Norman Redwing v. The Catholic Bishop For The Diocese of Memphis - Dissenting

Case Number
W2009-00986-COA-R10-CV

I concur in the majority’s analysis of the ecclesiastical doctrine and its holding that we do not have subject matter jurisdiction of Mr. Redwing’s claims of negligent hiring and retention, but that we do have subject matter jurisdiction to adjudicate his claim of negligent supervision. I must dissent, however, from the majority’s holding that, as a matter of law, Mr. Redwing’s claim of negligent supervision is barred by the statute of limitations. I believe that, in this case, dismissal based on the pleadings is premature and that Mr. Redwing is entitled to conduct discovery on facts pertinent to whether the statute of limitations is tolled.

Authoring Judge
Judge Holly M. Kirby
Originating Judge
Judge D'Army Bailey
Case Name
Norman Redwing v. The Catholic Bishop For The Diocese of Memphis - Dissenting
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
This is a dissenting opinion