| State vs. Bernard K. Johnson
E2000-00009-CCA-R3-CD
The defendant appeals to challenge the sufficiency of the evidence supporting his convictions of sexual battery and aggravated kidnapping and the propriety of the felony sentences imposed by the trial court. We affirm the convictions, but upon notice of plain error, we reverse a misdemeanor conviction of aggravated criminal trespass. Finding the misapplication of some enhancement factors, we modify some of the sentences.
Authoring Judge: Judge J. Curwood Witt, Jr.
Originating Judge:Ray L. Jenkins |
Knox County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 09/27/00 | |
| Michael Bailey vs. State
E2000-00432-CCA-R3-PC
A Sullivan County jury convicted the petitioner of one count of second degree murder involving the death of his son. For this offense the petitioner received a sentence of twenty years as a Range I, standard offender, and a $50,000 fine. He unsuccessfully brought a direct appeal challenging both his conviction and sentence. Subsequently, he filed a pro se post-conviction petition and was appointed counsel from the public defender's office. Following an evidentiary hearing, the trial court took this matter under advisement and later issued a detailed order dismissing the petition. Thereafter, the petitioner requested that his appointed attorney withdraw from the case and that he be allowed to bring his appeal pro se. The trial court granted this motion, and the petitioner now brings this appeal raising three issues. More specifically, he asserts that (1) the jury instructions, when viewed overall, effectively denied him "a fair trial and a reliable verdict;" (2) the State engaged in misconduct and denied him a fair trial by withholding exculpatory material; and (3) the prosecuting officer made the result of the petitioner's trial unreliable because the officer perjured himself. After reviewing these issues, we find that all have been waived and/or lack merit. We, therefore, affirm the trial court's denial of post-conviction relief.
Authoring Judge: Judge Jerry Smith
Originating Judge:R. Jerry Beck |
Sullivan County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 09/27/00 | |
| Michael E. Christian vs. State
E2000-00922-CCA-R3-PC
The petitioner, Michael E. Christian, appeals the trial court's denial of his petition for post-conviction relief. He contends that he did not voluntarily enter his guilty pleas because he was experiencing panic attacks and confusion, which was a side effect of his medication, at the time he entered the pleas. He also claims that he received the ineffective assistance of counsel because his attorneys did not investigate the effects of his medication on his competency and scared him into pleading guilty. We affirm the trial court's denial of the petition.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Joseph M. Tipton
Originating Judge:R. Jerry Beck |
Sullivan County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 09/27/00 | |
| Jimmy B. Hillard, et al vs. Buddie Ruth Franklin
E2000-00402-COA-R3-CV
This is a suit for specific performance. The plaintiffs entered into an agreement with the defendant to purchase certain real property for $80,000. Before the purchase was closed, a house on the property was destroyed by fire, and the defendant collected $35,000 as proceeds from her homeowners' insurance policy. The purchase of the property did not proceed to closing and the plaintiffs filed suit for specific performance of the contract at a purchase price of $45,000 -- this amount being the difference between the original purchase price and the insurance proceeds collected by the defendant. The trial court granted the plaintiffs summary judgment. The defendant appeals, contending that this case is not ripe for summary judgment. We affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge Charles D. Susano, Jr.
Originating Judge:Richard R. Vance |
Jefferson County | Court of Appeals | 09/27/00 | |
| State vs. Tracy L. Fry
E1999-02758-CCA-R3-CD
Tracy Fry, the Defendant and Appellant, pled guilty to driving under the influence, second offense. With the State's and trial court's agreement, however, she specifically reserved the right to appeal a dispositive question of law pursuant to Tenn. R. Crim. P. 37(b)(2)(1). The issue reserved for review is whether Officer Kyte "had reasonable suspicion based on specific and articulable facts, to approach and subsequently seize the defendant leading to the arrest of the defendant." We conclude that the initial encounter between Officer Kyte and the Defendant was not a seizure, that the encounter provided reasonable suspicion sufficient to justify an investigatory detention of the Defendant, and that sufficient probable cause to arrest the Defendant developed during the course of the brief investigatory detention. Thus, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Authoring Judge: Judge Jerry Smith
Originating Judge:Lynn W. Brown |
Washington County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 09/27/00 | |
| Walter E. Everette, et al vs. Hubert G. Berry, et al
E2000-00461-COA-R3-CV
In this dispute over real estate, the Plaintiffs seek to have a quit claim deed conveying certain property to the Defendants declared spurious, as well as injunctive relief relative to rights-of-way adjacent to their property. The Chancellor granted the relief the Plaintiffs sought, resulting in this appeal. We affirm.
Originating Judge:Daryl R. Fansler |
Knox County | Court of Appeals | 09/27/00 | |
| State vs. Bobby Wells
E2000-01496-CCA-R3-CD
A Monroe County jury convicted the defendant of the sale of .5 grams or more of cocaine and of a separate offense involving the sale of less than .5 grams of cocaine. For these crimes the trial court sentenced him to nine years and four years respectively as a Range I, standard offender. These sentences were ordered to run concurrently with one another. Furthermore, the jury assessed the defendant a fifteen thousand dollar fine on each conviction. At a subsequent hearing the trial court denied his new trial motion and revoked his probation from previous offenses. Appealing these decisions, the defendant raises the following six issues: 1) whether the trial court erred by permitting the State to introduce transcripts of taped conversations allegedly transpiring between the defendant and informant when such transcripts were admitted through a police officer who neither heard nor electronically monitored the involved conversations; 2) whether the trial court erred by permitting the prosecution to play and introduce the aforementioned tapes through the same officer; 3) whether the State failed to prove chain of custody because it neither called the lab technician who placed the evidence in the vault at the crime laboratory nor complied with Tennessee Rule of Evidence 803(6); 4) whether the trial court erred in refusing to grant the defendant a new trial based on newly discovered evidence involving the informant's motive for testifying against the defendant; 5) whether sufficient evidence existed to support the conviction; and 6) whether the defendant's probation revocation should stand when such was based upon the above-outlined new convictions and not the defendant's failure to report as was alleged in the probation violation warrant and when the convictions forming the basis for the revocation are allegedly not supported by sufficient evidence. After a review of the record, we find these claims to lack merit and, therefore, affirm the lower court's actions.
Authoring Judge: Judge Jerry Smith
Originating Judge:R. Steven Bebb |
Monroe County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 09/27/00 | |
| State vs. James E. Harman, Jr.
E2000-00437-CCA-R3-CD
In October of 1999, the defendant pled guilty to one count of theft over one-thousand dollars ($1,000.00) and one count of possession of less than .5 ounces of marijuana. His plea form indicated that he agreed to receive concurrent sentences of five and one-half years as a Range II, multiple offender for the former offense and eleven months and twenty-nine days for the latter. Subsequently, the trial court conducted a hearing to determine the manner in which these sentences were to be served. At the conclusion of such hearing, the trial court denied the defendant any form of alternative sentencing, and it is this denial that the defendant contests through his appeal. However, after having reviewed the record and applicable authorities, we find this contention to be without merit and, therefore, affirm the trial court's sentence.
Authoring Judge: Judge Jerry Smith
Originating Judge:R. Jerry Beck |
Sullivan County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 09/27/00 | |
| State vs. Frankie Lee Lunsford
E2000-00642-CCA-R3-CD
The defendant appeals from his sentences imposed in the Sullivan County Criminal Court for three counts of contributing to the unruliness of a minor, a Class A misdemeanor; one count of inhaling paint, a Class A misdemeanor; one count of public intoxication, a Class C misdemeanor; one count of giving paint to another for unlawful purposes, a Class E felony; and one count of possession of drug paraphernalia, a Class A misdemeanor. The trial court imposed a sentence of two years on the felony conviction to be served in the Department of Correction, with the misdemeanor sentences running concurrently to the felony and to each other. In this direct appeal, the defendant challenges the denial of probation or alternative sentencing. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge J. Curwood Witt, Jr.
Originating Judge:R. Jerry Beck |
Sullivan County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 09/27/00 | |
| State vs. Charles Arnold Ballinger
E2000-01339-CCA-R3-CD
On October 14, 1998, a Bradley County Grand Jury indicted Charles Ballinger, the defendant and appellant, for statutory rape and contributing to the delinquency of a minor. Following a jury trial, the defendant was convicted on both counts. The court sentenced the defendant to serve two years for statutory rape concurrently with eleven months and twenty-nine days for contributing to the delinquency of a minor. On appeal, the defendant claims (1) that the evidence was insufficient to support a statutory rape conviction, (2) that the trial court should have suppressed a tape recording of a telephone conversation, (3) that the defendant's sentence was excessive, and (4) that the trial court should have instructed the jury to consider mistake of fact as a defense. Because we find that statutory rape requires proof of at least a "recklessness" mens rea and that the trial court should have instructed the jury to consider mistake of fact as a defense to statutory rape, we reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand this case for a new trial.
Authoring Judge: Judge Jerry Smith
Originating Judge:R. Steven Bebb |
Bradley County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 09/27/00 | |
| John E. Carter vs. Howard Carlton
E2000-00406-CCA-R3-PC
John E. Carter seeks the writ of habeas corpus. He claims that he is entitled to immediate release from his two 1981 convictions for the first degree murder of his grandparents. Carter alleges that he is being illegally restrained because he had inadequate notice of the charges against him, because the trial court excluded relevant evidence at his trial, and because the jury instructions given at his trial were flawed. We agree with the court below that these issues do not entitle Carter to issuance of the writ of habeas corpus. Accordingly, we affirm the lower court's dismissal of the petition.
Authoring Judge: Judge J. Curwood Witt, Jr.
Originating Judge:Robert E. Cupp |
Johnson County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 09/27/00 | |
| State vs. Robbie Carriger
E2000-00823-CCA-R3-CD
The state challenges the trial court's order placing the defendant, Robbie Carriger, on pretrial diversion based upon its finding that the prosecutor abused his discretion for failing to consider all the factors relevant to pretrial diversion in his written response denying diversion. The state contends that the trial court erred in refusing to consider the prosecutor's amended response to the application for pretrial diversion. We hold that the trial court properly refused to consider the prosecutor's amended response, but we reverse the trial court's automatic grant of pretrial diversion and remand the case for the trial court to consider the defendant's entitlement to pretrial diversion in light of the relevant factors.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Joseph M. Tipton
Originating Judge:Robert E. Cupp |
Carter County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 09/26/00 | |
| State vs. Randall Best
E1999-00120-CCA-R3-CD
The defendant, Randall E. Best, appeals his first degree murder conviction and the resulting sentence of life without parole. He contends: (1) that the evidence is insufficient to show premeditation and deliberation, (2) that certain photographs of the victim were inadmissible at the sentencing phase of the trial, and (3) that the felony murder aggravating circumstance does not sufficiently narrow the class of death-eligible offenders when the jury convicts the defendant of both premeditated murder and felony murder. We hold that the evidence is sufficient, that the challenged photographs are admissible because they are relevant to the aggravating and mitigating circumstances, and that the jury properly based the defendant's sentence on the felony murder aggravator. We affirm the trial court's judgment of conviction.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Joseph M. Tipton
Originating Judge:Carroll L. Ross |
Monroe County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 09/26/00 | |
| State vs. Roy Ray Wallace
E2000-00046-CCA-R3-CD
The defendant appeals his convictions for burglary and theft of property valued at less than five hundred dollars. He challenges the sufficiency of the evidence in light of the uncorroborated testimony of an accomplice, the admissibility of a recording of his co-defendant's testimony, and the length of his sentence. We affirm the convictions and sentences.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Joseph M. Tipton
Originating Judge:O. Duane Slone |
Grainger County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 09/26/00 | |
| State vs. Almeer Nance
E2000-00170-CCA-R3-CD
Following the transfer of his case from juvenile court, a Knox County grand jury indicted the defendant on one count of premeditated murder, one count of felony murder, one count of especially aggravated robbery, two counts of especially aggravated kidnapping, three counts of aggravated robbery, one count of aggravated assault, and two counts of theft over one thousand but under ten thousand dollars. Prior to trial the defendant filed an unsuccessful motion to suppress the statement he gave to authorities. The case proceeded to trial wherein the defendant was convicted as charged on seven of the aforementioned counts: more specifically, the jury found him guilty of the felony murder, especially aggravated robbery, especially aggravated kidnapping, and aggravated robbery offenses. For these crimes he received an agreed upon effective sentence of life plus twenty-five years in prison. He then filed a "Motion for Judgment of Acquittal, or in the Alternative, Motion for New Trial" alleging the trial court erred in failing to suppress his statement. After the denial of this motion, the defendant brought the instant appeal again raising the suppression issue. However, upon reviewing the record and applicable case law, we affirm the trial court's denial of the motion to suppress the defendant's statement.
Authoring Judge: Judge Jerry Smith
Originating Judge:Ray L. Jenkins |
Knox County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 09/26/00 | |
| Slater Belcher vs. State
E1999-02287-CCA-R3-PC
Authoring Judge: Judge Jerry Smith
Originating Judge:D. Kelly Thomas, Jr. |
Blount County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 09/26/00 | |
| Steamfitters vs. Phillip Morris
W1999-01061-COA-R9-CV
Union health and welfare funds brought an action against tobacco companies and their trade associations to recover the funds' costs of treating their participants' smoking-related illnesses. The tobacco companies moved to dismiss the complaint, arguing that the funds' economic injuries were derivative of the participants' physical injuries and, consequently, too remote for recovery. The trial court granted the motion to dismiss on the funds' antitrust claim but denied the motion on the funds' claims for fraud and deceit, misrepresentation, conspiracy and violation of the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act. Permission for interlocutory appeal was granted to the tobacco companies by both the trial court and the appellate court. We affirm the trial court's dismissal of the antitrust claim and reverse the trial court's denial of the motion to dismiss on the remaining claims, finding the plaintiffs' alleged injuries are too remote, as a matter of law, to permit recovery. The cause is remanded for entry of an order dismissing the plaintiffs' complaint.
Authoring Judge: Judge Holly M. Kirby
Originating Judge:James F. Russell |
Shelby County | Court of Appeals | 09/26/00 | |
| J.Y. Sepulveda vs. State
E1999-02766-CCA-R3-PC
This is an appeal from the denial of the appellant, J. Y. Sepulveda's petition for post-conviction relief on the grounds that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel at the pre-trial stage of the prosecution. Appellant also alleges that the trial judge erred in not allowing testimony at the post-conviction hearing concerning ineffective assistance of trial counsel during trial. We find that none of these issues constitute error and affirm the trial court's denial of the petition for post-conviction relief.
Authoring Judge: Judge Jerry Smith
Originating Judge:Rex Henry Ogle |
Jefferson County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 09/26/00 | |
| State vs. Wendell Lewis
W2001-03098-CCA-R3-CD
When the defendant's status on community corrections was revoked, the trial court should have given the defendant credit for the time served in the community corrections program. We, therefore, reverse and modify the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge John Everett Williams
Originating Judge:James C. Beasley, Jr. |
Shelby County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 09/26/00 | |
| Slater Belcher vs. State
E1999-02287-CCA-R3-PC
Authoring Judge: Judge Jerry Smith
Originating Judge:D. Kelly Thomas, Jr. |
Blount County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 09/26/00 | |
| Jackie McGregor vs. Gregor Scott McGregor
E1999-00877-COA-R3-CV
This is a divorce case. Following a bench trial, the court below (1) granted the parties a divorce on stipulated grounds; (2) divided the marital property; and (3) found that wife was not entitled to an award of alimony, but that funds withdrawn by her from a joint account immediately prior to her filing for divorce constituted necessary temporary support for her and the parties' daughter. Wife appeals the trial court's characterization of certain real property as marital property and the trial court's division of the marital property. Both wife and husband take issue with the trial court's treatment of the funds withdrawn by wife from the joint account. We affirm the judgment of the trial court, as modified.
Authoring Judge: Judge Charles D. Susano, Jr.
Originating Judge:L. Marie Williams |
Hamilton County | Court of Appeals | 09/26/00 | |
| State vs. Jimmy Cullop
E2000-00095-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge J. Curwood Witt, Jr.
Originating Judge:R. Jerry Beck |
Sullivan County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 09/26/00 | |
| State vs. Chris A. Jefferson
E2000-00429-CCA-R3-CD
Chris A. Jefferson appeals a certified question of law regarding a police officer's stop of him which resulted in his arrest for driving under the influence. Because we agree with the trial court that reasonable suspicion supported by specific and articulable facts existed for the stop, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge J. Curwood Witt, Jr.
Originating Judge:Phyllis H. Miller |
Sullivan County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 09/26/00 | |
| Rongie Taylor vs. State
M2002-01780-CCA-R3-PC
The post-conviction court denied the appellant's petition for post-conviction relief following his guilty plea to robbery with an agreed five-year sentence. In this appeal, the appellant argues: (1) his guilty plea was not entered voluntarily and knowingly; and (2) his trial counsel failed to provide him effective assistance relating to the entry of his plea. We affirm the judgment of the post-conviction court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Jerry Smith
Originating Judge:James L. Weatherford |
Warren County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 09/26/00 | |
| Clara Frazier,vs. East Tennessee Baptist Hosp., Inc. et al.
E2000-00686-COA-R3-CV
In this medical malpractice case brought by Clara Frazier, as Administratrix of the Estate of Josie Mae Blalock Pickens against East Tennessee Baptist Hospital, Inc., and Mark W. Jackson, M.D., the Trial Court sustained the motion of Baptist Hospital for summary judgment because the order granting an amendment to add Baptist Hospital as a party defendant after a non-suit had earlier been taken, was not timely and exceeded the one year mandated in T.C.A. 28-1-105(a). Ms. Frazier appeals, insisting that Rule 15.03 of the Tenn. R. Civ. P. is applicable and that the amendment related back to the date of the initial filing. We find the Trial Court acted properly and affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge Houston M. Goddard
Originating Judge:Dale C. Workman |
Knox County | Court of Appeals | 09/26/00 |
