reconsideration was inconsistent with the Commission's enabling statute. Rather than pursuing a contested case hearing before the Commission, Jackson-Madison County filed a petition for common-law writ of certiorari in the Chancery Court for Davidson County asserting that the Commission's vote to deny the certificate of need was proper and that one Commission member who voted to approve the certificate should have been disqualified because of a financial conflict of interest. The trial court granted the writ of certiorari but, following a hearing, dismissed the writ because Jackson-Madison County had not exhausted its administrative remedies. Jackson-Madison County appealed to this court. While this appeal was pending, Jackson-Madison County requested and received a contested case hearing before an administrative law judge sitting in place of the Commission. After the administrative law judge determined that the Commission's vote to deny Methodist Healthcare's application for a certificate of need was proper and that one of the Commission members who voted to grant the certificate of need should have been disqualified, Jackson-Madison County moved to dismiss its appeal. Methodist Healthcare opposed dismissing the appeal. We have determined that the trial court properly dismissed Jackson-Madison County's petition for writ of certiorari and that this appeal should be dismissed.
Authoring Judge: Judge William C. Koch, Jr.
Originating Judge:Irvin H. Kilcrease, Jr. |
Madison County | Court of Appeals | 11/28/01 | |
| Charles Salsman vs. Texcor Indus.
W2001-00730-COA-R9-CV
This appeal arises out of a petition filed in Tennessee to enroll a Texas judgment. In this case, the plaintiffs filed a petition to enroll the foreign judgment. While this was pending, the defendants filed a motion for leave to amend their answer to assert a counterclaim. Three days later, before the trial court had ruled on the motion to amend, the plaintiffs filed a notice of voluntary dismissal, including a proposed order stating that no counterclaim had been pled. The trial court entered the proposed order. Subsequently, in response to the defendants' motion, the trial court vacated its earlier order of dismissal and granted the defendants' motion to amend to assert the counterclaim. In this interlocutory appeal, we affirm, holding under Rule 41.01(1) of the Tennessee Rules of Civil Procedure that the proposed counterclaim attached to the motion to amend is considered a "pleaded" counterclaim, thereby permitting the defendants to elect to proceed on the counterclaim despite the plaintiffs' notice of voluntary dismissal.
Authoring Judge: Judge Holly M. Kirby
Originating Judge:Karen R. Williams |
Shelby County | Court of Appeals | 11/28/01 | |
| CH-00-1455-1
CH-00-1455-1
Originating Judge:Walter L. Evans |
Shelby County | Court of Appeals | 11/28/01 | |
| Stacy Harris v. Thomas Hall
M2000-00784-COA-R3-CV
This case was transferred to a judge in another county for "binding mediation," and the mediating judge entered an order dismissing the lawsuit and enjoining plaintiff from certain actions, including further litigation. The original trial court later denied the plaintiff's Tenn. R. Civ. P. 60.02 motion for relief from orders, and the plaintiff appealed. We find the trial court had no authority to order the case to any alternative dispute resolution procedure other than one established in Tenn. R. Sup. Ct. 31, that the mediating judge had no authority to dispose of the case and, consequently, all orders entered by that judge are void. We reverse the trial court's denial of Rule 60.02 relief, vacate orders entered in the court of the mediating judge, and remand for further proceedings.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Patricia J. Cottrell
Originating Judge:Jeffrey S. Bivins |
Williamson County | Court of Appeals | 11/28/01 | |
| Terminix International Co. v. Department of Labor
M2001-00174-COA-R3-CV
This matter is before the Court upon a petition seeking judicial review of our administrative order. The Petition was initiated in the Chancery Court of Davidson County, Tennessee, wherein the appellants challenged the jurisdiction of the Tennessee Department of Labor, Division of Occupational Safety and Health ("TOSHA") to conduct safety inspections concerning pesticide applicators (i.e., persons who apply pesticides) and to enforce such regulations. The Chancery Court ruled that the Tennessee Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission (TOSHA) has subject matter jurisdiction to conduct inspections and issue citations concerning the safety of pesticide applicators in the work place. We affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge Frank Clement, Jr.
Originating Judge:Irvin H. Kilcrease, Jr. |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 11/28/01 | |
| State of Tennessee v. Dean Byard
M2000-01410-CCA-R3-CD
Defendant appeals from a bench trial where he was found guilty of one count of assault and one count of aggravated assault. Sufficient evidence exists to support the conviction of aggravated assault. The ineffective assistance of counsel claim is wholly unsubstantiated. We affirm the judgments from the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge John Everett Williams
Originating Judge:Judge Seth W. Norman |
Davidson County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 11/27/01 | |
| Troy Allen Thompson v. Elisa Connell Hulbert
W2000-02675-COA-R3-JV
Authoring Judge: Judge Holly M. Kirby
Originating Judge:A. V. Mcdowell |
Shelby County | Court of Appeals | 11/27/01 | |
| Andrew Mays vs. Deborah Mays
W2000-03067-COA-R3-CV
This is a divorce and child custody case. Husband sued for divorce, and Wife countersued. Husband dismissed his complaint on the day of trial. Wife was granted the divorce and custody of the parties' minor child. On appeal, Husband argues that the trial court erred in its division of marital property, its decision to deny Husband rehabilitative alimony, its award of attorney's fees to Wife, and its decision not to hear evidence on the issue of child custody. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand the case to the trial court for a hearing on child custody.
Authoring Judge: Judge David R. Farmer
Originating Judge:Kay S. Robilio |
Shelby County | Court of Appeals | 11/27/01 | |
| In re: Guardianship of Ashley Tatum
W2001-00859-COA-R3-CV
This case involves liability for misappropriation of funds in a guardianship estate. After a guardian was appointed by the probate court, Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland executed a guardianship bond as surety. The order appointing the guardian provided for the guardian's attorney to have joint control of the guardianship estate with the guardian. BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. owed certain sums to the ward and was notified by the guardian's attorney of the joint control provision. The guardian's attorney also requested that the funds be sent to him to be deposited in the guardianship accounts. BellSouth ignored the request and sent the check payable to the guardian. Subsequently, the guardian misappropriated the funds, and the substitute guardian was awarded judgment against F & D. F & D filed a third party complaint against BellSouth for the sums so paid, and after a nonjury trial, the probate court entered judgment for F & D against BellSouth. BellSouth has appealed. We affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge W. Frank Crawford
Originating Judge:Robert S. Benham |
Shelby County | Court of Appeals | 11/27/01 | |
| CH-00-1898-2
CH-00-1898-2
Originating Judge:Floyd Peete, Jr. |
Shelby County | Court of Appeals | 11/27/01 | |
| State of Tennessee v. Daniel Thomason - Order
M2000-01164-CCA-R3-CD
This matter is before us on the court’s own motion to correct errors associated with entries of an order on rehearing, opinion and judgment on October 15, 2001. A brief procedural history is in order to understand the basis for the court’s action in the instant order. On July 11, 2001, this court entered an opinion and judgment in this case. The defendant thereafter moved for rehearing, and we granted his motion on August 14, 2001. On October 15, 2001, we entered an order which addressed the merits of the defendant’s rehearing issue. That order also contained the following language, “The judgment previously entered is WITHDRAWN and is RE-ENTERED as of the entry of this order.” (Emphasis in original.) Although that order directed the withdrawal and reentry of the judgment, both the opinion and the judgment of July 11 were withdrawn and reentered on that date. The withdrawal and reentry of the opinion was in error. Moreover, that erroneous action prompted the accrual of additional costs.
Authoring Judge: Per Curiam
|
Davidson County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 11/27/01 | |
| State of Tennessee v. Deadrick M. Pigg
M2000-03056-CCA-MR3-CD
The Defendant, Deadrick Pigg, was convicted in the Criminal Court of Davidson County of the sale of less than .5 grams of cocaine.1 After a sentencing hearing, the Defendant was sentenced to serve eight years in the Department of Correction. In his appeal as of right pursuant to Rule 3(b) of the Tennessee Rules of Appellate Procedure, the Defendant argues that (1) the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to support the jury’s guilty verdict because the verdict was based solely on uncorroborated accomplice testimony and (2) the trial court erred in allowing the State to impeach the Defendant with evidence of past convictions. After a thorough review of the record, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge David H. Welles
Originating Judge:Judge Cheryl A. Blackburn |
Davidson County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 11/27/01 | |
| Harry Kradel. v. Piper Industries
M2001-00338-SC-R23-CQ
Pursuant to Tennessee Supreme Court Rule 23, this Court accepted certification of five questions of law from the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit concerning Tennessee's law of corporations. For the reasons given herein, we answer that the corporate statutes in effect before January 1, 1988, apply to determine the rights and remedies available against a corporation dissolved before that date and that section 48-1-1013(a) (repealed) applies to limit Piper's liability for post-dissolution claims. We further answer that Piper Industries, Inc. did comply with the dissolution statutes in effect before January 1, 1988, which require provisions to ensure the final distribution of corporate assets, but which do not require a corporation to establish a reserve fund for contingent claims arising more than two years after the dissolution. Finally, we answer that while the trust fund doctrine has been previously applied in Tennessee to solvent corporations, its application in this case is necessarily limited by Tennessee Code Annotated section 48-1-1013(a) (repealed).
Authoring Judge: Justice William M. Barker
|
Supreme Court | 11/27/01 | ||
| Ashad R. A. Muhammed Ali v. Board of Probation and Parole, et al.
M2001-01194-COA-R3-CV
Petitioner seeks a writ of certiorari from the decision of the board of paroles declining to grant him parole. The Chancery Court of Davidson County, Irvin H. Kilcrease, Jr., Chancellor, dismissed the petition. We affirm the chancellor.
Authoring Judge: Judge William B. Cain
Originating Judge:Irvin H. Kilcrease, Jr. |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 11/26/01 | |
| Thomas Anderson, Jr. v. State of Tennessee
M2000-01737-CCA-R3-PC
The petitioner appeals the denial of post-conviction relief from his conviction for theft of property valued less than $1000 but greater than $500, a Class E felony, arguing that the post-conviction court erred in finding that he received effective assistance of trial counsel. After a careful review of the record, we conclude that the petitioner failed to meet his burden of demonstrating ineffective assistance of counsel. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the post-conviction court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Jerry L. Smith
Originating Judge:Judge Timothy L. Easter |
Williamson County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 11/21/01 | |
| State of Tennessee v. Benjamin Hernandez, III
M2000-00225-CCA-R3-CD
The defendant was indicted for premeditated first degree murder, convicted of the lesser-included offense of second degree murder, and sentenced to 25 years in the Department of Correction. In this appeal, the defendant alleges: (1) the evidence was insufficient to sustain his conviction; (2) the state failed to provide him with exculpatory evidence; (3) the state destroyed evidence, thereby depriving him of due process; and (4) the trial court erroneously failed to grant a continuance or mistrial when a witness became ill and was unavailable to testify. After a thorough review of the record, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Joe G. Riley
Originating Judge:Judge Leon C. Burns, Jr. |
Putnam County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 11/21/01 | |
| State of Tennessee v. Tony Williams
W2001-00788-CCA-R9-CD
The defendant, Tony Williams, appeals the trial court's denial of pretrial diversion after a petition for certiorari from the decision of the district attorney. In this discretionary appeal under Rule 9 of the Tennessee Rules of Appellate Procedure, the single issue presented for review is whether the denial of pretrial diversion qualified as an abuse of prosecutorial discretion. The judgment denying relief is affirmed.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Gary R Wade
Originating Judge:Judge Bernie Weinman |
Shelby County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 11/21/01 |