In this appeal, we are asked to determine whether the chancery court erred in failing to allow Appellant to proceed with discovery after the State of Tennessee filed its Motion to Dismiss, in dismissing Appellant’s Complaint and Amended Complaint based solely on argument, without any proof by testimony or documentation, and in dismissing Appellant’s Complaint and Amended Complaint in regards to BellSouth which did not file a motion to dismiss or present evidence or documentation prior to the court’s dismissal. On appeal, Appellant contends that it was entitled to proceed with discovery before the court ruled on the State’s motions. Likewise, Appellant argues that the State should have been required to prove ownership of an easement right of way over Appellant’s property. Finally, Appellant contends that because BellSouth filed only a Notice of Appearance, Appellant’s claim against BellSouth should not have been dismissed. We affirm the trial court’s dismissal.
Case Number
W2008-00722-COA-R3-CV
Originating Judge
Chancellor Ron E. Harmon
Case Name
Tennessee Realty Development., Inc. v. State of Tennessee (Dept. of Transportation) and American Telephone and Telegraph (AT&T)
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
No
Download PDF Version
TennesseeRealtyDevelopmentOPN.pdf128.36 KB