This appeal involves a legal malpractice claim that a client brought against her former attorney after this Court issued a decision terminating the client’s receipt of alimony. The attorney had represented the client in her divorce case. When the parties executed their marital dissolution agreement, the attorney allegedly provided erroneous advice to the client about a provision that would terminate her alimony if she cohabited with an unrelated male. Subsequent to the divorce, the client’s ex-husband filed a petition to terminate his alimony obligation because the client was living with another man. Although the client initially retained this same attorney to defend against the petition, she later discharged her and retained other counsel. The trial court ruled in the client’s favor, but on appeal, we reversed and terminated the alimony obligation. The client then sued her former attorney, but the trial court granted summary judgment to the attorney based upon the one year statute of limitations for legal malpractice claims. We affirm.
Case Number
W2007-00185-COA-R3-CV
Originating Judge
Judge Allen W. Wallace
Case Name
Ann M. Honeycutt v. Wilkes, Mccullough & Wagner, and Barbara McCullough, Individually
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
This is a dissenting opinion
Download PDF Version
HoneycuttannMOPN.pdf131.69 KB