Dudley G. Boyd, et al. v. Comdata Network, Inc., et al.

Case Number
M2000-00949-COA-R9-CV
This appeal involves a discovery dispute implicating the common interest privilege and the work product doctrine. After filing suit in the Chancery Court for Williamson County to rescind their guaranties, the individual guarantors of a corporate debt served interrogatories and requests for production of documents on the creditor seeking copies of all written communications between the creditor and the corporation from which the creditor had purchased the corporate debt. The creditor objected to the production of documents involving its negotiation of a joint defense agreement with the original creditor and the drafts of an agreement to repurchase the corporate debt. The trial court directed the creditor to produce both categories of documents but permitted the creditor to pursue an interlocutory appeal. We granted the interlocutory appeal to address the application of the common interest privilege and the work product doctrine. We have determined that the common interest privilege shields the documents relating to the joint defense agreement from discovery and that the work product doctrine likewise protects the drafts of the repurchase agreement. Accordingly, we reverse the trial court's order compelling the production of these documents.
Authoring Judge
Judge William C. Koch, Jr.
Originating Judge
Russell Heldman
Case Name
Dudley G. Boyd, et al. v. Comdata Network, Inc., et al.
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
No
Download PDF Version
BoydDG.pdf83.44 KB