Rondal Akers, et al. v. Buckner- Rush Enterprises Inc. et al. - Concurring/Dissenting

Case Number
E2006-01513-COA-R3-CV

For the reasons stated in my separate opinion, concurring in part and dissenting in part, in the case of Robert H. Crawford, Sr. et al. v. J. Avery Bryan Funeral Home, Inc. et al., No. E2006-00987-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. E.S., filed November 21, 2007), I respectfully dissent from so much of the majority opinion as affirms the dismissal of the complaints filed by Rondal D. Akers, Jr., Lucinda Akers, Donna Burns, Susan Hall, Doyle Harden, Ricky Harden, Sandra Fogle, Mollie C. Denton, and Elaine Waldron, against the individuals and entities directly associated with the operation of Tri-State Crematory, as to the claims in those complaints alleging outrageous conduct/infliction of emotional distress. In all other respects, I concur in the majority opinion.

Authoring Judge
Judge Charles D. Susano, Jr.
Originating Judge
Judge W. Neil Thomas, III
Case Name
Rondal Akers, et al. v. Buckner- Rush Enterprises Inc. et al. - Concurring/Dissenting
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
This is a dissenting opinion
Download PDF Version