Linda Ottinger, et. al v. Shelly Evans Ottinger - Concurring

Case Number
E2003-02893-COA-R3-CV

I concur completely in Judge Swiney’s opinion. I write separately to emphasize what the majority opinion expressly states, i.e., that the Defendant in the instant case did not challenge the constitutionality of Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-6-306 (2001 & Supp. 2003). I continue to have some doubt that the deprivation of a relationship with grandparents can form the basis for the type of substantial harm contemplated by the Supreme Court’s decision in Hawk v. Hawk, 855 S.W.2d 573 (Tenn. 1993). See Dugan v. Myers, C/A No. E2001-00281-COA-R3-JV, 2001 WL 1117514, at *2 (Tenn. Ct. App. E.S., filed September 24, 2001), no perm. app. requested (Susano, J., concurring). However, since that issue is not before us in this case, we do not need to reach it.

Authoring Judge
Judge Charles D. Susano, Jr.
Originating Judge
Judge Jacqueline E. Schulten
Case Name
Linda Ottinger, et. al v. Shelly Evans Ottinger - Concurring
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
No
Download PDF Version