02C01-9503-CC-00083
02C01-9503-CC-00083
|
Carroll County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 01/31/96 | |
And Our Supreme Court'S Opinion In State v. Adams, 864 S.W.2D 31 (Tenn. 1993), The
02C01-9506-CC-00178
|
Hardeman County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 01/31/96 | |
02C01-9505-CR-00121
02C01-9505-CR-00121
|
Shelby County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 01/31/96 | |
02C01-9507-CC-00180
02C01-9507-CC-00180
|
Fayette County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 01/31/96 | |
02C01-9503-CC-00069
02C01-9503-CC-00069
Originating Judge:Whit A. Lafon |
Madison County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 01/31/96 | |
01A01-9508-CV-00378
01A01-9508-CV-00378
Originating Judge:Henry Denmark Bell |
Williamson County | Court of Appeals | 01/31/96 | |
02C01-9410-CR-00219
02C01-9410-CR-00219
|
Hardeman County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 01/31/96 | |
02C01-9506-CC-00178
02C01-9506-CC-00178
|
Hardeman County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 01/31/96 | |
Hon. Wil v. Doran
02C01-9503-CR-00079
|
Shelby County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 01/31/96 | |
01A01-9509-CV-00405
01A01-9509-CV-00405
Originating Judge:Walter C. Kurtz |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 01/31/96 | |
State of Tennessee v. Billy D. Frasier - Dissenting
01S01-9503-CC-00036
I dissent from the majority's holding that a person arrested for driving under the influence of an intoxicant will be denied the right to consult with counsel prior to submitting to a breath test, regardless of the circumstances, and also from the majority's holidng that the defendant's right against self-incrimination would not be violated by the adminssion of his refusal to submit to the breath test as evidence of intoxication.
Authoring Judge: Justice Lyle Reid
Originating Judge:Judge John A. Turnbull |
Putnam County | Supreme Court | 01/29/96 | |
03S01-9503-CV-00029
03S01-9503-CV-00029
Originating Judge:W. Dale Young |
Supreme Court | 01/29/96 | ||
Joseph Carl Owens v. Truckstops of America, Truckstops of America, Inc. v. B. Michael Design, Inc. and Vitro Products, Inc. - Dissenting
01S01-9408-CV-00077
Based on the plaintiff's expectations at the time he filed this lawsuit in 1988, I agree with the majority that, in this transition case, it is reasonable to permit the plaintiff to recover from the defendants that he named in his complaint ("Truckstops") all of his damages that were proximately caused by Truckstops and that were not attributable to the plaintiff's own fault (if any). I also agree with the majority that it is fair in this transition case to permit Truckstops to receive contribution from the parties that were named by Truckstops as third-party defendants. However, I believe that the contribution should be based on the parties' respective percentages of fault, and that this method should apply not only to the negligence claims set forth in the thirdparty complaint, but to the strict products liability claim as well. If liability were thus linked to fault on each claim in the third-party complaint, each defendant (including the third-party defendants) would be liable only for the percentage of the plaintiff's damages that was caused by that defendant's fault, and the doctrine of joint and several liability would have no application.
Authoring Judge: Justice Frank F. Drowota, III
Originating Judge:Judge Marietta M. Shipley |
Davidson County | Supreme Court | 01/29/96 | |
01S01-9503-CC-00036
01S01-9503-CC-00036
Originating Judge:John A. Turnbull |
Supreme Court | 01/29/96 | ||
03A01-9510-CV-00365
03A01-9510-CV-00365
Originating Judge:Inman |
Court of Appeals | 01/29/96 | ||
02S01-9502-CR-00019
02S01-9502-CR-00019
Originating Judge:H. T. Lockard |
Shelby County | Supreme Court | 01/29/96 | |
Joseph Carl Owens v. Truckstops of America, Truckstops of America, Inc. and B.P. America, Inc. v. B Michael Design, Inc. and Vitro Products, Inc.
01S01-9408-CV-00077
This interlocutory appeal presents for determination the principles of comparative fault applicable to the assessment of liability among joint tort feasors and the application of those principles to this transitional case, in which the cause of action accrued prior to the decision in McIntyre v. Balentine, 833 S.W.2d52 (Tenn. 1992). The decision of the Court of Appeals is modified and the case is remanded to the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Justice Lyle Reid
Originating Judge:Judge Marietta M. Shipley |
Davidson County | Supreme Court | 01/29/96 | |
02S01-9406-CV-00032
02S01-9406-CV-00032
|
Supreme Court | 01/29/96 | ||
03A01-9509-CH-00314
03A01-9509-CH-00314
|
Court of Appeals | 01/29/96 | ||
Roy Baines vs. Wilson County
M2000-00830-COA-R3-CV
This appeal involves a suit for retaliatory discharge brought by the plaintiff against Wilson County, Wilson Emergency Management Agency and the plaintiff's supervisor. The plaintiff asserts that he was fired in retaliation for filing a workers' compensation claim. The trial court dismissed the plaintiff's claim because, it held, Wilson County and Wilson Emergency Management Agency were both immune pursuant to the Tennessee Governmental Tort Liability Act. Further, it held that the plaintiff did not allege a prima facie case of retaliatory discharge against his supervisor because his supervisor was not his employer. We agree and, therefore, affirm the holdings of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Patricia J. Cottrell
Originating Judge:C. K. Smith |
Wilson County | Court of Appeals | 01/29/96 | |
03A01-9510-CH-00357
03A01-9510-CH-00357
Originating Judge:Inman |
Court of Appeals | 01/29/96 | ||
03A01-9507-JV-00246
03A01-9507-JV-00246
|
Hamblen County | Court of Appeals | 01/29/96 | |
03S01-9502-CV-00013
03S01-9502-CV-00013
Originating Judge:Roger E. Thayer |
Supreme Court | 01/29/96 | ||
03A01-9508-CH-00293
03A01-9508-CH-00293
|
Court of Appeals | 01/29/96 | ||
02A01-9410-CH-00230
02A01-9410-CH-00230
Originating Judge:D. J. Alissandratos |
Shelby County | Court of Appeals | 01/29/96 |