Andrew Blake Moorehead v. Stacy Christine Fugitt (Moorehead) - Dissenting

Case Number
W2005-02711-COA-R3-CV

I dissent from the majority opinion in this case because, in my view, the parenting plan clearly and unequivocally designated Father as the primary residential parent. Therefore, I believe it was necessary for the trial court to determine whether there had been a material change of circumstances and, if so, whether a modification would be in the child’s best interest. Both parties sought to modify the permanent parenting plan. 

Authoring Judge
Judge David R. Farmer
Originating Judge
Chancellor James F. Butler
Case Name
Andrew Blake Moorehead v. Stacy Christine Fugitt (Moorehead) - Dissenting
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
This is a dissenting opinion
Download PDF Version