Property owners filed suit against neighbors for trespass. Trial court entered judgment for plaintiffs in the amount of $13,740, applying the "mild rule" for calculation of damages for trespass. Trial court also made rulings establishing the boundary lines between property of plaintiffs and defendants, and confirmed the plaintiffs' continuing right of ingress and egress through defendant's property to their own property. On appeal, plaintiffs contend that trial court erred in failing to award damages based on "harsh rule" rather than mild rule; in failing to find that the boundary lines were in keeping with plaintiffs' expert's survey; and in granting summary judgment to defendant water utility district. We conclude that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment to the water utility district. In all other respects, we affirm.
Case Number
M2003-03100-COA-R3-CV
Originating Judge
Chancellor Tom E. Gray
Case Name
Jerry D. Carmack, et al. v. Tina M. Earp, et al.
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
No
Download PDF Version
CarmackJopn.pdf88.51 KB