Ahmed Usso and Genet Ayele v. Bryan Winston - Dissenting

Case Number
E2005-01746-COA-R3-CV

I must respectfully dissent from the majority’s conclusion “that the plaintiffs acted in good faith and diligence, and are entitled to a refund of their earnest money.” I agree fully with everything in the majority’s opinion except this final conclusion.

Authoring Judge
Judge D. Michael Swiney
Originating Judge
Chancellor G. Richard Johnson
Case Name
Ahmed Usso and Genet Ayele v. Bryan Winston - Dissenting
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
This is a dissenting opinion
Download PDF Version